##// END OF EJS Templates
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations...
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations Upcoming commits will teach revlogs to leverage the new compression engine API so that new compression formats can more easily be leveraged in revlogs. We want to be sure this refactoring doesn't regress performance. So this commit introduces "perfrevchunks" to explicitly test performance of reading, decompressing, and recompressing revlog chunks. Here is output when run on the mozilla-unified repo: $ hg perfrevlogchunks -c ! read ! wall 0.346603 comb 0.350000 user 0.340000 sys 0.010000 (best of 28) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.337707 comb 0.340000 user 0.320000 sys 0.020000 (best of 30) ! read batch ! wall 0.013206 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 221) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.013259 comb 0.030000 user 0.010000 sys 0.020000 (best of 222) ! chunk ! wall 1.909939 comb 1.910000 user 1.900000 sys 0.010000 (best of 6) ! chunk batch ! wall 1.750677 comb 1.760000 user 1.740000 sys 0.020000 (best of 6) ! compress ! wall 5.668004 comb 5.670000 user 5.670000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) $ hg perfrevlogchunks -m ! read ! wall 0.365834 comb 0.370000 user 0.350000 sys 0.020000 (best of 26) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.350160 comb 0.350000 user 0.320000 sys 0.030000 (best of 28) ! read batch ! wall 0.024777 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 119) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.024895 comb 0.030000 user 0.000000 sys 0.030000 (best of 118) ! chunk ! wall 2.514061 comb 2.520000 user 2.480000 sys 0.040000 (best of 4) ! chunk batch ! wall 2.380788 comb 2.380000 user 2.360000 sys 0.020000 (best of 5) ! compress ! wall 9.815297 comb 9.820000 user 9.820000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) We already see some interesting data, such as how much slower non-batched chunk reading is and that zlib compression appears to be >2x slower than decompression. I didn't have the data when I wrote this commit message, but I ran this on Mozilla's NFS-based Mercurial server and the time for reading with a reused file descriptor was faster. So I think it is worth testing both with and without file descriptor reuse so we can make informed decisions about recycling file descriptors.

File last commit:

r30402:945f8229 default
r30451:94ca0e13 default
Show More
test-ancestor.py
262 lines | 8.2 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function
import binascii
import getopt
import math
import os
import random
import sys
import time
from mercurial.node import nullrev
from mercurial import (
ancestor,
debugcommands,
hg,
ui as uimod,
util,
)
def buildgraph(rng, nodes=100, rootprob=0.05, mergeprob=0.2, prevprob=0.7):
'''nodes: total number of nodes in the graph
rootprob: probability that a new node (not 0) will be a root
mergeprob: probability that, excluding a root a node will be a merge
prevprob: probability that p1 will be the previous node
return value is a graph represented as an adjacency list.
'''
graph = [None] * nodes
for i in xrange(nodes):
if i == 0 or rng.random() < rootprob:
graph[i] = [nullrev]
elif i == 1:
graph[i] = [0]
elif rng.random() < mergeprob:
if i == 2 or rng.random() < prevprob:
# p1 is prev
p1 = i - 1
else:
p1 = rng.randrange(i - 1)
p2 = rng.choice(range(0, p1) + range(p1 + 1, i))
graph[i] = [p1, p2]
elif rng.random() < prevprob:
graph[i] = [i - 1]
else:
graph[i] = [rng.randrange(i - 1)]
return graph
def buildancestorsets(graph):
ancs = [None] * len(graph)
for i in xrange(len(graph)):
ancs[i] = set([i])
if graph[i] == [nullrev]:
continue
for p in graph[i]:
ancs[i].update(ancs[p])
return ancs
class naiveincrementalmissingancestors(object):
def __init__(self, ancs, bases):
self.ancs = ancs
self.bases = set(bases)
def addbases(self, newbases):
self.bases.update(newbases)
def removeancestorsfrom(self, revs):
for base in self.bases:
if base != nullrev:
revs.difference_update(self.ancs[base])
revs.discard(nullrev)
def missingancestors(self, revs):
res = set()
for rev in revs:
if rev != nullrev:
res.update(self.ancs[rev])
for base in self.bases:
if base != nullrev:
res.difference_update(self.ancs[base])
return sorted(res)
def test_missingancestors(seed, rng):
# empirically observed to take around 1 second
graphcount = 100
testcount = 10
inccount = 10
nerrs = [0]
# the default mu and sigma give us a nice distribution of mostly
# single-digit counts (including 0) with some higher ones
def lognormrandom(mu, sigma):
