##// END OF EJS Templates
bundles: do not overwrite existing backup bundles (BC)...
bundles: do not overwrite existing backup bundles (BC) Previously, a backup bundle could overwrite an existing bundle and cause user data loss. For instance, if you have A<-B<-C and strip B, it produces backup bundle B-backup.hg. If you then hg pull -r B B-backup.hg and strip it again, it overwrites the existing B-backup.hg and C is lost. The fix is to add a hash of all the nodes inside that bundle to the filename. Fixed up existing tests and added a new test in test-strip.t

File last commit:

r17486:73e3e368 default
r23835:aa4a1672 default
Show More
test-diff-issue2761.t
23 lines | 442 B | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-diff-issue2761.t
Test issue2761
$ hg init
$ touch to-be-deleted
$ hg add
adding to-be-deleted
$ hg ci -m first
$ echo a > to-be-deleted
$ hg ci -m second
$ rm to-be-deleted
$ hg diff -r 0
Same issue, different code path
$ hg up -C
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ touch does-not-exist-in-1
$ hg add
adding does-not-exist-in-1
$ hg ci -m third
$ rm does-not-exist-in-1
$ hg diff -r 1