##// END OF EJS Templates
wireprotov2: define and implement "manifestdata" command...
wireprotov2: define and implement "manifestdata" command The added command can be used for obtaining manifest data. Given a manifest path and set of manifest nodes, data about manifests can be retrieved. Unlike changeset data, we wish to emit deltas to describe manifest revisions. So the command uses the relatively new API for building delta requests and emitting them. The code calls into deltaparent(), which I'm not very keen of. There's still work to be done in delta generation land so implementation details of storage (e.g. exactly one delta is stored/available) don't creep into higher levels. But we can worry about this later (there is already a TODO on imanifestorage tracking this). On the subject of parent deltas, the server assumes parent revisions exist on the receiving end. This is obviously wrong for shallow clone. I've added TODOs to add a mechanism to the command to allow clients to specify desired behavior. This shouldn't be too difficult to implement. Another big change is that the client must explicitly request manifest nodes to retrieve. This is a major departure from "getbundle," where the server derives relevant manifests as it iterates changesets and sends them automatically. As implemented, the client must transmit each requested node to the server. At 20 bytes per node, we're looking at 2 MB per 100,000 nodes. Plus wire encoding overhead. This isn't ideal for clients with limited upload bandwidth. I plan to address this in the future by allowing alternate mechanisms for defining the revisions to retrieve. One idea is to define a range of changeset revisions whose manifest revisions to retrieve (similar to how "changesetdata" works). We almost certainly want an API to look up an individual manifest by node. And that's where I've chosen to start with the implementation. Again, a theme of this early exchangev2 work is I want to start by building primitives for accessing raw repository data first and see how far we can get with those before we need more complexity. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4488

File last commit:

r37356:cbc4425e default
r39673:c7a7c7e8 default
Show More
test-relink.t
106 lines | 2.6 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
#require hardlink
$ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH
$ echo "relink=" >> $HGRCPATH
$ fix_path() {
> tr '\\' /
> }
$ cat > arelinked.py <<EOF
> from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function
> import os
> import sys
> from mercurial import util
> path1, path2 = sys.argv[1:3]
> if util.samefile(path1, path2):
> print('%s == %s' % (path1, path2))
> else:
> print('%s != %s' % (path1, path2))
> EOF
create source repository
$ hg init repo
$ cd repo
$ echo a > a
$ echo b > b
$ hg ci -Am addfile
adding a
adding b
$ cat "$TESTDIR/binfile.bin" >> a
$ cat "$TESTDIR/binfile.bin" >> b
$ hg ci -Am changefiles
make another commit to create files larger than 1 KB to test
formatting of final byte count
$ cat "$TESTDIR/binfile.bin" >> a
$ cat "$TESTDIR/binfile.bin" >> b
$ hg ci -m anotherchange
don't sit forever trying to double-lock the source repo
$ hg relink .
relinking $TESTTMP/repo/.hg/store to $TESTTMP/repo/.hg/store
there is nothing to relink
Test files are read in binary mode
$ $PYTHON -c "open('.hg/store/data/dummy.i', 'wb').write(b'a\r\nb\n')"
$ cd ..
clone and pull to break links
$ hg clone --pull -r0 repo clone
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files
new changesets 008c0c271c47
updating to branch default
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd clone
$ hg pull -q
$ echo b >> b
$ hg ci -m changeb
created new head
$ $PYTHON -c "open('.hg/store/data/dummy.i', 'wb').write(b'a\nb\r\n')"
relink
#if no-reposimplestore
$ hg relink --debug --config progress.debug=true | fix_path
relinking $TESTTMP/repo/.hg/store to $TESTTMP/clone/.hg/store
tip has 2 files, estimated total number of files: 3
collecting: 00changelog.i 1/3 files (33.33%)
collecting: 00manifest.i 2/3 files (66.67%)
collecting: a.i 3/3 files (100.00%)
collecting: b.i 4/3 files (133.33%)
collecting: dummy.i 5/3 files (166.67%)
collected 5 candidate storage files
not linkable: 00changelog.i
not linkable: 00manifest.i
pruning: data/a.i 3/5 files (60.00%)
not linkable: data/b.i
pruning: data/dummy.i 5/5 files (100.00%)
pruned down to 2 probably relinkable files
relinking: data/a.i 1/2 files (50.00%)
not linkable: data/dummy.i
relinked 1 files (1.36 KB reclaimed)
$ cd ..
check hardlinks
$ $PYTHON arelinked.py repo/.hg/store/data/a.i clone/.hg/store/data/a.i
repo/.hg/store/data/a.i == clone/.hg/store/data/a.i
$ $PYTHON arelinked.py repo/.hg/store/data/b.i clone/.hg/store/data/b.i
repo/.hg/store/data/b.i != clone/.hg/store/data/b.i
#endif