##// END OF EJS Templates
wireprotov2: define and implement "manifestdata" command...
wireprotov2: define and implement "manifestdata" command The added command can be used for obtaining manifest data. Given a manifest path and set of manifest nodes, data about manifests can be retrieved. Unlike changeset data, we wish to emit deltas to describe manifest revisions. So the command uses the relatively new API for building delta requests and emitting them. The code calls into deltaparent(), which I'm not very keen of. There's still work to be done in delta generation land so implementation details of storage (e.g. exactly one delta is stored/available) don't creep into higher levels. But we can worry about this later (there is already a TODO on imanifestorage tracking this). On the subject of parent deltas, the server assumes parent revisions exist on the receiving end. This is obviously wrong for shallow clone. I've added TODOs to add a mechanism to the command to allow clients to specify desired behavior. This shouldn't be too difficult to implement. Another big change is that the client must explicitly request manifest nodes to retrieve. This is a major departure from "getbundle," where the server derives relevant manifests as it iterates changesets and sends them automatically. As implemented, the client must transmit each requested node to the server. At 20 bytes per node, we're looking at 2 MB per 100,000 nodes. Plus wire encoding overhead. This isn't ideal for clients with limited upload bandwidth. I plan to address this in the future by allowing alternate mechanisms for defining the revisions to retrieve. One idea is to define a range of changeset revisions whose manifest revisions to retrieve (similar to how "changesetdata" works). We almost certainly want an API to look up an individual manifest by node. And that's where I've chosen to start with the implementation. Again, a theme of this early exchangev2 work is I want to start by building primitives for accessing raw repository data first and see how far we can get with those before we need more complexity. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4488

File last commit:

r35386:469b06b4 default
r39673:c7a7c7e8 default
Show More
test-rebase-base-flag.t
384 lines | 7.3 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-rebase-base-flag.t
Test the "--base" flag of the rebase command. (Tests unrelated to the "--base"
flag should probably live in somewhere else)
$ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
> [extensions]
> rebase=
> drawdag=$TESTDIR/drawdag.py
>
> [phases]
> publish=False
>
> [alias]
> tglog = log -G --template "{rev}: {node|short} {desc}"
> EOF
$ rebasewithdag() {
> N=`$PYTHON -c "print($N+1)"`
> hg init repo$N && cd repo$N
> hg debugdrawdag
> hg rebase "$@" > _rebasetmp
> r=$?
> grep -v 'saved backup bundle' _rebasetmp
> [ $r -eq 0 ] && hg tglog
> cd ..
> return $r
> }
