##// END OF EJS Templates
upstream » mercurial-mirror
RSS

Clone from https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-all

perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations...
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations Upcoming commits will teach revlogs to leverage the new compression engine API so that new compression formats can more easily be leveraged in revlogs. We want to be sure this refactoring doesn't regress performance. So this commit introduces "perfrevchunks" to explicitly test performance of reading, decompressing, and recompressing revlog chunks. Here is output when run on the mozilla-unified repo: $ hg perfrevlogchunks -c ! read ! wall 0.346603 comb 0.350000 user 0.340000 sys 0.010000 (best of 28) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.337707 comb 0.340000 user 0.320000 sys 0.020000 (best of 30) ! read batch ! wall 0.013206 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 221) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.013259 comb 0.030000 user 0.010000 sys 0.020000 (best of 222) ! chunk ! wall 1.909939 comb 1.910000 user 1.900000 sys 0.010000 (best of 6) ! chunk batch ! wall 1.750677 comb 1.760000 user 1.740000 sys 0.020000 (best of 6) ! compress ! wall 5.668004 comb 5.670000 user 5.670000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) $ hg perfrevlogchunks -m ! read ! wall 0.365834 comb 0.370000 user 0.350000 sys 0.020000 (best of 26) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.350160 comb 0.350000 user 0.320000 sys 0.030000 (best of 28) ! read batch ! wall 0.024777 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 119) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.024895 comb 0.030000 user 0.000000 sys 0.030000 (best of 118) ! chunk ! wall 2.514061 comb 2.520000 user 2.480000 sys 0.040000 (best of 4) ! chunk batch ! wall 2.380788 comb 2.380000 user 2.360000 sys 0.020000 (best of 5) ! compress ! wall 9.815297 comb 9.820000 user 9.820000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) We already see some interesting data, such as how much slower non-batched chunk reading is and that zlib compression appears to be >2x slower than decompression. I didn't have the data when I wrote this commit message, but I ran this on Mozilla's NFS-based Mercurial server and the time for reading with a reused file descriptor was faster. So I think it is worth testing both with and without file descriptor reuse so we can make informed decisions about recycling file descriptors.
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso - - Load All Authors

File last commit:

