##// END OF EJS Templates
wireprotov2: add phases to "changesetdata" command...
wireprotov2: add phases to "changesetdata" command This commit teaches the "changesetdata" wire protocol command to emit the phase state for each changeset. This is a different approach from existing phase transfer in a few ways. Previously, if there are no new revisions (or we're not using bundle2), we perform a "listkeys" request to retrieve phase heads. And when revision data is being transferred with bundle2, phases data is encoded in a standalone bundle2 part. In both cases, phases data is logically decoupled from the changeset data and is encountered/applied after changeset revision data is received. The new wire protocol purposefully tries to more tightly associate changeset metadata (phases, bookmarks, obsolescence markers, etc) with the changeset revision and index data itself, rather than have it live as a separate entity that must be fetched and processed separately. I reckon that one reason we didn't do this before was it was difficult to add new data types/fields without breaking existing consumers. By using CBOR maps to transfer changeset data and putting clients in control of what fields are requested / present in those maps, we can easily add additional changeset data while maintaining backwards compatibility. I believe this to be a superior approach to the problem. That being said, for performance reasons, we may need to resort to alternative mechanisms for transferring data like phases. But for now, I think giving the wire protocol the ability to transfer changeset metadata next to the changeset itself is a powerful feature because it is a raw, changeset-centric data API. And if you build simple APIs for accessing the fundamental units of repository data, you enable client-side experimentation (partial clone, etc). If it turns out that we need specialized APIs or mechanisms for transferring data like phases, we can build in those APIs later. For now, I'd like to see how far we can get on simple APIs. It's worth noting that when phase data is being requested, the server will also emit changeset records for nodes in the bases specified by the "noderange" argument. This is to ensure that phase-only updates for nodes the client has are available to the client, even if no new changesets will be transferred. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4483

File last commit:

r38806:e7aa113b default
r39668:c1aacb0d default
Show More
pvec.py
215 lines | 5.9 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
# pvec.py - probabilistic vector clocks for Mercurial
#
# Copyright 2012 Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
'''
A "pvec" is a changeset property based on the theory of vector clocks
that can be compared to discover relatedness without consulting a
graph. This can be useful for tasks like determining how a
disconnected patch relates to a repository.
Currently a pvec consist of 448 bits, of which 24 are 'depth' and the
remainder are a bit vector. It is represented as a 70-character base85
string.
Construction:
- a root changeset has a depth of 0 and a bit vector based on its hash
- a normal commit has a changeset where depth is increased by one and
one bit vector bit is flipped based on its hash
- a merge changeset pvec is constructed by copying changes from one pvec into
the other to balance its depth
Properties:
- for linear changes, difference in depth is always <= hamming distance
- otherwise, changes are probably divergent
- when hamming distance is < 200, we can reliably detect when pvecs are near
Issues:
- hamming distance ceases to work over distances of ~ 200
- detecting divergence is less accurate when the common ancestor is very close
to either revision or total distance is high
- this could probably be improved by modeling the relation between
delta and hdist
Uses:
- a patch pvec can be used to locate the nearest available common ancestor for
resolving conflicts
- ordering of patches can be established without a DAG
- two head pvecs can be compared to determine whether push/pull/merge is needed
and approximately how many changesets are involved
- can be used to find a heuristic divergence measure between changesets on
different branches
'''
from __future__ import absolute_import
from .node import nullrev
from . import (
pycompat,
util,
)
_size = 448 # 70 chars b85-encoded
_bytes = _size / 8
_depthbits = 24
_depthbytes = _depthbits / 8
_vecbytes = _bytes - _depthbytes
_vecbits = _vecbytes * 8
_radius = (_vecbits - 30) / 2 # high probability vectors are related
def _bin(bs):
'''convert a bytestring to a long'''
v = 0
for b in bs:
v = v * 256 + ord(b)
return v
def _str(v, l):
bs = ""
for p in pycompat.xrange(l):
bs = chr(v & 255) + bs
v >>= 8
return bs
def _split(b):
'''depth and bitvec'''
return _bin(b[:_depthbytes]), _bin(b[_depthbytes:])
def _join(depth, bitvec):
return _str(depth, _depthbytes) + _str(bitvec, _vecbytes)
def _hweight(x):
c = 0
while x:
if x & 1:
c += 1
x >>= 1
return c
_htab = [_hweight(x) for x in pycompat.xrange(256)]
def _hamming(a, b):
'''find the hamming distance between two longs'''
d = a ^ b
c = 0
while d:
c += _htab[d & 0xff]
d >>= 8
return c
def _mergevec(x, y, c):
# Ideally, this function would be x ^ y ^ ancestor, but finding
# ancestors is a nuisance. So instead we find the minimal number
# of changes to balance the depth and hamming distance
d1, v1 = x
d2, v2 = y
if d1 < d2:
d1, d2, v1, v2 = d2, d1, v2, v1
hdist = _hamming(v1, v2)
ddist = d1 - d2
v = v1
m = v1 ^ v2 # mask of different bits
i = 1
if hdist > ddist:
# if delta = 10 and hdist = 100, then we need to go up 55 steps
# to the ancestor and down 45
changes = (hdist - ddist + 1) / 2
else:
# must make at least one change
changes = 1
depth = d1 + changes
# copy changes from v2
if m:
while changes:
if m & i:
v ^= i
changes -= 1
i <<= 1
else:
v = _flipbit(v, c)
return depth, v
def _flipbit(v, node):
# converting bit strings to longs is slow
bit = (hash(node) & 0xffffffff) % _vecbits
return v ^ (1<<bit)
def ctxpvec(ctx):
'''construct a pvec for ctx while filling in the cache'''
r = ctx.repo()
if not util.safehasattr(r, "_pveccache"):
r._pveccache = {}
pvc = r._pveccache
if ctx.rev() not in pvc:
cl = r.changelog
for n in pycompat.xrange(ctx.rev() + 1):
if n not in pvc:
node = cl.node(n)
p1, p2 = cl.parentrevs(n)
if p1 == nullrev:
# start with a 'random' vector at root
pvc[n] = (0, _bin((node * 3)[:_vecbytes]))
elif p2 == nullrev:
d, v = pvc[p1]
pvc[n] = (d + 1, _flipbit(v, node))
else:
pvc[n] = _mergevec(pvc[p1], pvc[p2], node)
bs = _join(*pvc[ctx.rev()])
return pvec(util.b85encode(bs))
class pvec(object):
def __init__(self, hashorctx):
if isinstance(hashorctx, str):
self._bs = hashorctx
self._depth, self._vec = _split(util.b85decode(hashorctx))
else:
self._vec = ctxpvec(hashorctx)
def __str__(self):
return self._bs
def __eq__(self, b):
return self._vec == b._vec and self._depth == b._depth
def __lt__(self, b):
delta = b._depth - self._depth
if delta < 0:
return False # always correct
if _hamming(self._vec, b._vec) > delta:
return False
return True
def __gt__(self, b):
return b < self
def __or__(self, b):
delta = abs(b._depth - self._depth)
if _hamming(self._vec, b._vec) <= delta:
return False
return True
def __sub__(self, b):
if self | b:
raise ValueError("concurrent pvecs")
return self._depth - b._depth
def distance(self, b):
d = abs(b._depth - self._depth)
h = _hamming(self._vec, b._vec)
return max(d, h)
def near(self, b):
dist = abs(b.depth - self._depth)
if dist > _radius or _hamming(self._vec, b._vec) > _radius:
return False