Single branching point, without merge:
$ rebasewithdag -b D -d Z <<'EOS'
> D E
> |/
> Z B C # C: branching point, E should be picked
> \|/ # B should not be picked
> A
> |
> R
> EOS
rebasing 3:d6003a550c2c "C" (C)
rebasing 5:4526cf523425 "D" (D)
rebasing 6:b296604d9846 "E" (E tip)
o 6: 4870f5e7df37 E
|
| o 5: dc999528138a D
|/
o 4: 6b3e11729672 C
|
o 3: 57e70bad1ea3 Z
|
| o 2: c1e6b162678d B
|/
o 1: 21a6c4502885 A
|
o 0: b41ce7760717 R
Multiple branching points caused by selecting a single merge changeset:
$ rebasewithdag -b E -d Z <<'EOS'
> E
> /|
> B C D # B, C: multiple branching points
> | |/ # D should not be picked
> Z | /
> \|/
> A
> |
> R
> EOS
rebasing 2:c1e6b162678d "B" (B)
rebasing 3:d6003a550c2c "C" (C)
rebasing 6:54c8f00cb91c "E" (E tip)
o 6: 00598421b616 E
|\
| o 5: 6b3e11729672 C
| |
o | 4: 85260910e847 B
|/
o 3: 57e70bad1ea3 Z
|
| o 2: 8924700906fe D
|/
o 1: 21a6c4502885 A
|
o 0: b41ce7760717 R
Rebase should not extend the "--base" revset using "descendants":
$ rebasewithdag -b B -d Z <<'EOS'
> E
> /|
> Z B C # descendants(B) = B+E. With E, C will be included incorrectly
> \|/
> A
> |
> R
> EOS
rebasing 2:c1e6b162678d "B" (B)
rebasing 5:54c8f00cb91c "E" (E tip)
o 5: e583bf3ff54c E
|\
| o 4: 85260910e847 B
| |
| o 3: 57e70bad1ea3 Z
| |
o | 2: d6003a550c2c C
|/
o 1: 21a6c4502885 A
|
o 0: b41ce7760717 R
Rebase should not simplify the "--base" revset using "roots":
$ rebasewithdag -b B+E -d Z <<'EOS'
> E
> /|
> Z B C # roots(B+E) = B. Without E, C will be missed incorrectly
> \|/
> A
> |
> R
> EOS
rebasing 2:c1e6b162678d "B" (B)
rebasing 3:d6003a550c2c "C" (C)
rebasing 5:54c8f00cb91c "E" (E tip)
o 5: 00598421b616 E
|\
| o 4: 6b3e11729672 C
| |
o | 3: 85260910e847 B
|/
o 2: 57e70bad1ea3 Z
|
o 1: 21a6c4502885 A
|
o 0: b41ce7760717 R
The destination is one of the two branching points of a merge:
$ rebasewithdag -b F -d Z <<'EOS'
> F
> / \
> E D
> / /
> Z C
> \ /
> B
> |
> A
> EOS
nothing to rebase
[1]
Multiple branching points caused by multiple bases (issue5420):
$ rebasewithdag -b E1+E2+C2+B1 -d Z <<'EOS'
> Z E2
> | /
> F E1 C2
> |/ /
> E C1 B2
> |/ /
> C B1
> |/
> B
> |
> A
> |
> R
> EOS
rebasing 3:a113dbaa660a "B1" (B1)
rebasing 5:06ce7b1cc8c2 "B2" (B2)
rebasing 6:0ac98cce32d3 "C1" (C1)
rebasing 8:781512f5e33d "C2" (C2)
rebasing 9:428d8c18f641 "E1" (E1)
rebasing 11:e1bf82f6b6df "E2" (E2)
o 12: e4a37b6fdbd2 E2
|
o 11: 9675bea983df E1
|
| o 10: 4faf5d4c80dc C2
| |
| o 9: d4799b1ad57d C1
|/
| o 8: 772732dc64d6 B2
| |
| o 7: ad3ac528a49f B1
|/
o 6: 2cbdfca6b9d5 Z
|
o 5: fcdb3293ec13 F
|
o 4: a4652bb8ac54 E
|
o 3: bd5548558fcf C
|
o 2: c1e6b162678d B
|
o 1: 21a6c4502885 A
|
o 0: b41ce7760717 R
Multiple branching points with multiple merges:
$ rebasewithdag -b G+P -d Z <<'EOS'
> G H P
> |\ /| |\
> F E D M N
> \|/| /| |\
> Z C B I J K L
> \|/ |/ |/
> A A A
> EOS
rebasing 2:dc0947a82db8 "C" (C)
rebasing 8:4e4f9194f9f1 "D" (D)
rebasing 9:03ca77807e91 "E" (E)
rebasing 10:afc707c82df0 "F" (F)
