##// END OF EJS Templates
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations...
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations Upcoming commits will teach revlogs to leverage the new compression engine API so that new compression formats can more easily be leveraged in revlogs. We want to be sure this refactoring doesn't regress performance. So this commit introduces "perfrevchunks" to explicitly test performance of reading, decompressing, and recompressing revlog chunks. Here is output when run on the mozilla-unified repo: $ hg perfrevlogchunks -c ! read ! wall 0.346603 comb 0.350000 user 0.340000 sys 0.010000 (best of 28) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.337707 comb 0.340000 user 0.320000 sys 0.020000 (best of 30) ! read batch ! wall 0.013206 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 221) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.013259 comb 0.030000 user 0.010000 sys 0.020000 (best of 222) ! chunk ! wall 1.909939 comb 1.910000 user 1.900000 sys 0.010000 (best of 6) ! chunk batch ! wall 1.750677 comb 1.760000 user 1.740000 sys 0.020000 (best of 6) ! compress ! wall 5.668004 comb 5.670000 user 5.670000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) $ hg perfrevlogchunks -m ! read ! wall 0.365834 comb 0.370000 user 0.350000 sys 0.020000 (best of 26) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.350160 comb 0.350000 user 0.320000 sys 0.030000 (best of 28) ! read batch ! wall 0.024777 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 119) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.024895 comb 0.030000 user 0.000000 sys 0.030000 (best of 118) ! chunk ! wall 2.514061 comb 2.520000 user 2.480000 sys 0.040000 (best of 4) ! chunk batch ! wall 2.380788 comb 2.380000 user 2.360000 sys 0.020000 (best of 5) ! compress ! wall 9.815297 comb 9.820000 user 9.820000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) We already see some interesting data, such as how much slower non-batched chunk reading is and that zlib compression appears to be >2x slower than decompression. I didn't have the data when I wrote this commit message, but I ran this on Mozilla's NFS-based Mercurial server and the time for reading with a reused file descriptor was faster. So I think it is worth testing both with and without file descriptor reuse so we can make informed decisions about recycling file descriptors.

File last commit:

r30332:318a24b5 default
r30451:94ca0e13 default
Show More
test-generaldelta.t
161 lines | 5.9 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
Check whether size of generaldelta revlog is not bigger than its
regular equivalent. Test would fail if generaldelta was naive
implementation of parentdelta: third manifest revision would be fully
inserted due to big distance from its paren revision (zero).
$ hg init repo --config format.generaldelta=no --config format.usegeneraldelta=no
$ cd repo
$ echo foo > foo
$ echo bar > bar
$ echo baz > baz
$ hg commit -q -Am boo
$ hg clone --pull . ../gdrepo -q --config format.generaldelta=yes
$ for r in 1 2 3; do
> echo $r > foo
> hg commit -q -m $r
> hg up -q -r 0
> hg pull . -q -r $r -R ../gdrepo
> done
$ cd ..
>>> from __future__ import print_function
>>> import os
>>> regsize = os.stat("repo/.hg/store/00manifest.i").st_size
>>> gdsize = os.stat("gdrepo/.hg/store/00manifest.i").st_size
>>> if regsize < gdsize:
... print('generaldata increased size of manifest')
Verify rev reordering doesnt create invalid bundles (issue4462)
This requires a commit tree that when pulled will reorder manifest revs such
that the second manifest to create a file rev will be ordered before the first
manifest to create that file rev. We also need to do a partial pull to ensure
reordering happens. At the end we verify the linkrev points at the earliest
commit.
$ hg init server --config format.generaldelta=True
$ cd server
$ touch a
$ hg commit -Aqm a
$ echo x > x
$ echo y > y
$ hg commit -Aqm xy
$ hg up -q '.^'
$ echo x > x
$ echo z > z
$ hg commit -Aqm xz
$ hg up -q 1
$ echo b > b
$ hg commit -Aqm b
$ hg merge -q 2
$ hg commit -Aqm merge
$ echo c > c
$ hg commit -Aqm c
$ hg log -G -T '{rev} {shortest(node)} {desc}'
@ 5 ebb8 c
|
o 4 baf7 merge
|\
| o 3 a129 b
| |
o | 2 958c xz
| |
| o 1 f00c xy
|/
o 0 3903 a
$ cd ..
