##// END OF EJS Templates
discovery: be more conservative when adjusting the sample size...
discovery: be more conservative when adjusting the sample size Since 5b34972a0094, the discovery will increase the sample size when it detect a "complex" undecided set. However this detection focussed on the number of roots only, this could regress discovery performance when the undecided set has many roots that eventually get merged into a few heads. To prevent such misbehavior, we adjust the logic to take in account both heads and roots. The sample size will be increased only if both are especially large. Performance testing on the same case as 5b34972a0094, does not show a significant difference.

File last commit:

r38322:1fb2510c @40 default
r42618:b9ff059f default
Show More
bitmanipulation.h
51 lines | 989 B | text/x-c | CLexer
#ifndef _HG_BITMANIPULATION_H_
#define _HG_BITMANIPULATION_H_
#include <string.h>
#include "compat.h"
static inline uint32_t getbe32(const char *c)
{
const unsigned char *d = (const unsigned char *)c;
return ((((uint32_t)d[0]) << 24) | (((uint32_t)d[1]) << 16) |
(((uint32_t)d[2]) << 8) | (d[3]));
}
static inline int16_t getbeint16(const char *c)
{
const unsigned char *d = (const unsigned char *)c;
return ((d[0] << 8) | (d[1]));
}
static inline uint16_t getbeuint16(const char *c)
{
const unsigned char *d = (const unsigned char *)c;
return ((d[0] << 8) | (d[1]));
}
static inline void putbe32(uint32_t x, char *c)
{
c[0] = (x >> 24) & 0xff;
c[1] = (x >> 16) & 0xff;
c[2] = (x >> 8) & 0xff;
c[3] = (x)&0xff;
}
static inline double getbefloat64(const char *c)
{
const unsigned char *d = (const unsigned char *)c;
double ret;
int i;
uint64_t t = 0;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
t = (t << 8) + d[i];
}
memcpy(&ret, &t, sizeof(t));
return ret;
}
#endif