rebasing 13:690dfff91e9e "G" (G)
rebasing 14:2893b886bb10 "H" (H)
rebasing 3:08ebfeb61bac "I" (I)
rebasing 4:a0a5005cec67 "J" (J)
rebasing 5:83780307a7e8 "K" (K)
rebasing 6:e131637a1cb6 "L" (L)
rebasing 11:d1f6d0c3c7e4 "M" (M)
rebasing 12:7aaec6f81888 "N" (N)
rebasing 15:325bc8f1760d "P" (P tip)
o 15: 6ef6a0ea3b18 P
|\
| o 14: 20ba3610a7e5 N
| |\
o \ \ 13: cd4f6c06d2ab M
|\ \ \
| | | o 12: bca872041455 L
| | | |
| | o | 11: 7bbb6c8a6ad7 K
| | |/
| o / 10: de0cbffe893e J
| |/
o / 9: 0e710f176a88 I
|/
| o 8: 52507bab39ca H
| |\
| | | o 7: bb5fe4652f0d G
| | |/|
| | | o 6: f4ad4b31daf4 F
| | | |
| | o | 5: b168f85f2e78 E
| | |/
| o | 4: 8d09fcdb5594 D
| |\|
+---o 3: ab70b4c5a9c9 C
| |
o | 2: 262e37e34f63 Z
| |
| o 1: 112478962961 B
|/
o 0: 426bada5c675 A
Slightly more complex merge case (mentioned in https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2016-November/091074.html):
$ rebasewithdag -b A3+B3 -d Z <<'EOF'
> Z C1 A3 B3
> | / / \ / \
> M3 C0 A1 A2 B1 B2
> | / | | | |
> M2 M1 C1 C1 M3
> |
> M1
> |
> M0
> EOF
rebasing 4:8817fae53c94 "C0" (C0)
rebasing 6:06ca5dfe3b5b "B2" (B2)
rebasing 7:73508237b032 "C1" (C1)
rebasing 9:fdb955e2faed "A2" (A2)
rebasing 11:4e449bd1a643 "A3" (A3)
rebasing 10:0a33b0519128 "B1" (B1)
rebasing 12:209327807c3a "B3" (B3 tip)
o 12: ceb984566332 B3
|\
| o 11: 19d93caac497 B1
| |
| | o 10: 058e73d3916b A3
| | |\
| +---o 9: 0ba13ad72234 A2
| | |
| o | 8: c122c2af10c6 C1
| | |
o | | 7: 74275896650e B2
| | |
| o | 6: 455ba9bd3ea2 C0
|/ /
o | 5: b3d7d2fda53b Z
| |
o | 4: 182ab6383dd7 M3
| |
o | 3: 6c3f73563d5f M2
| |
| o 2: 88c860fffcc2 A1
|/
o 1: bc852baa85dd M1
|
o 0: dbdfc5c9bcd5 M0
Disconnected graph:
$ rebasewithdag -b B -d Z <<'EOS'
> B
> |
> Z A
> EOS
nothing to rebase from 112478962961 to 48b9aae0607f
[1]
Multiple roots. Roots are ancestors of dest:
$ rebasewithdag -b B+D -d Z <<'EOF'
> D Z B
> \|\|
> C A
> EOF
rebasing 2:112478962961 "B" (B)
rebasing 3:b70f76719894 "D" (D)
o 4: 511efad7bf13 D
|
| o 3: 25c4e279af62 B
|/
o 2: 3a49f54d7bb1 Z
|\
| o 1: 96cc3511f894 C
|
o 0: 426bada5c675 A
Multiple roots. One root is not an ancestor of dest:
$ rebasewithdag -b B+D -d Z <<'EOF'
> Z B D
> \|\|
> A C
> EOF
nothing to rebase from f675d5a1c6a4+b70f76719894 to 262e37e34f63
[1]
Multiple roots. One root is not an ancestor of dest. Select using a merge:
$ rebasewithdag -b E -d Z <<'EOF'
> E
> |\
> Z B D
> \|\|
> A C
> EOF
rebasing 2:f675d5a1c6a4 "B" (B)
rebasing 5:f68696fe6af8 "E" (E tip)
o 5: f6e6f5081554 E
|\
| o 4: 30cabcba27be B
| |\
| | o 3: 262e37e34f63 Z
| | |
o | | 2: b70f76719894 D
|/ /
o / 1: 96cc3511f894 C
/
o 0: 426bada5c675 A
Multiple roots. Two children share two parents while dest has only one parent:
$ rebasewithdag -b B+D -d Z <<'EOF'
> Z B D
> \|\|\
> A C A
> EOF
rebasing 2:f675d5a1c6a4 "B" (B)
rebasing 3:c2a779e13b56 "D" (D)
o 4: 5eecd056b5f8 D
|\
+---o 3: 30cabcba27be B
| |/
| o 2: 262e37e34f63 Z
| |
o | 1: 96cc3511f894 C
/
o 0: 426bada5c675 A