|
|
#testcases filelog compatibility changeset
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ cat >> $HGRCPATH << EOF
|
|
|
> [extensions]
|
|
|
> rebase=
|
|
|
> [alias]
|
|
|
> l = log -G -T '{rev} {desc}\n{files}\n'
|
|
|
> EOF
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if compatibility
|
|
|
$ cat >> $HGRCPATH << EOF
|
|
|
> [experimental]
|
|
|
> copies.read-from = compatibility
|
|
|
> EOF
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
#if changeset
|
|
|
$ cat >> $HGRCPATH << EOF
|
|
|
> [experimental]
|
|
|
> copies.read-from = changeset-only
|
|
|
> copies.write-to = changeset-only
|
|
|
> EOF
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ REPONUM=0
|
|
|
$ newrepo() {
|
|
|
> cd $TESTTMP
|
|
|
> REPONUM=`expr $REPONUM + 1`
|
|
|
> hg init repo-$REPONUM
|
|
|
> cd repo-$REPONUM
|
|
|
> }
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simple rename case
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x'
|
|
|
$ hg mv x y
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies
|
|
|
x -> y
|
|
|
$ hg debugp2copies
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'rename x to y'
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 1 rename x to y
|
|
|
| x y
|
|
|
o 0 add x
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies -r 1
|
|
|
x -> y
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 1
|
|
|
x -> y
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 0
|
|
|
y -> x
|
|
|
Test filtering copies by path. We do filtering by destination.
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 1 x
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 0 x
|
|
|
y -> x
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 1 y
|
|
|
x -> y
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 0 y
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy a file onto another file
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ echo y > y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x and y'
|
|
|
$ hg cp -f x y
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies
|
|
|
x -> y
|
|
|
$ hg debugp2copies
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'copy x onto y'
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 1 copy x onto y
|
|
|
| y
|
|
|
o 0 add x and y
|
|
|
x y
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies -r 1
|
|
|
x -> y
|
|
|
Incorrectly doesn't show the rename
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy a file onto another file with same content. If metadata is stored in changeset, this does not
|
|
|
produce a new filelog entry. The changeset's "files" entry should still list the file.
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ echo x > x2
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x and x2 with same content'
|
|
|
$ hg cp -f x x2
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'copy x onto x2'
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 1 copy x onto x2
|
|
|
| x2
|
|
|
o 0 add x and x2 with same content
|
|
|
x x2
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies -r 1
|
|
|
x -> x2
|
|
|
Incorrectly doesn't show the rename
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy a file, then delete destination, then copy again. This does not create a new filelog entry.
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x'
|
|
|
$ hg cp x y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'copy x to y'
|
|
|
$ hg rm y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'remove y'
|
|
|
$ hg cp -f x y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'copy x onto y (again)'
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 3 copy x onto y (again)
|
|
|
| y
|
|
|
o 2 remove y
|
|
|
| y
|
|
|
o 1 copy x to y
|
|
|
| y
|
|
|
o 0 add x
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies -r 3
|
|
|
x -> y
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 3
|
|
|
x -> y
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rename file in a loop: x->y->z->x
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x'
|
|
|
$ hg mv x y
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies
|
|
|
x -> y
|
|
|
$ hg debugp2copies
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'rename x to y'
|
|
|
$ hg mv y z
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'rename y to z'
|
|
|
$ hg mv z x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'rename z to x'
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 3 rename z to x
|
|
|
| x z
|
|
|
o 2 rename y to z
|
|
|
| y z
|
|
|
o 1 rename x to y
|
|
|
| x y
|
|
|
o 0 add x
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy x to y, then remove y, then add back y. With copy metadata in the changeset, this could easily
|
|
|
end up reporting y as copied from x (if we don't unmark it as a copy when it's removed).
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x'
|
|
|
$ hg mv x y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'rename x to y'
|
|
|
$ hg rm y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -qm 'remove y'
|
|
|
$ echo x > y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add back y'
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 3 add back y
|
|
|
| y
|
|
|
o 2 remove y
|
|
|
| y
|
|
|
o 1 rename x to y
|
|
|
| x y
|
|
|
o 0 add x
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies -r 3
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy x to z, then remove z, then copy x2 (same content as x) to z. With copy metadata in the
|
|
|
changeset, the two copies here will have the same filelog entry, so ctx['z'].introrev() might point
|
|
|
to the first commit that added the file. We should still report the copy as being from x2.
