##// END OF EJS Templates
upstream » mercurial-mirror
RSS

Clone from https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-all

httppeer: implement command executor for version 2 peer...
httppeer: implement command executor for version 2 peer Now that we have a new API for issuing commands which is compatible with wire protocol version 2, we can start using it with wire protocol version 2. This commit replaces our hacky implementation of _call() with something a bit more robust based on the new command executor interface. We now have proper support for issuing multiple commands per HTTP request. Each HTTP request maintains its own client reactor. The implementation is similar to the one in the legacy wire protocol. We use a ThreadPoolExecutor for spinning up a thread to read the HTTP response in the background. This allows responses to resolve in any order. While not implemented on the server yet, a client could use concurrent.futures.as_completed() with a collection of futures and handle responses as they arrive from the server. The return value from issued commands is still a simple list of raw or decoded CBOR data. This is still super hacky. We will want a rich data type for representing command responses. But at least this commit gets us one step closer to a proper peer implementation. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3297
Martin von Zweigbergk - - Load All Authors

File last commit:

r35727:1a09dad8 default
r37669:950294e2 default
Show More
test-push-checkheads-superceed-A7.t
103 lines | 2.5 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-push-checkheads-superceed-A7.t
History | Annotation | Raw |Copy content |Copy permalink
====================================
Testing head checking code: Case A-7
====================================
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
This case is part of a series of tests checking this behavior.
Category A: simple case involving a branch being superceeded by another.
TestCase 7: multi-changeset branch, split on multiple other, (head on its own branch), same number of head
.. old-state:
..
.. * 2 branch (1-changeset, and 2-changesets)
..
.. new-state:
..
.. * 1 new branch superceeding the head of the old-2-changesets-branch,
.. * 1 new changesets on the old-1-changeset-branch superceeding the base of the other
..
.. expected-result:
..
.. * push allowed
..
.. graph-summary:
..
.. B ø⇠◔ B'
.. | |
.. A'◔⇢ø |
.. | |/
.. C ● |
.. \|
.. ●
$ . $TESTDIR/testlib/push-checkheads-util.sh
Test setup
----------
$ mkdir A7
$ cd A7
$ setuprepos
creating basic server and client repo
updating to branch default
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd server
$ mkcommit B0
$ hg up 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ mkcommit C0
created new head
$ cd ../client
$ hg pull
pulling from $TESTTMP/A7/server
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+1 heads)
new changesets d73caddc5533:0f88766e02d6
(run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
$ hg up 'desc(C0)'
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ mkcommit A1
$ hg up 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ mkcommit B1
created new head
$ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(A0)" ` `getid "desc(A1)"`
obsoleted 1 changesets
1 new orphan changesets
$ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(B0)" ` `getid "desc(B1)"`
obsoleted 1 changesets
$ hg log -G --hidden
@ 25c56d33e4c4 (draft): B1
|
| o a0802eb7fc1b (draft): A1
| |
| o 0f88766e02d6 (draft): C0
|/
| x d73caddc5533 (draft): B0
| |
| x 8aaa48160adc (draft): A0
|/
o 1e4be0697311 (public): root
Actual testing
--------------
$ hg push
pushing to $TESTTMP/A7/server
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+1 heads)
2 new obsolescence markers
obsoleted 2 changesets
$ cd ../..