##// END OF EJS Templates
verify: update comment to say that lfs doesn't need fulltext to check renames...
verify: update comment to say that lfs doesn't need fulltext to check renames The reason is that `filelog.renamed()` indirectly calls `filelog.revision()`, which is what accesses the full text. However, LFS wraps `filelog.renamed()` and completely handles the case where an LFS blob is in play by using rawdata. I've got a test to demonstrate that this is the case, and prevent regressions. But the `skipread` flag is set on all lfs revisions when using `--no-lfs`, regardless of whether or not the blobs are local. Just above this, that flag is consulted, causing the rename checks to be skipped. That will need to be loosened up first. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7709

File last commit:

r41072:ce0bc295 default
r44408:a447efd9 default
Show More
TODO.rst
21 lines | 782 B | text/x-rst | RstLexer

Address commentary in manifest.excludedmanifestrevlog.add - specifically we should improve the collaboration with core so that add() never gets called on an excluded directory and we can improve the stand-in to raise a ProgrammingError.

Reason more completely about rename-filtering logic in narrowfilelog. There could be some surprises lurking there.

Formally document the narrowspec format. For bonus points, unify with the server-specified narrowspec format.

narrowrepo.setnarrowpats() or narrowspec.save() need to make sure they're holding the wlock.

The follinwg places do an unrestricted dirstate walk (including files outside the narrowspec). Some of them should perhaps not do that.

  • debugfileset
  • perfwalk
  • sparse (but restricted to sparse config)
  • largefiles