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ echo x > x2
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x and x2 with same content'
|
|
|
$ hg cp x z
|
|
|
$ hg ci -qm 'copy x to z'
|
|
|
$ hg rm z
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'remove z'
|
|
|
$ hg cp x2 z
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'copy x2 to z'
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 3 copy x2 to z
|
|
|
| z
|
|
|
o 2 remove z
|
|
|
| z
|
|
|
o 1 copy x to z
|
|
|
| z
|
|
|
o 0 add x and x2 with same content
|
|
|
x x2
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies -r 3
|
|
|
x2 -> z
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 3
|
|
|
x2 -> z
|
|
|
|
|
|
Create x and y, then rename them both to the same name, but on different sides of a fork
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ echo y > y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x and y'
|
|
|
$ hg mv x z
|
|
|
$ hg ci -qm 'rename x to z'
|
|
|
$ hg co -q 0
|
|
|
$ hg mv y z
|
|
|
$ hg ci -qm 'rename y to z'
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 2 rename y to z
|
|
|
| y z
|
|
|
| o 1 rename x to z
|
|
|
|/ x z
|
|
|
o 0 add x and y
|
|
|
x y
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 2
|
|
|
z -> x
|
|
|
y -> z
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fork renames x to y on one side and removes x on the other
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x'
|
|
|
$ hg mv x y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'rename x to y'
|
|
|
$ hg co -q 0
|
|
|
$ hg rm x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'remove x'
|
|
|
created new head
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 2 remove x
|
|
|
| x
|
|
|
| o 1 rename x to y
|
|
|
|/ x y
|
|
|
o 0 add x
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies via null revision (there shouldn't be any)
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x'
|
|
|
$ hg cp x y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'copy x to y'
|
|
|
$ hg co -q null
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x (again)'
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 2 add x (again)
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
o 1 copy x to y
|
|
|
| y
|
|
|
o 0 add x
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 2
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 2 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge rename from other branch
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x'
|
|
|
$ hg mv x y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'rename x to y'
|
|
|
$ hg co -q 0
|
|
|
$ echo z > z
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add z'
|
|
|
$ hg merge -q 1
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies
|
|
|
$ hg debugp2copies
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'merge rename from p2'
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 3 merge rename from p2
|
|
|
|\ x
|
|
|
| o 2 add z
|
|
|
| | z
|
|
|
o | 1 rename x to y
|
|
|
|/ x y
|
|
|
o 0 add x
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
Perhaps we should indicate the rename here, but `hg status` is documented to be weird during
|
|
|
merges, so...
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies -r 3
|
|
|
$ hg debugp2copies -r 3
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 3
|
|
|
x -> y
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 2
|
|
|
y -> x
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 3
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 2 3
|
|
|
x -> y
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy file from either side in a merge
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x'
|
|
|
$ hg co -q null
|
|
|
$ echo y > y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add y'
|
|
|
$ hg merge -q 0
|
|
|
$ hg cp y z
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies
|
|
|
y -> z
|
|
|
$ hg debugp2copies
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'copy file from p1 in merge'
|
|
|
$ hg co -q 1
|
|
|
$ hg merge -q 0
|
|
|
$ hg cp x z
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies
|
|
|
$ hg debugp2copies
|
|
|
x -> z
|
|
|
$ hg ci -qm 'copy file from p2 in merge'
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 3 copy file from p2 in merge
|
|
|
|\ z
|
|
|
+---o 2 copy file from p1 in merge
|
|
|
| |/ z
|
|
|
| o 1 add y
|
|
|
| y
|
|
|
o 0 add x
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies -r 2
|
|
|
y -> z
|
|
|
$ hg debugp2copies -r 2
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 2
|
|
|
y -> z
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 2
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies -r 3
|
|
|
$ hg debugp2copies -r 3
|
|
|
x -> z
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 3
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 3
|
|
|
x -> z
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy file that exists on both sides of the merge, same content on both sides
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x on branch 1'
|
|
|
$ hg co -q null
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x on branch 2'
|
|
|
$ hg merge -q 0
|
|
|
$ hg cp x z
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies
|
|
|
x -> z
|
|
|
$ hg debugp2copies
|
|
|
$ hg ci -qm 'merge'
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 2 merge
|
|
|
|\ z
|
|
|
| o 1 add x on branch 2
|
|
|
| x
|
|
|
o 0 add x on branch 1
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies -r 2
|
|
|
x -> z
|
|
|
$ hg debugp2copies -r 2
|
|
|
It's a little weird that it shows up on both sides
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 2
|
|
|
x -> z
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 2
|
|
|
x -> z (filelog !)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy file that exists on both sides of the merge, different content
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo branch1 > x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x on branch 1'
|
|
|
$ hg co -q null
|
|
|
$ echo branch2 > x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x on branch 2'
|
|
|
$ hg merge -q 0
|
|
|
warning: conflicts while merging x! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
|
|
|
[1]
|
|
|
$ echo resolved > x
|
|
|
$ hg resolve -m x
|
|
|
(no more unresolved files)
|
|
|
$ hg cp x z
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies
|
|
|
x -> z
|
|
|
$ hg debugp2copies
|
|
|
$ hg ci -qm 'merge'
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 2 merge
|
|
|
|\ x z
|
|
|
| o 1 add x on branch 2
|
|
|
| x
|
|
|
o 0 add x on branch 1
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies -r 2
|
|
|
x -> z (changeset !)
