##// END OF EJS Templates
wireproto: add streams to frame-based protocol...
wireproto: add streams to frame-based protocol Previously, the frame-based protocol was just a series of frames, with each frame associated with a request ID. In order to scale the protocol, we'll want to enable the use of compression. While it is possible to enable compression at the socket/pipe level, this has its disadvantages. The big one is it undermines the point of frames being standalone, atomic units that can be read and written: if you add compression above the framing protocol, you are back to having a stream-based protocol as opposed to something frame-based. So in order to preserve frames, compression needs to occur at the frame payload level. Compressing each frame's payload individually will limit compression ratios because the window size of the compressor will be limited by the max frame size, which is 32-64kb as currently defined. It will also add CPU overhead, as it is more efficient for compressors to operate on fewer, larger blocks of data than more, smaller blocks. So compressing each frame independently is out. This means we need to compress each frame's payload as if it is part of a larger stream. The simplest approach is to have 1 stream per connection. This could certainly work. However, it has disadvantages (documented below). We could also have 1 stream per RPC/command invocation. (This is the model HTTP/2 goes with.) This also has disadvantages. The main disadvantage to one global stream is that it has the very real potential to create CPU bottlenecks doing compression. Networks are only getting faster and the performance of single CPU cores has been relatively flat. Newer compression formats like zstandard offer better CPU cycle efficiency than predecessors like zlib. But it still all too common to saturate your CPU with compression overhead long before you saturate the network pipe. The main disadvantage with streams per request is that you can't reap the benefits of the compression context for multiple requests. For example, if you send 1000 RPC requests (or HTTP/2 requests for that matter), the response to each would have its own compression context. The overall size of the raw responses would be larger because compression contexts wouldn't be able to reference data from another request or response. The approach for streams as implemented in this commit is to support N streams per connection and for streams to potentially span requests and responses. As explained by the added internals docs, this facilitates servers and clients delegating independent streams and compression to independent threads / CPU cores. This helps alleviate the CPU bottleneck of compression. This design also allows compression contexts to be reused across requests/responses. This can result in improved compression ratios and less overhead for compressors and decompressors having to build new contexts. Another feature that was defined was the ability for individual frames within a stream to declare whether that individual frame's payload uses the content encoding (read: compression) defined by the stream. The idea here is that some servers may serve data from a combination of caches and dynamic resolution. Data coming from caches may be pre-compressed. We want to facilitate servers being able to essentially stream bytes from caches to the wire with minimal overhead. Being able to mix and match with frames are compressed within a stream enables these types of advanced server functionality. This commit defines the new streams mechanism. Basic code for supporting streams in frames has been added. But that code is seriously lacking and doesn't fully conform to the defined protocol. For example, we don't close any streams. And support for content encoding within streams is not yet implemented. The change was rather invasive and I didn't think it would be reasonable to implement the entire feature in a single commit. For the record, I would have loved to reuse an existing multiplexing protocol to build the new wire protocol on top of. However, I couldn't find a protocol that offers the performance and scaling characteristics that I desired. Namely, it should support multiple compression contexts to facilitate scaling out to multiple CPU cores and compression contexts should be able to live longer than single RPC requests. HTTP/2 *almost* fits the bill. But the semantics of HTTP message exchange state that streams can only live for a single request-response. We /could/ tunnel on top of HTTP/2 streams and frames with HEADER and DATA frames. But there's no guarantee that HTTP/2 libraries and proxies would allow us to use HTTP/2 streams and frames without the HTTP message exchange semantics defined in RFC 7540 Section 8. Other RPC protocols like gRPC tunnel are built on top of HTTP/2 and thus preserve its semantics of stream per RPC invocation. Even QUIC does this. We could attempt to invent a higher-level stream that spans HTTP/2 streams. But this would be violating HTTP/2 because there is no guarantee that HTTP/2 streams are routed to the same server. The best we can do - which is what this protocol does - is shoehorn all request and response data into a single HTTP message and create streams within. At that point, we've defined a Content-Type in HTTP parlance. It just so happens our media type can also work as a standalone, stream-based protocol, without leaning on HTTP or similar protocol. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2907

File last commit:

r35180:c9740b69 stable
r37304:9bfcbe4f default
Show More
scripting.txt
200 lines | 7.6 KiB | text/plain | TextLexer
It is common for machines (as opposed to humans) to consume Mercurial.
This help topic describes some of the considerations for interfacing
machines with Mercurial.
Choosing an Interface
=====================
Machines have a choice of several methods to interface with Mercurial.
These include:
- Executing the ``hg`` process
- Querying a HTTP server
- Calling out to a command server
Executing ``hg`` processes is very similar to how humans interact with
Mercurial in the shell. It should already be familiar to you.
:hg:`serve` can be used to start a server. By default, this will start
a "hgweb" HTTP server. This HTTP server has support for machine-readable
output, such as JSON. For more, see :hg:`help hgweb`.
:hg:`serve` can also start a "command server." Clients can connect
to this server and issue Mercurial commands over a special protocol.
For more details on the command server, including links to client
libraries, see https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/CommandServer.
:hg:`serve` based interfaces (the hgweb and command servers) have the
advantage over simple ``hg`` process invocations in that they are
likely more efficient. This is because there is significant overhead
to spawn new Python processes.
