##// END OF EJS Templates
wireprotov2: add phases to "changesetdata" command...
wireprotov2: add phases to "changesetdata" command This commit teaches the "changesetdata" wire protocol command to emit the phase state for each changeset. This is a different approach from existing phase transfer in a few ways. Previously, if there are no new revisions (or we're not using bundle2), we perform a "listkeys" request to retrieve phase heads. And when revision data is being transferred with bundle2, phases data is encoded in a standalone bundle2 part. In both cases, phases data is logically decoupled from the changeset data and is encountered/applied after changeset revision data is received. The new wire protocol purposefully tries to more tightly associate changeset metadata (phases, bookmarks, obsolescence markers, etc) with the changeset revision and index data itself, rather than have it live as a separate entity that must be fetched and processed separately. I reckon that one reason we didn't do this before was it was difficult to add new data types/fields without breaking existing consumers. By using CBOR maps to transfer changeset data and putting clients in control of what fields are requested / present in those maps, we can easily add additional changeset data while maintaining backwards compatibility. I believe this to be a superior approach to the problem. That being said, for performance reasons, we may need to resort to alternative mechanisms for transferring data like phases. But for now, I think giving the wire protocol the ability to transfer changeset metadata next to the changeset itself is a powerful feature because it is a raw, changeset-centric data API. And if you build simple APIs for accessing the fundamental units of repository data, you enable client-side experimentation (partial clone, etc). If it turns out that we need specialized APIs or mechanisms for transferring data like phases, we can build in those APIs later. For now, I'd like to see how far we can get on simple APIs. It's worth noting that when phase data is being requested, the server will also emit changeset records for nodes in the bases specified by the "noderange" argument. This is to ensure that phase-only updates for nodes the client has are available to the client, even if no new changesets will be transferred. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4483

File last commit:

r35180:c9740b69 stable
r39668:c1aacb0d default
Show More
scripting.txt
200 lines | 7.6 KiB | text/plain | TextLexer
It is common for machines (as opposed to humans) to consume Mercurial.
This help topic describes some of the considerations for interfacing
machines with Mercurial.
Choosing an Interface
=====================
Machines have a choice of several methods to interface with Mercurial.
These include:
- Executing the ``hg`` process
- Querying a HTTP server
- Calling out to a command server
Executing ``hg`` processes is very similar to how humans interact with
Mercurial in the shell. It should already be familiar to you.
:hg:`serve` can be used to start a server. By default, this will start
a "hgweb" HTTP server. This HTTP server has support for machine-readable
output, such as JSON. For more, see :hg:`help hgweb`.
:hg:`serve` can also start a "command server." Clients can connect
to this server and issue Mercurial commands over a special protocol.
For more details on the command server, including links to client
libraries, see https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/CommandServer.
:hg:`serve` based interfaces (the hgweb and command servers) have the
advantage over simple ``hg`` process invocations in that they are
likely more efficient. This is because there is significant overhead
to spawn new Python processes.
.. tip::
If you need to invoke several ``hg`` processes in short order and/or
performance is important to you, use of a server-based interface
is highly recommended.
Environment Variables
=====================
As documented in :hg:`help environment`, various environment variables
influence the operation of Mercurial. The following are particularly
relevant for machines consuming Mercurial:
HGPLAIN
If not set, Mercurial's output could be influenced by configuration
settings that impact its encoding, verbose mode, localization, etc.
It is highly recommended for machines to set this variable when
invoking ``hg`` processes.
HGENCODING
If not set, the locale used by Mercurial will be detected from the
environment. If the determined locale does not support display of
certain characters, Mercurial may render these character sequences
incorrectly (often by using "?" as a placeholder for invalid
characters in the current locale).
Explicitly setting this environment variable is a good practice to
guarantee consistent results. "utf-8" is a good choice on UNIX-like
environments.
HGRCPATH
If not set, Mercurial will inherit config options from config files
using the process described in :hg:`help config`. This includes
inheriting user or system-wide config files.
