##// END OF EJS Templates
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations...
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations Upcoming commits will teach revlogs to leverage the new compression engine API so that new compression formats can more easily be leveraged in revlogs. We want to be sure this refactoring doesn't regress performance. So this commit introduces "perfrevchunks" to explicitly test performance of reading, decompressing, and recompressing revlog chunks. Here is output when run on the mozilla-unified repo: $ hg perfrevlogchunks -c ! read ! wall 0.346603 comb 0.350000 user 0.340000 sys 0.010000 (best of 28) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.337707 comb 0.340000 user 0.320000 sys 0.020000 (best of 30) ! read batch ! wall 0.013206 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 221) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.013259 comb 0.030000 user 0.010000 sys 0.020000 (best of 222) ! chunk ! wall 1.909939 comb 1.910000 user 1.900000 sys 0.010000 (best of 6) ! chunk batch ! wall 1.750677 comb 1.760000 user 1.740000 sys 0.020000 (best of 6) ! compress ! wall 5.668004 comb 5.670000 user 5.670000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) $ hg perfrevlogchunks -m ! read ! wall 0.365834 comb 0.370000 user 0.350000 sys 0.020000 (best of 26) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.350160 comb 0.350000 user 0.320000 sys 0.030000 (best of 28) ! read batch ! wall 0.024777 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 119) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.024895 comb 0.030000 user 0.000000 sys 0.030000 (best of 118) ! chunk ! wall 2.514061 comb 2.520000 user 2.480000 sys 0.040000 (best of 4) ! chunk batch ! wall 2.380788 comb 2.380000 user 2.360000 sys 0.020000 (best of 5) ! compress ! wall 9.815297 comb 9.820000 user 9.820000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) We already see some interesting data, such as how much slower non-batched chunk reading is and that zlib compression appears to be >2x slower than decompression. I didn't have the data when I wrote this commit message, but I ran this on Mozilla's NFS-based Mercurial server and the time for reading with a reused file descriptor was faster. So I think it is worth testing both with and without file descriptor reuse so we can make informed decisions about recycling file descriptors.

File last commit:

r30238:9843e3d9 stable
r30451:94ca0e13 default
Show More
test-journal-share.t
153 lines | 4.5 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-journal-share.t
Journal extension test: tests the share extension support
$ cat >> testmocks.py << EOF
> # mock out util.getuser() and util.makedate() to supply testable values
> import os
> from mercurial import util
> def mockgetuser():
> return 'foobar'
>
> def mockmakedate():
> filename = os.path.join(os.environ['TESTTMP'], 'testtime')
> try:
> with open(filename, 'rb') as timef:
> time = float(timef.read()) + 1
> except IOError:
> time = 0.0
> with open(filename, 'wb') as timef:
> timef.write(str(time))
> return (time, 0)
>
> util.getuser = mockgetuser
> util.makedate = mockmakedate
> EOF
$ cat >> $HGRCPATH << EOF
> [extensions]
> journal=
> share=
> testmocks=`pwd`/testmocks.py
> [remotenames]
> rename.default=remote
> EOF
$ hg init repo
$ cd repo
$ hg bookmark bm
$ touch file0
$ hg commit -Am file0-added
adding file0
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
0fd3805711f9 . commit -Am file0-added
0fd3805711f9 bm commit -Am file0-added
A shared working copy initially receives the same bookmarks and working copy
$ cd ..
$ hg share repo shared1
updating working directory
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd shared1
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
0fd3805711f9 . share repo shared1
unless you explicitly share bookmarks
$ cd ..
$ hg share --bookmarks repo shared2
updating working directory
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd shared2
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
0fd3805711f9 . share --bookmarks repo shared2
0fd3805711f9 bm commit -Am file0-added
Moving the bookmark in the original repository is only shown in the repository
that shares bookmarks
$ cd ../repo
$ touch file1
$ hg commit -Am file1-added
adding file1
$ cd ../shared1
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
0fd3805711f9 . share repo shared1
$ cd ../shared2
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
4f354088b094 bm commit -Am file1-added
0fd3805711f9 . share --bookmarks repo shared2
0fd3805711f9 bm commit -Am file0-added
But working copy changes are always 'local'
$ cd ../repo
$ hg up 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(leaving bookmark bm)
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
0fd3805711f9 . up 0
4f354088b094 . commit -Am file1-added
4f354088b094 bm commit -Am file1-added
0fd3805711f9 . commit -Am file0-added
0fd3805711f9 bm commit -Am file0-added
$ cd ../shared2
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
4f354088b094 bm commit -Am file1-added
0fd3805711f9 . share --bookmarks repo shared2
0fd3805711f9 bm commit -Am file0-added
$ hg up tip
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg up 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg journal
previous locations of '.':
0fd3805711f9 up 0
4f354088b094 up tip
0fd3805711f9 share --bookmarks repo shared2
Unsharing works as expected; the journal remains consistent
$ cd ../shared1
$ hg unshare
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
0fd3805711f9 . share repo shared1
$ cd ../shared2
$ hg unshare
$ hg journal --all
previous locations of the working copy and bookmarks:
0fd3805711f9 . up 0
4f354088b094 . up tip
4f354088b094 bm commit -Am file1-added
0fd3805711f9 . share --bookmarks repo shared2
0fd3805711f9 bm commit -Am file0-added
New journal entries in the source repo no longer show up in the other working copies
$ cd ../repo
$ hg bookmark newbm -r tip
$ hg journal newbm
previous locations of 'newbm':
4f354088b094 bookmark newbm -r tip
$ cd ../shared2
$ hg journal newbm
previous locations of 'newbm':
no recorded locations
This applies for both directions
$ hg bookmark shared2bm -r tip
$ hg journal shared2bm
previous locations of 'shared2bm':
4f354088b094 bookmark shared2bm -r tip
$ cd ../repo
$ hg journal shared2bm
previous locations of 'shared2bm':
no recorded locations