##// END OF EJS Templates
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations...
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations Upcoming commits will teach revlogs to leverage the new compression engine API so that new compression formats can more easily be leveraged in revlogs. We want to be sure this refactoring doesn't regress performance. So this commit introduces "perfrevchunks" to explicitly test performance of reading, decompressing, and recompressing revlog chunks. Here is output when run on the mozilla-unified repo: $ hg perfrevlogchunks -c ! read ! wall 0.346603 comb 0.350000 user 0.340000 sys 0.010000 (best of 28) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.337707 comb 0.340000 user 0.320000 sys 0.020000 (best of 30) ! read batch ! wall 0.013206 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 221) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.013259 comb 0.030000 user 0.010000 sys 0.020000 (best of 222) ! chunk ! wall 1.909939 comb 1.910000 user 1.900000 sys 0.010000 (best of 6) ! chunk batch ! wall 1.750677 comb 1.760000 user 1.740000 sys 0.020000 (best of 6) ! compress ! wall 5.668004 comb 5.670000 user 5.670000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) $ hg perfrevlogchunks -m ! read ! wall 0.365834 comb 0.370000 user 0.350000 sys 0.020000 (best of 26) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.350160 comb 0.350000 user 0.320000 sys 0.030000 (best of 28) ! read batch ! wall 0.024777 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 119) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.024895 comb 0.030000 user 0.000000 sys 0.030000 (best of 118) ! chunk ! wall 2.514061 comb 2.520000 user 2.480000 sys 0.040000 (best of 4) ! chunk batch ! wall 2.380788 comb 2.380000 user 2.360000 sys 0.020000 (best of 5) ! compress ! wall 9.815297 comb 9.820000 user 9.820000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) We already see some interesting data, such as how much slower non-batched chunk reading is and that zlib compression appears to be >2x slower than decompression. I didn't have the data when I wrote this commit message, but I ran this on Mozilla's NFS-based Mercurial server and the time for reading with a reused file descriptor was faster. So I think it is worth testing both with and without file descriptor reuse so we can make informed decisions about recycling file descriptors.

File last commit:

r30062:940c05b2 default
r30451:94ca0e13 default
Show More
test-rename-dir-merge.t
294 lines | 6.6 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-rename-dir-merge.t
$ hg init t
$ cd t
$ mkdir a
$ echo foo > a/a
$ echo bar > a/b
$ hg ci -Am "0"
adding a/a
adding a/b
$ hg co -C 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg mv a b
moving a/a to b/a (glob)
moving a/b to b/b (glob)
$ hg ci -m "1 mv a/ b/"
$ hg co -C 0
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo baz > a/c
$ echo quux > a/d
$ hg add a/c
$ hg ci -m "2 add a/c"
created new head
$ hg merge --debug 1
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in local:
a/c
unmatched files in other:
b/a
b/b
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: 'a/a' -> dst: 'b/a'
src: 'a/b' -> dst: 'b/b'
checking for directory renames
discovered dir src: 'a/' -> dst: 'b/'
pending file src: 'a/c' -> dst: 'b/c'
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: f9b20c0d4c51, local: ce36d17b18fb+, remote: 397f8b00a740
a/a: other deleted -> r
removing a/a
a/b: other deleted -> r
removing a/b
b/a: remote created -> g
getting b/a
b/b: remote created -> g
getting b/b
b/c: remote directory rename - move from a/c -> dm
moving a/c to b/c (glob)
3 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ echo a/* b/*
a/d b/a b/b b/c
$ hg st -C
M b/a
M b/b
A b/c
a/c
R a/a
R a/b
R a/c
? a/d
$ hg ci -m "3 merge 2+1"
$ hg debugrename b/c
b/c renamed from a/c:354ae8da6e890359ef49ade27b68bbc361f3ca88 (glob)
$ hg co -C 1
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg merge --debug 2
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in local:
b/a
b/b
unmatched files in other:
a/c
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: 'a/a' -> dst: 'b/a'
src: 'a/b' -> dst: 'b/b'
checking for directory renames
discovered dir src: 'a/' -> dst: 'b/'
pending file src: 'a/c' -> dst: 'b/c'
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: f9b20c0d4c51, local: 397f8b00a740+, remote: ce36d17b18fb
starting 4 threads for background file closing (?)
