##// END OF EJS Templates
share: wrap bmstore._writerepo for transaction sensitivity (issue4940)...
share: wrap bmstore._writerepo for transaction sensitivity (issue4940) 46dec89fe888 made 'bmstore.write()' transaction sensitive, to restore original bookmarks correctly at failure of a transaction. For example, shelve and unshelve imply steps below: before 46dec89fe888: 1. move active bookmark forward at internal rebasing 2. 'bmstore.write()' writes updated ones into .hg/bookmarks 3. rollback transaction to remove internal commits 4. restore updated bookmarks manually after 46dec89fe888: 1. move active bookmark forward at internal rebasing 2. 'bmstore.write()' doesn't write updated ones into .hg/bookmarks (these are written into .hg/bookmarks.pending, if external hook is spawn) 3. rollback transaction to remove internal commits 4. .hg/bookmarks should be clean, because it isn't changed while transaction running: see (2) above But if shelve or unshelve is executed in the repository created with "shared bookmarks" ("hg share -B"), this doesn't work as expected, because: - share extension makes 'bmstore.write()' write updated bookmarks into .hg/bookmarks of shared source repository regardless of transaction activity, and - intentional transaction failure at the end of shelve/unshelve doesn't restore already updated .hg/bookmarks of shared source This patch makes share extension wrap 'bmstore._writerepo()' instead of 'bmstore.write()', because the former is used to actually write bookmark changes out.

File last commit:

r23749:a387b039 default
r26933:a7eecd02 stable
Show More
test-patch-offset.t
82 lines | 1.6 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
$ cat > writepatterns.py <<EOF
> import sys
>
> path = sys.argv[1]
> patterns = sys.argv[2:]
>
> fp = file(path, 'wb')
> for pattern in patterns:
> count = int(pattern[0:-1])
> char = pattern[-1] + '\n'
> fp.write(char*count)
> fp.close()
> EOF
prepare repo
$ hg init a
$ cd a
These initial lines of Xs were not in the original file used to generate
the patch. So all the patch hunks need to be applied to a constant offset
within this file. If the offset isn't tracked then the hunks can be
applied to the wrong lines of this file.
$ python ../writepatterns.py a 34X 10A 1B 10A 1C 10A 1B 10A 1D 10A 1B 10A 1E 10A 1B 10A
$ hg commit -Am adda
adding a
This is a cleaner patch generated via diff
In this case it reproduces the problem when
the output of hg export does not
import patch
$ hg import -v -m 'b' -d '2 0' - <<EOF
> --- a/a 2009-12-08 19:26:17.000000000 -0800
> +++ b/a 2009-12-08 19:26:17.000000000 -0800
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> A
> A
> B
> -A
> +a
> A
> A
> A
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
> A
> A
> B
> -A
> +a
> A
> A
> A
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
> A
> A
> B
> -A
> +a
> A
> A
> A
> EOF
applying patch from stdin
patching file a
Hunk #1 succeeded at 43 (offset 34 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 87 (offset 34 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 109 (offset 34 lines).
committing files:
a
committing manifest
committing changelog
created 189885cecb41
compare imported changes against reference file
$ python ../writepatterns.py aref 34X 10A 1B 1a 9A 1C 10A 1B 10A 1D 10A 1B 1a 9A 1E 10A 1B 1a 9A
$ diff aref a
$ cd ..