##// END OF EJS Templates
errors: catch urllib errors specifically instead of using safehasattr()...
errors: catch urllib errors specifically instead of using safehasattr() Before this patch, we would catch `IOError` and `OSError` and check if the instance had a `.code` member (indicates `HTTPError`) or a `.reason` member (indicates the more generic `URLError`). It seems to me that can simply catch those exception specifically instead, so that's what this code does. The existing code is from fbe8834923c5 (commands: report http exceptions nicely, 2005-06-17), so I suspect it's just that there was no `urllib2` (where `URLError` lives) back then. The old code mentioned `SSLError` in a comment. The new code does *not* try to catch that. The documentation for `ssl.SSLError` says that it has a `.reason` property, but `python -c 'import ssl; print(dir(ssl.SSLError("foo", Exception("bar"))))` doesn't mention that property on either Python 2 or Python 3 on my system. It also seems that `sslutil` is pretty careful about converting `ssl.SSLError` to `error.Abort`. It also is carefult to not assume that instances of the exception have a `.reason`. So I at least don't want to catch `ssl.SSLError` and handle it the same way as `URLError` because that would likely result in a crash. I also wonder if we don't need to handle it at all (because `sslutil` might handle all the cases). It's now early in the release cycle, so perhaps we can just see how it goes? Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9318
Martin von Zweigbergk -
r46442:ae00e170 default
Show More
Name Size Modified Last Commit Author
/ mercurial / thirdparty / cbor
cbor2
.travis.yml Loading ...
LICENSE.txt Loading ...
README.rst Loading ...
__init__.py Loading ...
Build Status Code Coverage

This library provides encoding and decoding for the Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) (RFC 7049) serialization format.

There exists another Python CBOR implementation (cbor) which is faster on CPython due to its C extensions. On PyPy, cbor2 and cbor are almost identical in performance. The other implementation also lacks documentation and a comprehensive test suite, does not support most standard extension tags and is known to crash (segfault) when passed a cyclic structure (say, a list containing itself).