return int(math.floor(rng.lognormvariate(mu, sigma)))
def samplerevs(nodes, mu=1.1, sigma=0.8):
count = min(lognormrandom(mu, sigma), len(nodes))
return rng.sample(nodes, count)
def err(seed, graph, bases, seq, output, expected):
if nerrs[0] == 0:
print('seed:', hex(seed)[:-1], file=sys.stderr)
if gerrs[0] == 0:
print('graph:', graph, file=sys.stderr)
print('* bases:', bases, file=sys.stderr)
print('* seq: ', seq, file=sys.stderr)
print('* output: ', output, file=sys.stderr)
print('* expected:', expected, file=sys.stderr)
nerrs[0] += 1
gerrs[0] += 1
for g in xrange(graphcount):
graph = buildgraph(rng)
ancs = buildancestorsets(graph)
gerrs = [0]
for _ in xrange(testcount):
# start from nullrev to include it as a possibility
graphnodes = range(nullrev, len(graph))
bases = samplerevs(graphnodes)
# fast algorithm
inc = ancestor.incrementalmissingancestors(graph.__getitem__, bases)
# reference slow algorithm
naiveinc = naiveincrementalmissingancestors(ancs, bases)
seq = []
revs = []
for _ in xrange(inccount):
if rng.random() < 0.2:
newbases = samplerevs(graphnodes)
seq.append(('addbases', newbases))
inc.addbases(newbases)
naiveinc.addbases(newbases)
if rng.random() < 0.4:
# larger set so that there are more revs to remove from
revs = samplerevs(graphnodes, mu=1.5)
seq.append(('removeancestorsfrom', revs))
hrevs = set(revs)
rrevs = set(revs)
inc.removeancestorsfrom(hrevs)
naiveinc.removeancestorsfrom(rrevs)
if hrevs != rrevs:
err(seed, graph, bases, seq, sorted(hrevs),
sorted(rrevs))
else:
revs = samplerevs(graphnodes)
seq.append(('missingancestors', revs))
h = inc.missingancestors(revs)
r = naiveinc.missingancestors(revs)
if h != r:
err(seed, graph, bases, seq, h, r)
# graph is a dict of child->parent adjacency lists for this graph:
# o 13
# |
# | o 12
# | |
# | | o 11
# | | |\
# | | | | o 10
# | | | | |
# | o---+ | 9
# | | | | |
# o | | | | 8
# / / / /
# | | o | 7
# | | | |
# o---+ | 6
# / / /
# | | o 5
# | |/
# | o 4
# | |
# o | 3
# | |
# | o 2
# |/
# o 1
# |
# o 0
graph = {0: [-1], 1: [0], 2: [1], 3: [1], 4: [2], 5: [4], 6: [4],
7: [4], 8: [-1], 9: [6, 7], 10: [5], 11: [3, 7], 12: [9],
13: [8]}
def genlazyancestors(revs, stoprev=0, inclusive=False):
print(("%% lazy ancestor set for %s, stoprev = %s, inclusive = %s" %
(revs, stoprev, inclusive)))
return ancestor.lazyancestors(graph.get, revs, stoprev=stoprev,
inclusive=inclusive)
def printlazyancestors(s, l):
print('membership: %r' % [n for n in l if n in s])
print('iteration: %r' % list(s))
def test_lazyancestors():
# Empty revs
s = genlazyancestors([])
printlazyancestors(s, [3, 0, -1])
# Standard example
s = genlazyancestors([11, 13])
printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])
# Standard with ancestry in the initial set (1 is ancestor of 3)
s = genlazyancestors([1, 3])
printlazyancestors(s, [1, -1, 0])
# Including revs
s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], inclusive=True)
printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])
# Test with stoprev
s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], stoprev=6)
printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])
s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], stoprev=6, inclusive=True)
printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0])
# The C gca algorithm requires a real repo. These are textual descriptions of
# DAGs that have been known to be problematic.
dagtests = [
'+2*2*2/*3/2',
'+3*3/*2*2/*4*4/*4/2*4/2*2',
]
def test_gca():
u = uimod.ui()
for i, dag in enumerate(dagtests):
repo = hg.repository(u, 'gca%d' % i, create=1)
cl = repo.changelog
if not util.safehasattr(cl.index, 'ancestors'):
# C version not available
return
debugcommands.debugbuilddag(u, repo, dag)
# Compare the results of the Python and C versions. This does not
# include choosing a winner when more than one gca exists -- we make
# sure both return exactly the same set of gcas.
for a in cl:
for b in cl:
cgcas = sorted(cl.index.ancestors(a, b))
pygcas = sorted(ancestor.ancestors(cl.parentrevs, a, b))
if cgcas != pygcas:
print("test_gca: for dag %s, gcas for %d, %d:"
% (dag, a, b))
print(" C returned: %s" % cgcas)
print(" Python returned: %s" % pygcas)
def main():
seed = None
opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], 's:', ['seed='])
for o, a in opts:
if o in ('-s', '--seed'):
seed = long(a, base=0) # accepts base 10 or 16 strings
if seed is None:
try:
seed = long(binascii.hexlify(os.urandom(16)), 16)
except AttributeError:
seed = long(time.time() * 1000)
rng = random.Random(seed)
test_missingancestors(seed, rng)
test_lazyancestors()
test_gca()
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()