|
|
|
$ hg debugp2copies -r 2
|
|
|
x -> z (no-changeset !)
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 2
|
|
|
x -> z (changeset !)
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 2
|
|
|
x -> z (no-changeset !)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy x->y on one side of merge and copy x->z on the other side. Pathcopies from one parent
|
|
|
of the merge to the merge should include the copy from the other side.
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x'
|
|
|
$ hg cp x y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -qm 'copy x to y'
|
|
|
$ hg co -q 0
|
|
|
$ hg cp x z
|
|
|
$ hg ci -qm 'copy x to z'
|
|
|
$ hg merge -q 1
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'merge copy x->y and copy x->z'
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 3 merge copy x->y and copy x->z
|
|
|
|\
|
|
|
| o 2 copy x to z
|
|
|
| | z
|
|
|
o | 1 copy x to y
|
|
|
|/ y
|
|
|
o 0 add x
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies -r 3
|
|
|
$ hg debugp2copies -r 3
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 2 3
|
|
|
x -> y
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 3
|
|
|
x -> z
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy x to y on one side of merge, create y and rename to z on the other side. Pathcopies from the
|
|
|
first side should not include the y->z rename since y didn't exist in the merge base.
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x'
|
|
|
$ hg cp x y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -qm 'copy x to y'
|
|
|
$ hg co -q 0
|
|
|
$ echo y > y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add y'
|
|
|
$ hg mv y z
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'rename y to z'
|
|
|
$ hg merge -q 1
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'merge'
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 4 merge
|
|
|
|\
|
|
|
| o 3 rename y to z
|
|
|
| | y z
|
|
|
| o 2 add y
|
|
|
| | y
|
|
|
o | 1 copy x to y
|
|
|
|/ y
|
|
|
o 0 add x
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
$ hg debugp1copies -r 3
|
|
|
y -> z
|
|
|
$ hg debugp2copies -r 3
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 2 3
|
|
|
y -> z
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Create x and y, then rename x to z on one side of merge, and rename y to z and modify z on the
|
|
|
other side.
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo x > x
|
|
|
$ echo y > y
|
|
|
$ hg ci -Aqm 'add x and y'
|
|
|
$ hg mv x z
|
|
|
$ hg ci -qm 'rename x to z'
|
|
|
$ hg co -q 0
|
|
|
$ hg mv y z
|
|
|
$ hg ci -qm 'rename y to z'
|
|
|
$ echo z >> z
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'modify z'
|
|
|
$ hg merge -q 1
|
|
|
warning: conflicts while merging z! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
|
|
|
[1]
|
|
|
$ echo z > z
|
|
|
$ hg resolve -qm z
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'merge 1 into 3'
|
|
|
Try merging the other direction too
|
|
|
$ hg co -q 1
|
|
|
$ hg merge -q 3
|
|
|
warning: conflicts while merging z! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
|
|
|
[1]
|
|
|
$ echo z > z
|
|
|
$ hg resolve -qm z
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m 'merge 3 into 1'
|
|
|
created new head
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 5 merge 3 into 1
|
|
|
|\ y z
|
|
|
+---o 4 merge 1 into 3
|
|
|
| |/ x z
|
|
|
| o 3 modify z
|
|
|
| | z
|
|
|
| o 2 rename y to z
|
|
|
| | y z
|
|
|
o | 1 rename x to z
|
|
|
|/ x z
|
|
|
o 0 add x and y
|
|
|
x y
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 4
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 2 4
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 4
|
|
|
x -> z (filelog !)
|
|
|
y -> z (compatibility !)
