##// END OF EJS Templates
phabricator: preserve the phase when amending in the Differential fields...
phabricator: preserve the phase when amending in the Differential fields I have no idea if it's better to change scmutil.cleanupnodes() so that it has the option to either apply a specific phase (e.g. for various --secret switches) or carry over the phase of the old node. The benefit would be that the caller doesn't have to remember to do this. The con is maybe inefficiency? I wrote this up as issue5918. I'm leaving that open since Yuya flagged it as an API bug. Since most other callers already do this, it's the simplest fix. (It's not obvious that `split`, `fix` and `rebase` are doing this, but there is test coverage for `fix` and `rebase`, and experimenting with `split` shows it does the right thing.)
Matt Harbison -
r38592:bb7e3c6e @44 default
Show More
Name Size Modified Last Commit Author
/ contrib / fuzz
Makefile Loading ...
README.rst Loading ...
bdiff.cc Loading ...
fuzzutil.cc Loading ...
fuzzutil.h Loading ...
mpatch.cc Loading ...
mpatch_corpus.py Loading ...
xdiff.cc Loading ...

How to add fuzzers (partially cribbed from oss-fuzz[0]):

  1. git clone https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz
  2. cd oss-fuzz
  3. python infra/helper.py build_image mercurial
  4. docker run --cap-add=SYS_PTRACE -it -v $HG_REPO_PATH:/hg-new
    gcr.io/oss-fuzz/mercurial bash
  5. cd /src
  6. rm -r mercurial
  7. ln -s /hg-new mercurial
  8. cd mercurial
  9. compile
  10. ls $OUT

Step 9 is literally running the command "compile", which is part of the docker container. Once you have that working, you can build the fuzzers like this (in the oss-fuzz repo):

python infra/helper.py build_fuzzers --sanitizer address mercurial $HG_REPO_PATH

(you can also say "memory", "undefined" or "coverage" for sanitizer). Then run the built fuzzers like this:

python infra/helper.py run_fuzzer mercurial -- $FUZZER

0: https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/blob/master/docs/new_project_guide.md