$ hg init client --config format.generaldelta=false --config format.usegeneraldelta=false
$ cd client
$ hg pull -q ../server -r 4
$ hg debugindex x
rev offset length base linkrev nodeid p1 p2
0 0 3 0 1 1406e7411862 000000000000 000000000000
$ cd ..
Test "usegeneraldelta" config
(repo are general delta, but incoming bundle are not re-deltafied)
delta coming from the server base delta server are not recompressed.
(also include the aggressive version for comparison)
$ hg clone repo --pull --config format.usegeneraldelta=1 usegd
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 4 changesets with 6 changes to 3 files (+2 heads)
updating to branch default
3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg clone repo --pull --config format.generaldelta=1 full
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 4 changesets with 6 changes to 3 files (+2 heads)
updating to branch default
3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg -R repo debugindex -m
rev offset length base linkrev nodeid p1 p2
0 0 104 0 0 cef96823c800 000000000000 000000000000
1 104 57 0 1 58ab9a8d541d cef96823c800 000000000000
2 161 57 0 2 134fdc6fd680 cef96823c800 000000000000
3 218 104 3 3 723508934dad cef96823c800 000000000000
$ hg -R usegd debugindex -m
rev offset length delta linkrev nodeid p1 p2
0 0 104 -1 0 cef96823c800 000000000000 000000000000
1 104 57 0 1 58ab9a8d541d cef96823c800 000000000000
2 161 57 1 2 134fdc6fd680 cef96823c800 000000000000
3 218 57 0 3 723508934dad cef96823c800 000000000000
$ hg -R full debugindex -m
rev offset length delta linkrev nodeid p1 p2
0 0 104 -1 0 cef96823c800 000000000000 000000000000
1 104 57 0 1 58ab9a8d541d cef96823c800 000000000000
2 161 57 0 2 134fdc6fd680 cef96823c800 000000000000
3 218 57 0 3 723508934dad cef96823c800 000000000000
Test format.aggressivemergedeltas
$ hg init --config format.generaldelta=1 aggressive
$ cd aggressive
$ cat << EOF >> .hg/hgrc
> [format]
> generaldelta = 1
> EOF
$ touch a b c d e
$ hg commit -Aqm side1
$ hg up -q null
$ touch x y
$ hg commit -Aqm side2
- Verify non-aggressive merge uses p1 (commit 1) as delta parent
$ hg merge -q 0
$ hg commit -q -m merge
$ hg debugindex -m
rev offset length delta linkrev nodeid p1 p2
0 0 59 -1 0 8dde941edb6e 000000000000 000000000000
1 59 61 0 1 315c023f341d 000000000000 000000000000
2 120 65 1 2 2ab389a983eb 315c023f341d 8dde941edb6e
$ hg strip -q -r . --config extensions.strip=
- Verify aggressive merge uses p2 (commit 0) as delta parent
$ hg up -q -C 1
$ hg merge -q 0
$ hg commit -q -m merge --config format.aggressivemergedeltas=True
$ hg debugindex -m
rev offset length delta linkrev nodeid p1 p2
0 0 59 -1 0 8dde941edb6e 000000000000 000000000000
1 59 61 0 1 315c023f341d 000000000000 000000000000
2 120 62 0 2 2ab389a983eb 315c023f341d 8dde941edb6e
Test that strip bundle use bundle2
$ hg --config extensions.strip= strip .
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 5 files removed, 0 files unresolved
saved backup bundle to $TESTTMP/aggressive/.hg/strip-backup/1c5d4dc9a8b8-6c68e60c-backup.hg (glob)
$ hg debugbundle .hg/strip-backup/*
Stream params: sortdict([('Compression', 'BZ')])
changegroup -- "sortdict([('version', '02'), ('nbchanges', '1')])"
1c5d4dc9a8b8d6e1750966d343e94db665e7a1e9
$ cd ..