r25007:7c324f65 default
r30451:94ca0e13 default
Show More
test-bisect3.t
249 lines | 6.0 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-bisect3.t
History | Annotation | Raw |Copy content |Copy permalink
# Here we create a simple DAG which has just enough of the required
# topology to test all the bisection status labels:
#
# 13--14
# /
# 0--1--2--3---------9--10--11--12
# \ /
# 4--5--6--7--8
$ hg init
$ echo '0' >a
$ hg add a
$ hg ci -u test -d '0 0' -m '0'
$ echo '1' >a
$ hg ci -u test -d '1 0' -m '1'
branch 2-3
$ echo '2' >b
$ hg add b
$ hg ci -u test -d '2 0' -m '2'
$ echo '3' >b
$ hg ci -u test -d '3 0' -m '3'
branch 4-8
$ hg up -r 1
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo '4' >c
$ hg add c
$ hg ci -u test -d '4 0' -m '4'
created new head
$ echo '5' >c
$ hg ci -u test -d '5 0' -m '5'
$ echo '6' >c
$ hg ci -u test -d '6 0' -m '6'
$ echo '7' >c
$ hg ci -u test -d '7 0' -m '7'
$ echo '8' >c
$ hg ci -u test -d '8 0' -m '8'
merge
$ hg merge -r 3
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg ci -u test -d '9 0' -m '9=8+3'
$ echo '10' >a
$ hg ci -u test -d '10 0' -m '10'
$ echo '11' >a
$ hg ci -u test -d '11 0' -m '11'
$ echo '12' >a
$ hg ci -u test -d '12 0' -m '12'
unrelated branch
$ hg up -r 3
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo '13' >d
$ hg add d
$ hg ci -u test -d '13 0' -m '13'
created new head
$ echo '14' >d
$ hg ci -u test -d '14 0' -m '14'
mark changesets
$ hg bisect --reset
$ hg bisect --good 4
$ hg bisect --good 6
$ hg bisect --bad 12
Testing changeset 9:2197c557e14c (6 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg bisect --bad 10
Testing changeset 8:e74a86251f58 (4 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg bisect --skip 7
Testing changeset 8:e74a86251f58 (4 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
test template
$ hg log --template '{rev}:{node|short} {bisect}\n'
14:cbf2f3105bbf
13:e07efca37c43
12:98c6b56349c0 bad
11:03f491376e63 bad (implicit)
10:c012b15e2409 bad
9:2197c557e14c untested
8:e74a86251f58 untested
7:a5f87041c899 skipped
6:7d997bedcd8d good
5:2dd1875f1028 good (implicit)
4:2a1daef14cd4 good
3:8417d459b90c ignored
2:e1355ee1f23e ignored
1:ce7c85e06a9f good (implicit)
0:b4e73ffab476 good (implicit)
$ hg log --template '{bisect|shortbisect} {rev}:{node|short}\n'
14:cbf2f3105bbf
13:e07efca37c43
B 12:98c6b56349c0
B 11:03f491376e63
B 10:c012b15e2409
U 9:2197c557e14c
U 8:e74a86251f58
S 7:a5f87041c899
G 6:7d997bedcd8d
G 5:2dd1875f1028
G 4:2a1daef14cd4
I 3:8417d459b90c
I 2:e1355ee1f23e
G 1:ce7c85e06a9f
G 0:b4e73ffab476
test style
$ hg log --style bisect
changeset: 14:cbf2f3105bbf
bisect:
tag: tip
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:14 1970 +0000
summary: 14
changeset: 13:e07efca37c43
bisect:
parent: 3:8417d459b90c
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000
summary: 13
changeset: 12:98c6b56349c0
bisect: bad
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:12 1970 +0000
summary: 12
changeset: 11:03f491376e63
bisect: bad (implicit)
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:11 1970 +0000
summary: 11
changeset: 10:c012b15e2409
bisect: bad
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:10 1970 +0000
summary: 10
changeset: 9:2197c557e14c
bisect: untested
parent: 8:e74a86251f58
parent: 3:8417d459b90c
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000
summary: 9=8+3
changeset: 8:e74a86251f58
bisect: untested
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:08 1970 +0000
summary: 8
changeset: 7:a5f87041c899
bisect: skipped
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:07 1970 +0000
summary: 7
changeset: 6:7d997bedcd8d
bisect: good
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:06 1970 +0000
summary: 6
changeset: 5:2dd1875f1028
bisect: good (implicit)
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:05 1970 +0000
summary: 5
changeset: 4:2a1daef14cd4
bisect: good
parent: 1:ce7c85e06a9f
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:04 1970 +0000
summary: 4
changeset: 3:8417d459b90c
bisect: ignored
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:03 1970 +0000
summary: 3
changeset: 2:e1355ee1f23e
bisect: ignored
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:02 1970 +0000
summary: 2
changeset: 1:ce7c85e06a9f
bisect: good (implicit)
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:01 1970 +0000
summary: 1
changeset: 0:b4e73ffab476
bisect: good (implicit)
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: 0
$ hg log --quiet --style bisect
14:cbf2f3105bbf
13:e07efca37c43
B 12:98c6b56349c0
B 11:03f491376e63
B 10:c012b15e2409
U 9:2197c557e14c
U 8:e74a86251f58
S 7:a5f87041c899
G 6:7d997bedcd8d
G 5:2dd1875f1028
G 4:2a1daef14cd4
I 3:8417d459b90c
I 2:e1355ee1f23e
G 1:ce7c85e06a9f
G 0:b4e73ffab476
$ hg --config extensions.color= --color=debug log --quiet --style bisect
[log.bisect| ] 14:cbf2f3105bbf
[log.bisect| ] 13:e07efca37c43
[log.bisect bisect.bad|B] 12:98c6b56349c0
[log.bisect bisect.bad|B] 11:03f491376e63
[log.bisect bisect.bad|B] 10:c012b15e2409
[log.bisect bisect.untested|U] 9:2197c557e14c
[log.bisect bisect.untested|U] 8:e74a86251f58
[log.bisect bisect.skipped|S] 7:a5f87041c899
[log.bisect bisect.good|G] 6:7d997bedcd8d
[log.bisect bisect.good|G] 5:2dd1875f1028
[log.bisect bisect.good|G] 4:2a1daef14cd4
[log.bisect bisect.ignored|I] 3:8417d459b90c
[log.bisect bisect.ignored|I] 2:e1355ee1f23e
[log.bisect bisect.good|G] 1:ce7c85e06a9f
[log.bisect bisect.good|G] 0:b4e73ffab476