##// END OF EJS Templates
upstream » mercurial-mirror
RSS

Clone from https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-all

perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations...
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations Upcoming commits will teach revlogs to leverage the new compression engine API so that new compression formats can more easily be leveraged in revlogs. We want to be sure this refactoring doesn't regress performance. So this commit introduces "perfrevchunks" to explicitly test performance of reading, decompressing, and recompressing revlog chunks. Here is output when run on the mozilla-unified repo: $ hg perfrevlogchunks -c ! read ! wall 0.346603 comb 0.350000 user 0.340000 sys 0.010000 (best of 28) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.337707 comb 0.340000 user 0.320000 sys 0.020000 (best of 30) ! read batch ! wall 0.013206 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 221) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.013259 comb 0.030000 user 0.010000 sys 0.020000 (best of 222) ! chunk ! wall 1.909939 comb 1.910000 user 1.900000 sys 0.010000 (best of 6) ! chunk batch ! wall 1.750677 comb 1.760000 user 1.740000 sys 0.020000 (best of 6) ! compress ! wall 5.668004 comb 5.670000 user 5.670000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) $ hg perfrevlogchunks -m ! read ! wall 0.365834 comb 0.370000 user 0.350000 sys 0.020000 (best of 26) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.350160 comb 0.350000 user 0.320000 sys 0.030000 (best of 28) ! read batch ! wall 0.024777 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 119) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.024895 comb 0.030000 user 0.000000 sys 0.030000 (best of 118) ! chunk ! wall 2.514061 comb 2.520000 user 2.480000 sys 0.040000 (best of 4) ! chunk batch ! wall 2.380788 comb 2.380000 user 2.360000 sys 0.020000 (best of 5) ! compress ! wall 9.815297 comb 9.820000 user 9.820000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) We already see some interesting data, such as how much slower non-batched chunk reading is and that zlib compression appears to be >2x slower than decompression. I didn't have the data when I wrote this commit message, but I ran this on Mozilla's NFS-based Mercurial server and the time for reading with a reused file descriptor was faster. So I think it is worth testing both with and without file descriptor reuse so we can make informed decisions about recycling file descriptors.
Stephen Lee - - Load All Authors

File last commit:

r21503:10f15e34 default
r30451:94ca0e13 default
Show More
test-bookmarks-merge.t
152 lines | 4.1 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-bookmarks-merge.t
History | Annotation | Raw |Copy content |Copy permalink
# init
$ hg init
$ echo a > a
$ hg add a
$ hg commit -m'a'
$ echo b > b
$ hg add b
$ hg commit -m'b'
$ hg up -C 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo c > c
$ hg add c
$ hg commit -m'c'
created new head
# test merging of diverged bookmarks
$ hg bookmark -r 1 "c@diverge"
$ hg bookmark -r 1 b
$ hg bookmark c
$ hg bookmarks
b 1:d2ae7f538514
* c 2:d36c0562f908
c@diverge 1:d2ae7f538514
$ hg merge "c@diverge"
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg commit -m'merge'
$ hg bookmarks
b 1:d2ae7f538514
* c 3:b8f96cf4688b
$ hg up -C 3
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(leaving bookmark c)
$ echo d > d
$ hg add d
$ hg commit -m'd'
$ hg up -C 3
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo e > e
$ hg add e
$ hg commit -m'e'
created new head
$ hg up -C 5
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg bookmark e
$ hg bookmarks
b 1:d2ae7f538514
c 3:b8f96cf4688b
* e 5:26bee9c5bcf3
# the picked side is bookmarked
$ hg up -C 4
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(leaving bookmark e)
$ hg merge
abort: heads are bookmarked - please merge with an explicit rev
(run 'hg heads' to see all heads)
[255]
# our revision is bookmarked
$ hg up -C e
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(activating bookmark e)
$ hg merge
abort: no matching bookmark to merge - please merge with an explicit rev or bookmark
(run 'hg heads' to see all heads)
[255]
# merge bookmark heads
$ hg up -C 4
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(leaving bookmark e)
$ echo f > f
$ hg commit -Am "f"
adding f
$ hg bookmarks -r 4 "e@diverged"
$ hg up -q -C "e@diverged"
$ hg merge
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg parents
changeset: 4:a0546fcfe0fb
bookmark: e@diverged
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: d
changeset: 5:26bee9c5bcf3
bookmark: e
parent: 3:b8f96cf4688b
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: e
$ hg up -C e
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(activating bookmark e)
$ hg bookmarks
b 1:d2ae7f538514
c 3:b8f96cf4688b
* e 5:26bee9c5bcf3
e@diverged 4:a0546fcfe0fb
$ hg merge
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg commit -m'merge'
$ hg bookmarks
b 1:d2ae7f538514
c 3:b8f96cf4688b
* e 7:ca784329f0ba
# test warning when all heads are inactive bookmarks
$ hg up -C 6
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(leaving bookmark e)
$ echo g > g
$ hg commit -Am 'g'
adding g
$ hg bookmark -i g
$ hg bookmarks
b 1:d2ae7f538514
c 3:b8f96cf4688b
e 7:ca784329f0ba
g 8:04dd21731d95
$ hg heads
changeset: 8:04dd21731d95
bookmark: g
tag: tip
parent: 6:be381d1126a0
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: g
changeset: 7:ca784329f0ba
bookmark: e
parent: 5:26bee9c5bcf3
parent: 4:a0546fcfe0fb
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: merge
$ hg merge
abort: heads are bookmarked - please merge with an explicit rev
(run 'hg heads' to see all heads)
[255]