When utmost control over the Mercurial configuration is desired, the
value of ``HGRCPATH`` can be set to an explicit file with known good
configs. In rare cases, the value can be set to an empty file or the
null device (often ``/dev/null``) to bypass loading of any user or
system config files. Note that these approaches can have unintended
consequences, as the user and system config files often define things
like the username and extensions that may be required to interface
with a repository.
Command-line Flags
==================
Mercurial's default command-line parser is designed for humans, and is not
robust against malicious input. For instance, you can start a debugger by
passing ``--debugger`` as an option value::
$ REV=--debugger sh -c 'hg log -r "$REV"'
This happens because several command-line flags need to be scanned without
using a concrete command table, which may be modified while loading repository
settings and extensions.
Since Mercurial 4.4.2, the parsing of such flags may be restricted by setting
``HGPLAIN=+strictflags``. When this feature is enabled, all early options
(e.g. ``-R/--repository``, ``--cwd``, ``--config``) must be specified first
amongst the other global options, and cannot be injected to an arbitrary
location::
$ HGPLAIN=+strictflags hg -R "$REPO" log -r "$REV"
In earlier Mercurial versions where ``+strictflags`` isn't available, you
can mitigate the issue by concatenating an option value with its flag::
$ hg log -r"$REV" --keyword="$KEYWORD"
Consuming Command Output
========================
It is common for machines to need to parse the output of Mercurial
commands for relevant data. This section describes the various
techniques for doing so.
Parsing Raw Command Output
--------------------------
Likely the simplest and most effective solution for consuming command
output is to simply invoke ``hg`` commands as you would as a user and
parse their output.
The output of many commands can easily be parsed with tools like
``grep``, ``sed``, and ``awk``.
A potential downside with parsing command output is that the output
of commands can change when Mercurial is upgraded. While Mercurial
does generally strive for strong backwards compatibility, command
output does occasionally change. Having tests for your automated
interactions with ``hg`` commands is generally recommended, but is
even more important when raw command output parsing is involved.
Using Templates to Control Output
---------------------------------
Many ``hg`` commands support templatized output via the
``-T/--template`` argument. For more, see :hg:`help templates`.
Templates are useful for explicitly controlling output so that
you get exactly the data you want formatted how you want it. For
example, ``log -T {node}\n`` can be used to print a newline
delimited list of changeset nodes instead of a human-tailored
output containing authors, dates, descriptions, etc.
.. tip::
If parsing raw command output is too complicated, consider
using templates to make your life easier.
The ``-T/--template`` argument allows specifying pre-defined styles.
Mercurial ships with the machine-readable styles ``json`` and ``xml``,
which provide JSON and XML output, respectively. These are useful for
producing output that is machine readable as-is.
.. important::
The ``json`` and ``xml`` styles are considered experimental. While
they may be attractive to use for easily obtaining machine-readable
output, their behavior may change in subsequent versions.
These styles may also exhibit unexpected results when dealing with
certain encodings. Mercurial treats things like filenames as a
series of bytes and normalizing certain byte sequences to JSON
or XML with certain encoding settings can lead to surprises.
Command Server Output
---------------------
If using the command server to interact with Mercurial, you are likely
using an existing library/API that abstracts implementation details of
the command server. If so, this interface layer may perform parsing for
you, saving you the work of implementing it yourself.
Output Verbosity
----------------
Commands often have varying output verbosity, even when machine
readable styles are being used (e.g. ``-T json``). Adding
``-v/--verbose`` and ``--debug`` to the command's arguments can
increase the amount of data exposed by Mercurial.
An alternate way to get the data you need is by explicitly specifying
a template.
Other Topics
============
revsets
Revisions sets is a functional query language for selecting a set
of revisions. Think of it as SQL for Mercurial repositories. Revsets
are useful for querying repositories for specific data.
See :hg:`help revsets` for more.
share extension
The ``share`` extension provides functionality for sharing
repository data across several working copies. It can even
automatically "pool" storage for logically related repositories when
cloning.
Configuring the ``share`` extension can lead to significant resource
utilization reduction, particularly around disk space and the
network. This is especially true for continuous integration (CI)
environments.
See :hg:`help -e share` for more.