##// END OF EJS Templates
upstream » mercurial-mirror
RSS

Clone from https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-all

wireprotov2: define and implement "manifestdata" command...
wireprotov2: define and implement "manifestdata" command The added command can be used for obtaining manifest data. Given a manifest path and set of manifest nodes, data about manifests can be retrieved. Unlike changeset data, we wish to emit deltas to describe manifest revisions. So the command uses the relatively new API for building delta requests and emitting them. The code calls into deltaparent(), which I'm not very keen of. There's still work to be done in delta generation land so implementation details of storage (e.g. exactly one delta is stored/available) don't creep into higher levels. But we can worry about this later (there is already a TODO on imanifestorage tracking this). On the subject of parent deltas, the server assumes parent revisions exist on the receiving end. This is obviously wrong for shallow clone. I've added TODOs to add a mechanism to the command to allow clients to specify desired behavior. This shouldn't be too difficult to implement. Another big change is that the client must explicitly request manifest nodes to retrieve. This is a major departure from "getbundle," where the server derives relevant manifests as it iterates changesets and sends them automatically. As implemented, the client must transmit each requested node to the server. At 20 bytes per node, we're looking at 2 MB per 100,000 nodes. Plus wire encoding overhead. This isn't ideal for clients with limited upload bandwidth. I plan to address this in the future by allowing alternate mechanisms for defining the revisions to retrieve. One idea is to define a range of changeset revisions whose manifest revisions to retrieve (similar to how "changesetdata" works). We almost certainly want an API to look up an individual manifest by node. And that's where I've chosen to start with the implementation. Again, a theme of this early exchangev2 work is I want to start by building primitives for accessing raw repository data first and see how far we can get with those before we need more complexity. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4488
Yuya Nishihara - - Load All Authors

File last commit:

r37277:8e57c3b0 default
r39673:c7a7c7e8 default
Show More
test-mailmap.t
72 lines | 2.3 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-mailmap.t
History | Annotation | Raw |Copy content |Copy permalink
Create a repo and add some commits
$ hg init mm
$ cd mm
$ echo "Test content" > testfile1
$ hg add testfile1
$ hg commit -m "First commit" -u "Proper <commit@m.c>"
$ echo "Test content 2" > testfile2
$ hg add testfile2
$ hg commit -m "Second commit" -u "Commit Name 2 <commit2@m.c>"
$ echo "Test content 3" > testfile3
$ hg add testfile3
$ hg commit -m "Third commit" -u "Commit Name 3 <commit3@m.c>"
$ echo "Test content 4" > testfile4
$ hg add testfile4
$ hg commit -m "Fourth commit" -u "Commit Name 4 <commit4@m.c>"
Add a .mailmap file with each possible entry type plus comments
$ cat > .mailmap << EOF
> # Comment shouldn't break anything
> <proper@m.c> <commit@m.c> # Should update email only
> Proper Name 2 <commit2@m.c> # Should update name only
> Proper Name 3 <proper@m.c> <commit3@m.c> # Should update name, email due to email
> Proper Name 4 <proper@m.c> Commit Name 4 <commit4@m.c> # Should update name, email due to name, email
> EOF
$ hg add .mailmap
$ hg commit -m "Add mailmap file" -u "Testuser <test123@m.c>"
Output of commits should be normal without filter
$ hg log -T "{author}\n" -r "all()"
Proper <commit@m.c>
Commit Name 2 <commit2@m.c>
Commit Name 3 <commit3@m.c>
Commit Name 4 <commit4@m.c>
Testuser <test123@m.c>
Output of commits with filter shows their mailmap values
$ hg log -T "{mailmap(author)}\n" -r "all()"
Proper <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 2 <commit2@m.c>
Proper Name 3 <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 4 <proper@m.c>
Testuser <test123@m.c>
Add new mailmap entry for testuser
$ cat >> .mailmap << EOF
> <newmmentry@m.c> <test123@m.c>
> EOF
Output of commits with filter shows their updated mailmap values
$ hg log -T "{mailmap(author)}\n" -r "all()"
Proper <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 2 <commit2@m.c>
Proper Name 3 <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 4 <proper@m.c>
Testuser <newmmentry@m.c>
A commit with improperly formatted user field should not break the filter
$ echo "some more test content" > testfile1
$ hg commit -m "Commit with improper user field" -u "Improper user"
$ hg log -T "{mailmap(author)}\n" -r "all()"
Proper <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 2 <commit2@m.c>
Proper Name 3 <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 4 <proper@m.c>
Testuser <newmmentry@m.c>
Improper user
No TypeError beacause of invalid input
$ hg log -T '{mailmap(termwidth)}\n' -r0
80