##// END OF EJS Templates
upstream » mercurial-mirror
RSS

Clone from https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-all

perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations...
perf: add command for measuring revlog chunk operations Upcoming commits will teach revlogs to leverage the new compression engine API so that new compression formats can more easily be leveraged in revlogs. We want to be sure this refactoring doesn't regress performance. So this commit introduces "perfrevchunks" to explicitly test performance of reading, decompressing, and recompressing revlog chunks. Here is output when run on the mozilla-unified repo: $ hg perfrevlogchunks -c ! read ! wall 0.346603 comb 0.350000 user 0.340000 sys 0.010000 (best of 28) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.337707 comb 0.340000 user 0.320000 sys 0.020000 (best of 30) ! read batch ! wall 0.013206 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 221) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.013259 comb 0.030000 user 0.010000 sys 0.020000 (best of 222) ! chunk ! wall 1.909939 comb 1.910000 user 1.900000 sys 0.010000 (best of 6) ! chunk batch ! wall 1.750677 comb 1.760000 user 1.740000 sys 0.020000 (best of 6) ! compress ! wall 5.668004 comb 5.670000 user 5.670000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) $ hg perfrevlogchunks -m ! read ! wall 0.365834 comb 0.370000 user 0.350000 sys 0.020000 (best of 26) ! read w/ reused fd ! wall 0.350160 comb 0.350000 user 0.320000 sys 0.030000 (best of 28) ! read batch ! wall 0.024777 comb 0.020000 user 0.000000 sys 0.020000 (best of 119) ! read batch w/ reused fd ! wall 0.024895 comb 0.030000 user 0.000000 sys 0.030000 (best of 118) ! chunk ! wall 2.514061 comb 2.520000 user 2.480000 sys 0.040000 (best of 4) ! chunk batch ! wall 2.380788 comb 2.380000 user 2.360000 sys 0.020000 (best of 5) ! compress ! wall 9.815297 comb 9.820000 user 9.820000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) We already see some interesting data, such as how much slower non-batched chunk reading is and that zlib compression appears to be >2x slower than decompression. I didn't have the data when I wrote this commit message, but I ran this on Mozilla's NFS-based Mercurial server and the time for reading with a reused file descriptor was faster. So I think it is worth testing both with and without file descriptor reuse so we can make informed decisions about recycling file descriptors.
Sean Farley - - Load All Authors

File last commit:

r27723:bf86e3e8 stable
r30451:94ca0e13 default
Show More
test-unionrepo.t
169 lines | 3.6 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-unionrepo.t
History | Annotation | Raw |Copy content |Copy permalink
Test unionrepo functionality
Create one repository
$ hg init repo1
$ cd repo1
$ touch repo1-0
$ echo repo1-0 > f
$ hg ci -Aqmrepo1-0
$ touch repo1-1
$ echo repo1-1 >> f
$ hg ci -Aqmrepo1-1
$ touch repo1-2
$ echo repo1-2 >> f
$ hg ci -Aqmrepo1-2
$ hg log --template '{rev}:{node|short} {desc|firstline}\n'
2:68c0685446a3 repo1-2
1:8a58db72e69d repo1-1
0:f093fec0529b repo1-0
$ tip1=`hg id -q`
$ cd ..
- and a clone with a not-completely-trivial history
$ hg clone -q repo1 --rev 0 repo2
$ cd repo2
$ touch repo2-1
$ sed '1i\
> repo2-1 at top
> ' f > f.tmp
$ mv f.tmp f
$ hg ci -Aqmrepo2-1
$ touch repo2-2
$ hg pull -q ../repo1 -r 1
$ hg merge -q
$ hg ci -Aqmrepo2-2-merge
$ touch repo2-3
$ echo repo2-3 >> f
$ hg ci -mrepo2-3
$ hg log --template '{rev}:{node|short} {desc|firstline}\n'
4:2f0d178c469c repo2-3
3:9e6fb3e0b9da repo2-2-merge
2:8a58db72e69d repo1-1
1:c337dba826e7 repo2-1
0:f093fec0529b repo1-0
$ cd ..
revisions from repo2 appear as appended / pulled to repo1
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 log --template '{rev}:{node|short} {desc|firstline}\n'
5:2f0d178c469c repo2-3
4:9e6fb3e0b9da repo2-2-merge
3:c337dba826e7 repo2-1
2:68c0685446a3 repo1-2
1:8a58db72e69d repo1-1
0:f093fec0529b repo1-0
manifest can be retrieved for revisions in both repos
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 mani -r $tip1
f
repo1-0
repo1-1
repo1-2
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 mani -r 4
f
repo1-0
repo1-1
repo2-1
repo2-2
files can be retrieved form both repos
$ hg -R repo1 cat repo1/f -r2
repo1-0
repo1-1
repo1-2
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 cat -r$tip1 repo1/f
repo1-0
repo1-1
repo1-2
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 cat -r4 $TESTTMP/repo1/f
repo2-1 at top
repo1-0
repo1-1
files can be compared across repos
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 diff -r$tip1 -rtip
diff -r 68c0685446a3 -r 2f0d178c469c f
--- a/f Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/f Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+repo2-1 at top
repo1-0
repo1-1
-repo1-2
+repo2-3
heads from both repos are found correctly
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 heads --template '{rev}:{node|short} {desc|firstline}\n'
5:2f0d178c469c repo2-3
2:68c0685446a3 repo1-2
revsets works across repos
$ hg -R union:repo1+repo2 id -r "ancestor($tip1, 5)"
8a58db72e69d
annotate works - an indication that linkrevs works
$ hg --cwd repo1 -Runion:../repo2 annotate $TESTTMP/repo1/f -r tip
3: repo2-1 at top
0: repo1-0
1: repo1-1
5: repo2-3
union repos can be cloned ... and clones works correctly
$ hg clone -U union:repo1+repo2 repo3
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 6 changesets with 11 changes to 6 files (+1 heads)
$ hg -R repo3 paths
default = union:repo1+repo2
$ hg -R repo3 verify
checking changesets
checking manifests
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
checking files
6 files, 6 changesets, 11 total revisions
$ hg -R repo3 heads --template '{rev}:{node|short} {desc|firstline}\n'
5:2f0d178c469c repo2-3
2:68c0685446a3 repo1-2
$ hg -R repo3 log --template '{rev}:{node|short} {desc|firstline}\n'
5:2f0d178c469c repo2-3
4:9e6fb3e0b9da repo2-2-merge
3:c337dba826e7 repo2-1
2:68c0685446a3 repo1-2
1:8a58db72e69d repo1-1
0:f093fec0529b repo1-0
union repos should use the correct rev number (issue5024)
$ hg init a
$ cd a
$ echo a0 >> f
$ hg ci -Aqm a0
$ cd ..
$ hg init b
$ cd b
$ echo b0 >> f
$ hg ci -Aqm b0
$ echo b1 >> f
$ hg ci -qm b1
$ cd ..
"hg files -v" to call fctx.size() -> fctx.iscensored()
$ hg files -R union:b+a -r2 -v
3 b/f (glob)