##// END OF EJS Templates
upstream » mercurial-mirror
RSS

Clone from https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-all

wireprotov2: define and implement "manifestdata" command...
wireprotov2: define and implement "manifestdata" command The added command can be used for obtaining manifest data. Given a manifest path and set of manifest nodes, data about manifests can be retrieved. Unlike changeset data, we wish to emit deltas to describe manifest revisions. So the command uses the relatively new API for building delta requests and emitting them. The code calls into deltaparent(), which I'm not very keen of. There's still work to be done in delta generation land so implementation details of storage (e.g. exactly one delta is stored/available) don't creep into higher levels. But we can worry about this later (there is already a TODO on imanifestorage tracking this). On the subject of parent deltas, the server assumes parent revisions exist on the receiving end. This is obviously wrong for shallow clone. I've added TODOs to add a mechanism to the command to allow clients to specify desired behavior. This shouldn't be too difficult to implement. Another big change is that the client must explicitly request manifest nodes to retrieve. This is a major departure from "getbundle," where the server derives relevant manifests as it iterates changesets and sends them automatically. As implemented, the client must transmit each requested node to the server. At 20 bytes per node, we're looking at 2 MB per 100,000 nodes. Plus wire encoding overhead. This isn't ideal for clients with limited upload bandwidth. I plan to address this in the future by allowing alternate mechanisms for defining the revisions to retrieve. One idea is to define a range of changeset revisions whose manifest revisions to retrieve (similar to how "changesetdata" works). We almost certainly want an API to look up an individual manifest by node. And that's where I've chosen to start with the implementation. Again, a theme of this early exchangev2 work is I want to start by building primitives for accessing raw repository data first and see how far we can get with those before we need more complexity. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4488
Pulkit Goyal - - Load All Authors

File last commit:

r39321:a3fd84f4 default
r39673:c7a7c7e8 default
Show More
test-merge-subrepos.t
140 lines | 3.4 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-merge-subrepos.t
History | Annotation | Raw |Copy content |Copy permalink
$ hg init
$ echo a > a
$ hg ci -qAm 'add a'
$ hg init subrepo
$ echo 'subrepo = http://example.net/libfoo' > .hgsub
$ hg ci -qAm 'added subrepo'
$ hg up -qC 0
$ echo ax > a
$ hg ci -m 'changed a'
created new head
$ hg up -qC 1
$ cd subrepo
$ echo b > b
$ hg add b
$ cd ..
Should fail, since there are added files to subrepo:
$ hg merge
abort: uncommitted changes in subrepository "subrepo"
[255]
Deleted files trigger a '+' marker in top level repos. Deleted files are also
noticed by `update --check` in the top level repo.
$ hg ci -Sqm 'add b'
$ echo change > subrepo/b
$ hg ci -Sm 'change b'
committing subrepository subrepo
$ rm a
$ hg id
9bfe45a197d7+ tip
$ hg sum
parent: 4:9bfe45a197d7 tip
change b
branch: default
commit: 1 deleted (clean)
update: 1 new changesets, 2 branch heads (merge)
phases: 5 draft
$ hg up --check -r '.^'
abort: uncommitted changes
[255]
$ hg st -S
! a
$ hg up -Cq .
Test that dirty is consistent through subrepos
$ rm subrepo/b
A deleted subrepo file is flagged as dirty, like the top level repo
$ hg id --config extensions.blackbox= --config blackbox.dirty=True
9bfe45a197d7+ tip
$ cat .hg/blackbox.log
* @9bfe45a197d7b0ab09bf287729dd57e9619c9da5+ (*)> serve --cmdserver chgunix * (glob) (chg !)
* @9bfe45a197d7b0ab09bf287729dd57e9619c9da5+ (*)> id --config *extensions.blackbox=* --config *blackbox.dirty=True* (glob)
* @9bfe45a197d7b0ab09bf287729dd57e9619c9da5+ (*)> id --config *extensions.blackbox=* --config *blackbox.dirty=True* exited 0 * (glob)
TODO: a deleted file should be listed as such, like the top level repo
$ hg sum
parent: 4:9bfe45a197d7 tip
change b
branch: default
commit: (clean)
update: 1 new changesets, 2 branch heads (merge)
phases: 5 draft
Modified subrepo files are noticed by `update --check` and `summary`
$ echo mod > subrepo/b
$ hg st -S
M subrepo/b
$ hg up -r '.^' --check
abort: uncommitted changes in subrepository "subrepo"
[255]
$ hg sum
parent: 4:9bfe45a197d7 tip
change b
branch: default
commit: 1 subrepos
update: 1 new changesets, 2 branch heads (merge)
phases: 5 draft
TODO: why is -R needed here? If it's because the subrepo is treated as a
discrete unit, then this should probably warn or something.
$ hg revert -R subrepo --no-backup subrepo/b -r .
$ rm subrepo/b
$ hg st -S
! subrepo/b
`hg update --check` notices a subrepo with a missing file, like it notices a
missing file in the top level repo.
$ hg up -r '.^' --check
abort: uncommitted changes in subrepository "subrepo"
[255]
$ hg up -r '.^' --config ui.interactive=True << EOF
> d
> EOF
file 'b' was deleted in local [working copy] but was modified in other [destination].
What do you want to do?
use (c)hanged version, leave (d)eleted, or leave (u)nresolved? d
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
XXX: There's a difference between wdir() and '.', so there should be a status.
`hg files -S` from the top is also missing 'subrepo/b'.
$ hg st -S
$ hg st -R subrepo
$ hg files -R subrepo
[1]
$ hg files -R subrepo -r '.'
subrepo/b
$ hg bookmark -r tip @other
$ echo xyz > subrepo/c
$ hg ci -SAm 'add c'
adding subrepo/c
committing subrepository subrepo
created new head
$ rm subrepo/c
Merge sees deleted subrepo files as an uncommitted change
$ hg merge @other
abort: uncommitted changes in subrepository "subrepo"
[255]