##// END OF EJS Templates
run-tests: mechanism to report exceptions during test execution...
run-tests: mechanism to report exceptions during test execution Sometimes when running tests you introduce a ton of exceptions. The most extreme example of this is running Mercurial with Python 3, which currently spews thousands of exceptions when running the test harness. This commit adds an opt-in feature to run-tests.py to aggregate exceptions encountered by `hg` when running tests. When --exceptions is used, the test harness enables the "logexceptions" extension in the test environment. This extension wraps the Mercurial function to handle exceptions and writes information about the exception to a random filename in a directory defined by the test harness via an environment variable. At the end of the test harness, these files are parsed, aggregated, and a list of all unique Mercurial frames triggering exceptions is printed in order of frequency. This feature is intended to aid Python 3 development. I've only really tested it on Python 3. There is no shortage of improvements that could be made. e.g. we could write a separate file containing the exception report - maybe even an HTML report. We also don't capture which tests demonstrate the exceptions, so there's no turnkey way to test whether a code change made an exception disappear. Perfect is the enemy of good. I think the current patch is useful enough to land. Whoever uses it can send patches to imprve its usefulness. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1477

File last commit:

r33542:b11e8c67 default
r35191:bd8875b6 default
Show More
test-push-checkheads-superceed-A8.t
82 lines | 1.9 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-push-checkheads-superceed-A8.t
====================================
Testing head checking code: Case A-8
====================================
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
This case is part of a series of tests checking this behavior.
Category A: simple case involving a branch being superceeded by another.
TestCase 8: single-changeset branch indirect rewrite
.. old-state:
..
.. * 1-changeset branch
..
.. new-state:
..
.. * 1-changeset branch succeeding to A, through another unpushed changesets
..
.. expected-result:
..
.. * push allowed
..
.. graph-summary:
..
.. A'
.. A ø⇠ø⇠◔ A''
.. |/ /
.. | /
.. |/
.. ●
$ . $TESTDIR/testlib/push-checkheads-util.sh
Test setup
----------
$ mkdir A8
$ cd A8
$ setuprepos
creating basic server and client repo
updating to branch default
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd client
$ hg up 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ mkcommit A1
created new head
$ hg up 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ mkcommit A2
created new head
$ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(A0)" ` `getid "desc(A1)"`
obsoleted 1 changesets
$ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(A1)" ` `getid "desc(A2)"`
obsoleted 1 changesets
$ hg log -G --hidden
@ c1f8d089020f (draft): A2
|
| x f6082bc4ffef (draft): A1
|/
| x 8aaa48160adc (draft): A0
|/
o 1e4be0697311 (public): root
Actual testing
--------------
$ hg push
pushing to $TESTTMP/A8/server (glob)
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
2 new obsolescence markers
obsoleted 1 changesets
$ cd ../..