.. tip::
If you need to invoke several ``hg`` processes in short order and/or
performance is important to you, use of a server-based interface
is highly recommended.
Environment Variables
=====================
As documented in :hg:`help environment`, various environment variables
influence the operation of Mercurial. The following are particularly
relevant for machines consuming Mercurial:
HGPLAIN
If not set, Mercurial's output could be influenced by configuration
settings that impact its encoding, verbose mode, localization, etc.
It is highly recommended for machines to set this variable when
invoking ``hg`` processes.
HGENCODING
If not set, the locale used by Mercurial will be detected from the
environment. If the determined locale does not support display of
certain characters, Mercurial may render these character sequences
incorrectly (often by using "?" as a placeholder for invalid
characters in the current locale).
Explicitly setting this environment variable is a good practice to
guarantee consistent results. "utf-8" is a good choice on UNIX-like
environments.
HGRCPATH
If not set, Mercurial will inherit config options from config files
using the process described in :hg:`help config`. This includes
inheriting user or system-wide config files.
When utmost control over the Mercurial configuration is desired, the
value of ``HGRCPATH`` can be set to an explicit file with known good
configs. In rare cases, the value can be set to an empty file or the
null device (often ``/dev/null``) to bypass loading of any user or
system config files. Note that these approaches can have unintended
consequences, as the user and system config files often define things
like the username and extensions that may be required to interface
with a repository.
Command-line Flags
==================
Mercurial's default command-line parser is designed for humans, and is not
robust against malicious input. For instance, you can start a debugger by
passing ``--debugger`` as an option value::
$ REV=--debugger sh -c 'hg log -r "$REV"'
This happens because several command-line flags need to be scanned without
using a concrete command table, which may be modified while loading repository
settings and extensions.
Since Mercurial 4.4.2, the parsing of such flags may be restricted by setting
``HGPLAIN=+strictflags``. When this feature is enabled, all early options
(e.g. ``-R/--repository``, ``--cwd``, ``--config``) must be specified first
amongst the other global options, and cannot be injected to an arbitrary
location::
$ HGPLAIN=+strictflags hg -R "$REPO" log -r "$REV"
In earlier Mercurial versions where ``+strictflags`` isn't available, you
can mitigate the issue by concatenating an option value with its flag::
$ hg log -r"$REV" --keyword="$KEYWORD"
Consuming Command Output
========================
It is common for machines to need to parse the output of Mercurial
commands for relevant data. This section describes the various
techniques for doing so.
Parsing Raw Command Output
--------------------------
Likely the simplest and most effective solution for consuming command
output is to simply invoke ``hg`` commands as you would as a user and
parse their output.
The output of many commands can easily be parsed with tools like
``grep``, ``sed``, and ``awk``.
A potential downside with parsing command output is that the output
of commands can change when Mercurial is upgraded. While Mercurial
does generally strive for strong backwards compatibility, command
output does occasionally change. Having tests for your automated
interactions with ``hg`` commands is generally recommended, but is
even more important when raw command output parsing is involved.
Using Templates to Control Output
---------------------------------
Many ``hg`` commands support templatized output via the
``-T/--template`` argument. For more, see :hg:`help templates`.
Templates are useful for explicitly controlling output so that
you get exactly the data you want formatted how you want it. For
example, ``log -T {node}\n`` can be used to print a newline
delimited list of changeset nodes instead of a human-tailored
output containing authors, dates, descriptions, etc.
.. tip::
If parsing raw command output is too complicated, consider
using templates to make your life easier.
The ``-T/--template`` argument allows specifying pre-defined styles.
Mercurial ships with the machine-readable styles ``json`` and ``xml``,
which provide JSON and XML output, respectively. These are useful for
producing output that is machine readable as-is.
.. important::
The ``json`` and ``xml`` styles are considered experimental. While
they may be attractive to use for easily obtaining machine-readable
output, their behavior may change in subsequent versions.
These styles may also exhibit unexpected results when dealing with
certain encodings. Mercurial treats things like filenames as a
series of bytes and normalizing certain byte sequences to JSON
or XML with certain encoding settings can lead to surprises.
Command Server Output
---------------------
If using the command server to interact with Mercurial, you are likely
using an existing library/API that abstracts implementation details of
the command server. If so, this interface layer may perform parsing for
you, saving you the work of implementing it yourself.
Output Verbosity
----------------
Commands often have varying output verbosity, even when machine
readable styles are being used (e.g. ``-T json``). Adding
``-v/--verbose`` and ``--debug`` to the command's arguments can
increase the amount of data exposed by Mercurial.
An alternate way to get the data you need is by explicitly specifying
a template.
Other Topics
============
revsets
Revisions sets is a functional query language for selecting a set
of revisions. Think of it as SQL for Mercurial repositories. Revsets
are useful for querying repositories for specific data.
See :hg:`help revsets` for more.
share extension
The ``share`` extension provides functionality for sharing
repository data across several working copies. It can even
automatically "pool" storage for logically related repositories when
cloning.
Configuring the ``share`` extension can lead to significant resource
utilization reduction, particularly around disk space and the
network. This is especially true for continuous integration (CI)
environments.
See :hg:`help -e share` for more.