##// END OF EJS Templates
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations...
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations Upcoming commits will teach revlogs to leverage the new compression engine API so that new compression formats can more easily be leveraged in revlogs. We want to be sure this refactoring doesn't regress performance. So this commit introduces "perfrevchunks" to explicitly test performance of reading, decompressing, and recompressing revlog chunks. Here is output when run on the mozilla-unified repo: $ hg perfrevlogchunks -c ! read ! wall 0.346603 comb 0.350000 user 0.340000 sys 0.010000 (best of 28) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.337707 comb 0.340000 user 0.320000 sys 0.020000 (best of 30) ! read batch ! wall 0.013206 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 221) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.013259 comb 0.030000 user 0.010000 sys 0.020000 (best of 222) ! chunk ! wall 1.909939 comb 1.910000 user 1.900000 sys 0.010000 (best of 6) ! chunk batch ! wall 1.750677 comb 1.760000 user 1.740000 sys 0.020000 (best of 6) ! compress ! wall 5.668004 comb 5.670000 user 5.670000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) $ hg perfrevlogchunks -m ! read ! wall 0.365834 comb 0.370000 user 0.350000 sys 0.020000 (best of 26) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.350160 comb 0.350000 user 0.320000 sys 0.030000 (best of 28) ! read batch ! wall 0.024777 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 119) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.024895 comb 0.030000 user 0.000000 sys 0.030000 (best of 118) ! chunk ! wall 2.514061 comb 2.520000 user 2.480000 sys 0.040000 (best of 4) ! chunk batch ! wall 2.380788 comb 2.380000 user 2.360000 sys 0.020000 (best of 5) ! compress ! wall 9.815297 comb 9.820000 user 9.820000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) We already see some interesting data, such as how much slower non-batched chunk reading is and that zlib compression appears to be >2x slower than decompression. I didn't have the data when I wrote this commit message, but I ran this on Mozilla's NFS-based Mercurial server and the time for reading with a reused file descriptor was faster. So I think it is worth testing both with and without file descriptor reuse so we can make informed decisions about recycling file descriptors.

File last commit:

r29954:769aee32 default
r30451:94ca0e13 default
Show More
test-repair-strip.t
139 lines | 3.9 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
#require unix-permissions no-root
$ cat > $TESTTMP/dumpjournal.py <<EOF
> import sys
> for entry in sys.stdin.read().split('\n'):
> if entry:
> print entry.split('\x00')[0]
> EOF
$ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH
$ echo "mq=">> $HGRCPATH
$ teststrip() {
> hg -q up -C $1
> echo % before update $1, strip $2
> hg parents
> chmod -$3 $4
> hg strip $2 2>&1 | sed 's/\(bundle\).*/\1/' | sed 's/Permission denied.*\.hg\/store\/\(.*\)/Permission denied \.hg\/store\/\1/'
> echo % after update $1, strip $2
> chmod +$3 $4
> hg verify
> echo % journal contents
> if [ -f .hg/store/journal ]; then
> cat .hg/store/journal | python $TESTTMP/dumpjournal.py
> else
> echo "(no journal)"
> fi
> ls .hg/store/journal >/dev/null 2>&1 && hg recover
> ls .hg/strip-backup/* >/dev/null 2>&1 && hg unbundle -q .hg/strip-backup/*
> rm -rf .hg/strip-backup
> }
$ hg init test
$ cd test
$ echo a > a
$ hg -q ci -m "a" -A
$ echo b > b
$ hg -q ci -m "b" -A
$ echo b2 >> b
$ hg -q ci -m "b2" -A
$ echo c > c
$ hg -q ci -m "c" -A
$ teststrip 0 2 w .hg/store/data/b.i
% before update 0, strip 2
changeset: 0:cb9a9f314b8b
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: a
saved backup bundle
transaction abort!
failed to truncate data/b.i
rollback failed - please run hg recover
strip failed, backup bundle
abort: Permission denied .hg/store/data/b.i
% after update 0, strip 2
abandoned transaction found - run hg recover
checking changesets
checking manifests
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
checking files
b@?: rev 1 points to nonexistent changeset 2
(expected 1)
b@?: 736c29771fba not in manifests
warning: orphan revlog 'data/c.i'
2 files, 2 changesets, 3 total revisions
2 warnings encountered!
2 integrity errors encountered!
% journal contents
00changelog.i
00manifest.i
data/b.i
data/c.i
rolling back interrupted transaction
checking changesets
checking manifests
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
checking files
2 files, 2 changesets, 2 total revisions
$ teststrip 0 2 r .hg/store/data/b.i
% before update 0, strip 2
changeset: 0:cb9a9f314b8b
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: a
abort: Permission denied .hg/store/data/b.i
% after update 0, strip 2
checking changesets
checking manifests
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
checking files
3 files, 4 changesets, 4 total revisions
% journal contents
(no journal)
$ teststrip 0 2 w .hg/store/00manifest.i
% before update 0, strip 2
changeset: 0:cb9a9f314b8b
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: a
saved backup bundle
transaction abort!
failed to truncate 00manifest.i
rollback failed - please run hg recover
strip failed, backup bundle
abort: Permission denied .hg/store/00manifest.i
% after update 0, strip 2
abandoned transaction found - run hg recover
checking changesets
checking manifests
manifest@?: rev 2 points to nonexistent changeset 2
manifest@?: 3362547cdf64 not in changesets
manifest@?: rev 3 points to nonexistent changeset 3
manifest@?: 265a85892ecb not in changesets
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
c@3: in manifest but not in changeset
checking files
b@?: rev 1 points to nonexistent changeset 2
(expected 1)
c@?: rev 0 points to nonexistent changeset 3
3 files, 2 changesets, 4 total revisions
1 warnings encountered!
7 integrity errors encountered!
(first damaged changeset appears to be 3)
% journal contents
00changelog.i
00manifest.i
data/b.i
data/c.i
rolling back interrupted transaction
checking changesets
checking manifests
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
checking files
2 files, 2 changesets, 2 total revisions
$ cd ..