##// END OF EJS Templates
upstream » mercurial-mirror
RSS

Clone from https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-all

wireprotov2: define and implement "manifestdata" command...
wireprotov2: define and implement "manifestdata" command The added command can be used for obtaining manifest data. Given a manifest path and set of manifest nodes, data about manifests can be retrieved. Unlike changeset data, we wish to emit deltas to describe manifest revisions. So the command uses the relatively new API for building delta requests and emitting them. The code calls into deltaparent(), which I'm not very keen of. There's still work to be done in delta generation land so implementation details of storage (e.g. exactly one delta is stored/available) don't creep into higher levels. But we can worry about this later (there is already a TODO on imanifestorage tracking this). On the subject of parent deltas, the server assumes parent revisions exist on the receiving end. This is obviously wrong for shallow clone. I've added TODOs to add a mechanism to the command to allow clients to specify desired behavior. This shouldn't be too difficult to implement. Another big change is that the client must explicitly request manifest nodes to retrieve. This is a major departure from "getbundle," where the server derives relevant manifests as it iterates changesets and sends them automatically. As implemented, the client must transmit each requested node to the server. At 20 bytes per node, we're looking at 2 MB per 100,000 nodes. Plus wire encoding overhead. This isn't ideal for clients with limited upload bandwidth. I plan to address this in the future by allowing alternate mechanisms for defining the revisions to retrieve. One idea is to define a range of changeset revisions whose manifest revisions to retrieve (similar to how "changesetdata" works). We almost certainly want an API to look up an individual manifest by node. And that's where I've chosen to start with the implementation. Again, a theme of this early exchangev2 work is I want to start by building primitives for accessing raw repository data first and see how far we can get with those before we need more complexity. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4488
Meirambek Omyrzak - - Load All Authors

File last commit:

r39525:f1186c29 default
r39673:c7a7c7e8 default
Show More
test-filebranch.t
146 lines | 3.5 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-filebranch.t
History | Annotation | Raw |Copy content |Copy permalink
This test makes sure that we don't mark a file as merged with its ancestor
when we do a merge.
$ cat <<EOF > merge
> from __future__ import print_function
> import sys, os
> print("merging for", os.path.basename(sys.argv[1]))
> EOF
$ HGMERGE="$PYTHON ../merge"; export HGMERGE
Creating base:
$ hg init a
$ cd a
$ echo 1 > foo
$ echo 1 > bar
$ echo 1 > baz
$ echo 1 > quux
$ hg add foo bar baz quux
$ hg commit -m "base"
$ cd ..
$ hg clone a b
updating to branch default
4 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Creating branch a:
$ cd a
$ echo 2a > foo
$ echo 2a > bar
$ hg commit -m "branch a"
Creating branch b:
$ cd ..
$ cd b
$ echo 2b > foo
$ echo 2b > baz
$ hg commit -m "branch b"
We shouldn't have anything but n state here:
$ hg debugstate --nodates | grep -v "^n"
[1]
Merging:
$ hg pull ../a
pulling from ../a
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+1 heads)
new changesets bdd988058d16
(run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
$ hg merge -v
resolving manifests
getting bar
merging foo
merging for foo
1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ echo 2m > foo
$ echo 2b > baz
$ echo new > quux
$ hg ci -m "merge"
main: we should have a merge here:
$ hg debugindex --changelog
rev linkrev nodeid p1 p2
0 0 cdca01651b96 000000000000 000000000000
1 1 f6718a9cb7f3 cdca01651b96 000000000000
2 2 bdd988058d16 cdca01651b96 000000000000
3 3 d8a521142a3c f6718a9cb7f3 bdd988058d16
log should show foo and quux changed:
$ hg log -v -r tip
changeset: 3:d8a521142a3c
tag: tip
parent: 1:f6718a9cb7f3
parent: 2:bdd988058d16
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
files: foo quux
description:
merge
foo: we should have a merge here:
$ hg debugindex foo
rev linkrev nodeid p1 p2
0 0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000
1 1 2ffeddde1b65 b8e02f643373 000000000000
2 2 33d1fb69067a b8e02f643373 000000000000
3 3 aa27919ee430 2ffeddde1b65 33d1fb69067a
bar: we should not have a merge here:
$ hg debugindex bar
rev linkrev nodeid p1 p2
0 0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000
1 2 33d1fb69067a b8e02f643373 000000000000
baz: we should not have a merge here:
$ hg debugindex baz
rev linkrev nodeid p1 p2
0 0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000
1 1 2ffeddde1b65 b8e02f643373 000000000000
quux: we should not have a merge here:
$ hg debugindex quux
rev linkrev nodeid p1 p2
0 0 b8e02f643373 000000000000 000000000000
1 3 6128c0f33108 b8e02f643373 000000000000
Manifest entries should match tips of all files:
$ hg manifest --debug
33d1fb69067a0139622a3fa3b7ba1cdb1367972e 644 bar
2ffeddde1b65b4827f6746174a145474129fa2ce 644 baz
aa27919ee4303cfd575e1fb932dd64d75aa08be4 644 foo
6128c0f33108e8cfbb4e0824d13ae48b466d7280 644 quux
Everything should be clean now:
$ hg status
$ hg verify
checking changesets
checking manifests
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
checking files
checked 4 changesets with 10 changes to 4 files
$ cd ..