##// END OF EJS Templates
share: wrap bmstore._writerepo for transaction sensitivity (issue4940)...
share: wrap bmstore._writerepo for transaction sensitivity (issue4940) 46dec89fe888 made 'bmstore.write()' transaction sensitive, to restore original bookmarks correctly at failure of a transaction. For example, shelve and unshelve imply steps below: before 46dec89fe888: 1. move active bookmark forward at internal rebasing 2. 'bmstore.write()' writes updated ones into .hg/bookmarks 3. rollback transaction to remove internal commits 4. restore updated bookmarks manually after 46dec89fe888: 1. move active bookmark forward at internal rebasing 2. 'bmstore.write()' doesn't write updated ones into .hg/bookmarks (these are written into .hg/bookmarks.pending, if external hook is spawn) 3. rollback transaction to remove internal commits 4. .hg/bookmarks should be clean, because it isn't changed while transaction running: see (2) above But if shelve or unshelve is executed in the repository created with "shared bookmarks" ("hg share -B"), this doesn't work as expected, because: - share extension makes 'bmstore.write()' write updated bookmarks into .hg/bookmarks of shared source repository regardless of transaction activity, and - intentional transaction failure at the end of shelve/unshelve doesn't restore already updated .hg/bookmarks of shared source This patch makes share extension wrap 'bmstore._writerepo()' instead of 'bmstore.write()', because the former is used to actually write bookmark changes out.

File last commit:

r21292:a7a9d84f default
r26933:a7eecd02 stable
Show More
py3kcompat.py
65 lines | 2.1 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
# py3kcompat.py - compatibility definitions for running hg in py3k
#
# Copyright 2010 Renato Cunha <renatoc@gmail.com>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
import builtins
from numbers import Number
def bytesformatter(format, args):
'''Custom implementation of a formatter for bytestrings.
This function currently relies on the string formatter to do the
formatting and always returns bytes objects.
>>> bytesformatter(20, 10)
0
>>> bytesformatter('unicode %s, %s!', ('string', 'foo'))
b'unicode string, foo!'
>>> bytesformatter(b'test %s', 'me')
b'test me'
>>> bytesformatter('test %s', 'me')
b'test me'
>>> bytesformatter(b'test %s', b'me')
b'test me'
>>> bytesformatter('test %s', b'me')
b'test me'
>>> bytesformatter('test %d: %s', (1, b'result'))
b'test 1: result'
'''
# The current implementation just converts from bytes to unicode, do
# what's needed and then convert the results back to bytes.
# Another alternative is to use the Python C API implementation.
if isinstance(format, Number):
# If the fixer erroneously passes a number remainder operation to
# bytesformatter, we just return the correct operation
return format % args
if isinstance(format, bytes):
format = format.decode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
if isinstance(args, bytes):
args = args.decode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
if isinstance(args, tuple):
newargs = []
for arg in args:
if isinstance(arg, bytes):
arg = arg.decode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
newargs.append(arg)
args = tuple(newargs)
ret = format % args
return ret.encode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
builtins.bytesformatter = bytesformatter
origord = builtins.ord
def fakeord(char):
if isinstance(char, int):
return char
return origord(char)
builtins.ord = fakeord
if __name__ == '__main__':
import doctest
doctest.testmod()