##// END OF EJS Templates
progress: write ui.progress() in terms of ui.makeprogress()...
progress: write ui.progress() in terms of ui.makeprogress() I think ui.makeprogress() should be the preferred interface and we should deprecate ui.progress(). All in-core callers already use ui.makeprogress(). Moving the logic to the scmutil.progress() will let us make further improvements. This seems to have sped up `hg perfprogress` from 1.92 s to 1.85 s, perhaps because we now skip the indirection of updating the progress bar via ui.progress(). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5527

File last commit:

r13041:79388a83 stable
r41178:8cf92ca9 default
Show More
hg.cmd
3 lines | 68 B | application/x-dos-batch | BatchLexer
@echo off
rem launch hg.exe from parent folder
"%~dp0\..\hg.exe" %*