##// END OF EJS Templates
wireprotov2: define and implement "manifestdata" command...
wireprotov2: define and implement "manifestdata" command The added command can be used for obtaining manifest data. Given a manifest path and set of manifest nodes, data about manifests can be retrieved. Unlike changeset data, we wish to emit deltas to describe manifest revisions. So the command uses the relatively new API for building delta requests and emitting them. The code calls into deltaparent(), which I'm not very keen of. There's still work to be done in delta generation land so implementation details of storage (e.g. exactly one delta is stored/available) don't creep into higher levels. But we can worry about this later (there is already a TODO on imanifestorage tracking this). On the subject of parent deltas, the server assumes parent revisions exist on the receiving end. This is obviously wrong for shallow clone. I've added TODOs to add a mechanism to the command to allow clients to specify desired behavior. This shouldn't be too difficult to implement. Another big change is that the client must explicitly request manifest nodes to retrieve. This is a major departure from "getbundle," where the server derives relevant manifests as it iterates changesets and sends them automatically. As implemented, the client must transmit each requested node to the server. At 20 bytes per node, we're looking at 2 MB per 100,000 nodes. Plus wire encoding overhead. This isn't ideal for clients with limited upload bandwidth. I plan to address this in the future by allowing alternate mechanisms for defining the revisions to retrieve. One idea is to define a range of changeset revisions whose manifest revisions to retrieve (similar to how "changesetdata" works). We almost certainly want an API to look up an individual manifest by node. And that's where I've chosen to start with the implementation. Again, a theme of this early exchangev2 work is I want to start by building primitives for accessing raw repository data first and see how far we can get with those before we need more complexity. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4488

File last commit:

r36803:e2c0c088 default
r39673:c7a7c7e8 default
Show More
test-commit-multiple.t
133 lines | 3.7 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-commit-multiple.t
# reproduce issue2264, issue2516
create test repo
$ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH
> [extensions]
> transplant =
> EOF
$ hg init repo
$ cd repo
$ template="{rev} {desc|firstline} [{branch}]\n"
# we need to start out with two changesets on the default branch
# in order to avoid the cute little optimization where transplant
# pulls rather than transplants
add initial changesets
$ echo feature1 > file1
$ hg ci -Am"feature 1"
adding file1
$ echo feature2 >> file2
$ hg ci -Am"feature 2"
adding file2
# The changes to 'bugfix' are enough to show the bug: in fact, with only
# those changes, it's a very noisy crash ("RuntimeError: nothing
# committed after transplant"). But if we modify a second file in the
# transplanted changesets, the bug is much more subtle: transplant
# silently drops the second change to 'bugfix' on the floor, and we only
# see it when we run 'hg status' after transplanting. Subtle data loss
# bugs are worse than crashes, so reproduce the subtle case here.
commit bug fixes on bug fix branch
$ hg branch fixes
marked working directory as branch fixes
(branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
$ echo fix1 > bugfix
$ echo fix1 >> file1
$ hg ci -Am"fix 1"
adding bugfix
$ echo fix2 > bugfix
$ echo fix2 >> file1
$ hg ci -Am"fix 2"
$ hg log -G --template="$template"
@ 3 fix 2 [fixes]
|
o 2 fix 1 [fixes]
|
o 1 feature 2 [default]
|
o 0 feature 1 [default]
transplant bug fixes onto release branch
$ hg update 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg branch release
marked working directory as branch release
$ hg transplant 2 3
applying [0-9a-f]{12} (re)
[0-9a-f]{12} transplanted to [0-9a-f]{12} (re)
applying [0-9a-f]{12} (re)
[0-9a-f]{12} transplanted to [0-9a-f]{12} (re)
$ hg log -G --template="$template"
@ 5 fix 2 [release]
|
o 4 fix 1 [release]
|
| o 3 fix 2 [fixes]
| |
| o 2 fix 1 [fixes]
| |
| o 1 feature 2 [default]
|/
o 0 feature 1 [default]
$ hg status
$ hg status --rev 0:4
M file1
A bugfix
$ hg status --rev 4:5
M bugfix
M file1
now test that we fixed the bug for all scripts/extensions
$ cat > $TESTTMP/committwice.py <<__EOF__
> from mercurial import ui, hg, match, node
> from time import sleep
>
> def replacebyte(fn, b):
> f = open(fn, "rb+")
> f.seek(0, 0)
> f.write(b)
> f.close()
>
> def printfiles(repo, rev):
> repo.ui.status(b"revision %d files: [%s]\n"
> % (rev, b', '.join(b"'%s'" % f
> for f in repo[rev].files())))
>
> repo = hg.repository(ui.ui.load(), b'.')
> assert len(repo) == 6, \
> "initial: len(repo): %d, expected: 6" % len(repo)
>
> replacebyte(b"bugfix", b"u")
> sleep(2)
> try:
> repo.ui.status(b"PRE: len(repo): %d\n" % len(repo))
> wlock = repo.wlock()
> lock = repo.lock()
> replacebyte(b"file1", b"x")
> repo.commit(text=b"x", user=b"test", date=(0, 0))
> replacebyte(b"file1", b"y")
> repo.commit(text=b"y", user=b"test", date=(0, 0))
> repo.ui.status(b"POST: len(repo): %d\n" % len(repo))
> finally:
> lock.release()
> wlock.release()
> printfiles(repo, 6)
> printfiles(repo, 7)
> __EOF__
$ $PYTHON $TESTTMP/committwice.py
PRE: len(repo): 6
POST: len(repo): 8
revision 6 files: ['bugfix', 'file1']
revision 7 files: ['file1']
Do a size-preserving modification outside of that process
$ echo abcd > bugfix
$ hg status
M bugfix
$ hg log --template "{rev} {desc} {files}\n" -r5:
5 fix 2 bugfix file1
6 x bugfix file1
7 y file1
$ cd ..