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 1 5
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 2 5
|
|
|
$ hg debugpathcopies 0 5
|
|
|
x -> z
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test for a case in fullcopytracing algorithm where both the merging csets are
|
|
|
"dirty"; where a dirty cset means that cset is descendant of merge base. This
|
|
|
test reflect that for this particular case this algorithm correctly find the copies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ cat >> $HGRCPATH << EOF
|
|
|
> [experimental]
|
|
|
> evolution.createmarkers=True
|
|
|
> evolution.allowunstable=True
|
|
|
> EOF
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo a > a
|
|
|
$ hg add a
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m "added a"
|
|
|
$ echo b > b
|
|
|
$ hg add b
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m "added b"
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ hg mv b b1
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m "rename b to b1"
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ hg up ".^"
|
|
|
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
|
|
|
$ echo d > d
|
|
|
$ hg add d
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m "added d"
|
|
|
created new head
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ echo baba >> b
|
|
|
$ hg ci --amend -m "added d, modified b"
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ hg l --hidden
|
|
|
@ 4 added d, modified b
|
|
|
| b d
|
|
|
| x 3 added d
|
|
|
|/ d
|
|
|
| o 2 rename b to b1
|
|
|
|/ b b1
|
|
|
o 1 added b
|
|
|
| b
|
|
|
o 0 added a
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grafting revision 4 on top of revision 2, showing that it respect the rename:
|
|
|
|
|
|
TODO: Make this work with copy info in changesets (probably by writing a
|
|
|
changeset-centric version of copies.mergecopies())
|
|
|
#if no-changeset
|
|
|
$ hg up 2 -q
|
|
|
$ hg graft -r 4 --base 3 --hidden
|
|
|
grafting 4:af28412ec03c "added d, modified b" (tip)
|
|
|
merging b1 and b to b1
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ hg l -l1 -p
|
|
|
@ 5 added d, modified b
|
|
|
| b1
|
|
|
~ diff -r 5a4825cc2926 -r 94a2f1a0e8e2 b1
|
|
|
--- a/b1 Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
|
|
|
+++ b/b1 Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
|
|
|
@@ -1,1 +1,2 @@
|
|
|
b
|
|
|
+baba
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test to make sure that fullcopytracing algorithm don't fail when both the merging csets are dirty
|
|
|
(a dirty cset is one who is not the descendant of merge base)
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ newrepo
|
|
|
$ echo a > a
|
|
|
$ hg add a
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m "added a"
|
|
|
$ echo b > b
|
|
|
$ hg add b
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m "added b"
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ echo foobar > willconflict
|
|
|
$ hg add willconflict
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m "added willconflict"
|
|
|
$ echo c > c
|
|
|
$ hg add c
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m "added c"
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 3 added c
|
|
|
| c
|
|
|
o 2 added willconflict
|
|
|
| willconflict
|
|
|
o 1 added b
|
|
|
| b
|
|
|
o 0 added a
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ hg up ".^^"
|
|
|
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
|
|
|
$ echo d > d
|
|
|
$ hg add d
|
|
|
$ hg ci -m "added d"
|
|
|
created new head
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ echo barfoo > willconflict
|
|
|
$ hg add willconflict
|
|
|
$ hg ci --amend -m "added willconflict and d"
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ hg l
|
|
|
@ 5 added willconflict and d
|
|
|
| d willconflict
|
|
|
| o 3 added c
|
|
|
| | c
|
|
|
| o 2 added willconflict
|
|
|
|/ willconflict
|
|
|
o 1 added b
|
|
|
| b
|
|
|
o 0 added a
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ hg rebase -r . -d 2 -t :other
|
|
|
rebasing 5:5018b1509e94 "added willconflict and d" (tip)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ hg up 3 -q
|
|
|
$ hg l --hidden
|
|
|
o 6 added willconflict and d
|
|
|
| d willconflict
|
|
|
| x 5 added willconflict and d
|
|
|
| | d willconflict
|
|
|
| | x 4 added d
|
|
|
| |/ d
|
|
|
+---@ 3 added c
|
|
|
| | c
|
|
|
o | 2 added willconflict
|
|
|
|/ willconflict
|
|
|
o 1 added b
|
|
|
| b
|
|
|
o 0 added a
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now if we trigger a merge between cset revision 3 and 6 using base revision 4, in this case
|
|
|
both the merging csets will be dirty as no one is descendent of base revision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ hg graft -r 6 --base 4 --hidden -t :other
|
|
|
grafting 6:99802e4f1e46 "added willconflict and d" (tip)
|
|
|
|
