##// END OF EJS Templates
largefiles: for update -C, only update largefiles when necessary...
largefiles: for update -C, only update largefiles when necessary Before, a --clean update with largefiles would use the "optimization" that it didn't read hashes from standin files before and after the update. Instead of trusting the content of the standin files, it would rehash all the actual largefiles that lfdirstate reported clean and update the standins that didn't have the expected content. It could thus in some "impossible" situations automatically recover from some "largefile got out sync with its standin" issues (even there apparently still were weird corner cases where it could fail). This extra checking is similar to what core --clean intentionally do not do, and it made update --clean unbearable slow. Usually in core Mercurial, --clean will rely on the dirstate to find the files it should update. (It is thus intentionally possible (when trying to trick the system or if there should be bugs) to end up in situations where --clean not will restore the working directory content correctly.) Checking every file when we "know" it is ok is however not an option - that would be too slow. Instead, trust the content of the standin files. Use the same logic for --clean as for linear updates and trust the dirstate and that our "logic" will keep them in sync. It is much cheaper to just rehash the largefiles reported dirty by a status walk and read all standins than to hash largefiles. Most of the changes are just a change of indentation now when the different kinds of updates no longer are handled that differently. Standins for added files are however only written when doing a normal update, while deleted and removed files only will be updated for --clean updates.

File last commit:

r21391:cb158354 default
r24787:9d5c2789 default
Show More
test-double-merge.t
67 lines | 1.8 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
$ hg init repo
$ cd repo
$ echo line 1 > foo
$ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'
copy foo to bar and change both files
$ hg cp foo bar
$ echo line 2-1 >> foo
$ echo line 2-2 >> bar
$ hg ci -m 'cp foo bar; change both'
in another branch, change foo in a way that doesn't conflict with
the other changes
$ hg up -qC 0
$ echo line 0 > foo
$ hg cat foo >> foo
$ hg ci -m 'change foo'
created new head
we get conflicts that shouldn't be there
$ hg merge -P
changeset: 1:484bf6903104
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: cp foo bar; change both
$ hg merge --debug
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in other:
bar
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: 'foo' -> dst: 'bar' *
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: e6dc8efe11cc, local: 6a0df1dad128+, remote: 484bf6903104
preserving foo for resolve of bar
preserving foo for resolve of foo
bar: remote copied from foo -> m
updating: bar 1/2 files (50.00%)
picked tool 'internal:merge' for bar (binary False symlink False)
merging foo and bar to bar
my bar@6a0df1dad128+ other bar@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
premerge successful
foo: versions differ -> m
updating: foo 2/2 files (100.00%)
picked tool 'internal:merge' for foo (binary False symlink False)
merging foo
my foo@6a0df1dad128+ other foo@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
premerge successful
0 files updated, 2 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
contents of foo
$ cat foo
line 0
line 1
line 2-1
contents of bar
$ cat bar
line 0
line 1
line 2-2
$ cd ..