b/c: local directory rename - get from a/c -> dg
getting a/c to b/c
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ echo a/* b/*
a/d b/a b/b b/c
$ hg st -C
A b/c
a/c
? a/d
$ hg ci -m "4 merge 1+2"
created new head
$ hg debugrename b/c
b/c renamed from a/c:354ae8da6e890359ef49ade27b68bbc361f3ca88 (glob)
Local directory rename with conflicting file added in remote source directory
and untracked in local target directory.
$ hg co -qC 1
$ echo target > b/c
$ hg merge 2
b/c: untracked file differs
abort: untracked files in working directory differ from files in requested revision
[255]
$ cat b/c
target
but it should succeed if the content matches
$ hg cat -r 2 a/c > b/c
$ hg merge 2
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg st -C
A b/c
a/c
? a/d
Local directory rename with conflicting file added in remote source directory
and committed in local target directory.
$ hg co -qC 1
$ echo target > b/c
$ hg add b/c
$ hg commit -qm 'new file in target directory'
$ hg merge 2
merging b/c and a/c to b/c
warning: conflicts while merging b/c! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg update -C .' to abandon
[1]
$ hg st -A
M b/c
a/c
? a/d
? b/c.orig
C b/a
C b/b
$ cat b/c
<<<<<<< working copy: f1c50ca4f127 - test: new file in target directory
target
=======
baz
>>>>>>> merge rev: ce36d17b18fb - test: 2 add a/c
$ rm b/c.orig
Remote directory rename with conflicting file added in remote target directory
and committed in local source directory.
$ hg co -qC 2
$ hg st -A
? a/d
C a/a
C a/b
C a/c
$ hg merge 5
merging a/c and b/c to b/c
warning: conflicts while merging b/c! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 1 files unresolved
use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg update -C .' to abandon
[1]
$ hg st -A
M b/a
M b/b
M b/c
a/c
R a/a
R a/b
R a/c
? a/d
? b/c.orig
$ cat b/c
<<<<<<< working copy: ce36d17b18fb - test: 2 add a/c
baz
=======
target
>>>>>>> merge rev: f1c50ca4f127 - test: new file in target directory
Second scenario with two repos:
$ cd ..
$ hg init r1
$ cd r1
$ mkdir a
$ echo foo > a/f
$ hg add a
adding a/f (glob)
$ hg ci -m "a/f == foo"
$ cd ..
$ hg clone r1 r2
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd r2
$ hg mv a b
moving a/f to b/f (glob)
$ echo foo1 > b/f
$ hg ci -m" a -> b, b/f == foo1"
$ cd ..
$ cd r1
$ mkdir a/aa
$ echo bar > a/aa/g
$ hg add a/aa
adding a/aa/g (glob)
$ hg ci -m "a/aa/g"
$ hg pull ../r2
pulling from ../r2
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
(run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
$ hg merge
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg st -C
M b/f
A b/aa/g
a/aa/g
R a/aa/g
R a/f
$ cd ..
Test renames to separate directories
$ hg init a
$ cd a
$ mkdir a
$ touch a/s
$ touch a/t
$ hg ci -Am0
adding a/s
adding a/t
Add more files
$ touch a/s2
$ touch a/t2
$ hg ci -Am1
adding a/s2
adding a/t2
Do moves on a branch
$ hg up 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ mkdir s
$ mkdir t
$ hg mv a/s s
$ hg mv a/t t
$ hg ci -Am2
created new head
$ hg st --copies --change .
A s/s
a/s
A t/t
a/t
R a/s
R a/t
Merge shouldn't move s2, t2
$ hg merge
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg st --copies
M a/s2
M a/t2
Try the merge in the other direction. It may or may not be appropriate for
status to list copies here.
$ hg up -C 1
4 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg merge
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg st --copies
M s/s
M t/t
R a/s
R a/t