##// END OF EJS Templates
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations...
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations Upcoming commits will teach revlogs to leverage the new compression engine API so that new compression formats can more easily be leveraged in revlogs. We want to be sure this refactoring doesn't regress performance. So this commit introduces "perfrevchunks" to explicitly test performance of reading, decompressing, and recompressing revlog chunks. Here is output when run on the mozilla-unified repo: $ hg perfrevlogchunks -c ! read ! wall 0.346603 comb 0.350000 user 0.340000 sys 0.010000 (best of 28) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.337707 comb 0.340000 user 0.320000 sys 0.020000 (best of 30) ! read batch ! wall 0.013206 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 221) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.013259 comb 0.030000 user 0.010000 sys 0.020000 (best of 222) ! chunk ! wall 1.909939 comb 1.910000 user 1.900000 sys 0.010000 (best of 6) ! chunk batch ! wall 1.750677 comb 1.760000 user 1.740000 sys 0.020000 (best of 6) ! compress ! wall 5.668004 comb 5.670000 user 5.670000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) $ hg perfrevlogchunks -m ! read ! wall 0.365834 comb 0.370000 user 0.350000 sys 0.020000 (best of 26) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.350160 comb 0.350000 user 0.320000 sys 0.030000 (best of 28) ! read batch ! wall 0.024777 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 119) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.024895 comb 0.030000 user 0.000000 sys 0.030000 (best of 118) ! chunk ! wall 2.514061 comb 2.520000 user 2.480000 sys 0.040000 (best of 4) ! chunk batch ! wall 2.380788 comb 2.380000 user 2.360000 sys 0.020000 (best of 5) ! compress ! wall 9.815297 comb 9.820000 user 9.820000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) We already see some interesting data, such as how much slower non-batched chunk reading is and that zlib compression appears to be >2x slower than decompression. I didn't have the data when I wrote this commit message, but I ran this on Mozilla's NFS-based Mercurial server and the time for reading with a reused file descriptor was faster. So I think it is worth testing both with and without file descriptor reuse so we can make informed decisions about recycling file descriptors.

File last commit:

r27161:296d55de default
r30451:94ca0e13 default
Show More
test-rename-merge1.t
188 lines | 4.3 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-rename-merge1.t
$ hg init
$ echo "[merge]" >> .hg/hgrc
$ echo "followcopies = 1" >> .hg/hgrc
$ echo foo > a
$ echo foo > a2
$ hg add a a2
$ hg ci -m "start"
$ hg mv a b
$ hg mv a2 b2
$ hg ci -m "rename"
$ hg co 0
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo blahblah > a
$ echo blahblah > a2
$ hg mv a2 c2
$ hg ci -m "modify"
created new head
$ hg merge -y --debug
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in local:
c2
unmatched files in other:
b
b2
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: 'a' -> dst: 'b' *
src: 'a2' -> dst: 'b2' !
src: 'a2' -> dst: 'c2' !
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: af1939970a1c, local: 044f8520aeeb+, remote: 85c198ef2f6c
note: possible conflict - a2 was renamed multiple times to:
c2
b2
preserving a for resolve of b
removing a
b2: remote created -> g
getting b2
b: remote moved from a -> m (premerge)
picked tool ':merge' for b (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
merging a and b to b
my b@044f8520aeeb+ other b@85c198ef2f6c ancestor a@af1939970a1c
premerge successful
1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg status -AC
M b
a
M b2
R a
C c2
$ cat b
blahblah
$ hg ci -m "merge"
$ hg debugindex b
rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re)
0 0 67 ..... 1 57eacc201a7f 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
1 67 72 ..... 3 4727ba907962 000000000000 57eacc201a7f (re)
$ hg debugrename b
b renamed from a:dd03b83622e78778b403775d0d074b9ac7387a66
This used to trigger a "divergent renames" warning, despite no renames
$ hg cp b b3
$ hg cp b b4
$ hg ci -A -m 'copy b twice'
$ hg up eb92d88a9712
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg up
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg rm b3 b4
$ hg ci -m 'clean up a bit of our mess'
We'd rather not warn on divergent renames done in the same changeset (issue2113)
$ hg cp b b3
$ hg mv b b4
$ hg ci -A -m 'divergent renames in same changeset'
$ hg up c761c6948de0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg up
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Check for issue2642
$ hg init t
$ cd t
$ echo c0 > f1
$ hg ci -Aqm0
$ hg up null -q
$ echo c1 > f1 # backport
$ hg ci -Aqm1
$ hg mv f1 f2
$ hg ci -qm2
$ hg up 0 -q
$ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local
$ hg ci -qm3
$ hg merge 2
merging f1 and f2 to f2
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ cat f2
c0
$ cd ..
Check for issue2089
$ hg init repo2089
$ cd repo2089
$ echo c0 > f1
$ hg ci -Aqm0
$ hg up null -q
$ echo c1 > f1
$ hg ci -Aqm1
$ hg up 0 -q
$ hg merge 1 -q --tool internal:local
$ echo c2 > f1
$ hg ci -qm2
$ hg up 1 -q
$ hg mv f1 f2
$ hg ci -Aqm3
$ hg up 2 -q
$ hg merge 3
merging f1 and f2 to f2
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ cat f2
c2
$ cd ..
Check for issue3074
$ hg init repo3074
$ cd repo3074
$ echo foo > file
$ hg add file
$ hg commit -m "added file"
$ hg mv file newfile
$ hg commit -m "renamed file"
$ hg update 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg rm file
$ hg commit -m "deleted file"
created new head
$ hg merge --debug
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in other:
newfile
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: 'file' -> dst: 'newfile' %
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: 19d7f95df299, local: 0084274f6b67+, remote: 5d32493049f0
note: possible conflict - file was deleted and renamed to:
newfile
newfile: remote created -> g
getting newfile
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg status
M newfile
$ cd ..