##// END OF EJS Templates
narrow: only send the narrowspecs back if ACL in play...
narrow: only send the narrowspecs back if ACL in play I am unable to think why we need to send narrowspecs back from the server. The current state adds a 'narrow:spec' part to each changegroup which is generated when narrow extension is enabled. So we are sending narrowspecs on pull also. There is a problem with sending the narrowspecs the way we are doing it right now. We add include and exclude as parameter of the 'narrow:spec' bundle2 part. The the len of include or exclude string increase 255 which is obvious while working on large repos, bundle2 generation code breaks. For more on that refer issue5952 on bugzilla. I was thinking why we need to send the narrowspecs back, and deleted the 'narrow:spec' bundle2 part generation code and found that only narrow-acl test has some failure. With this patch, we will only send the 'narrow:spec' bundle2 part if ACL is enabled because the original narrowspecs in those cases can be a subset of narrowspecs user requested. There are phase related output change in couple of tests. The output change shows that we are now dealing in public phases completely. So maybe sending the narrow:spec bundle2 part was preventing phases being exchanged or phase bundle2 data being applied. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4931

File last commit:

r38734:70a42898 default
r40373:cb516a85 default
Show More
base-revsets.txt
49 lines | 1.6 KiB | text/plain | TextLexer
# Base Revsets to be used with revsetbenchmarks.py script
#
# The goal of this file is to gather a limited amount of revsets that allow a
# good coverage of the internal revsets mechanisms. Revsets included should not
# be selected for their individual implementation, but for what they reveal of
# the internal implementation of smartsets classes (and their interactions).
#
# Use and update this file when you change internal implementation of these
# smartsets classes. Please include a comment explaining what each of your
# addition is testing. Also check if your changes to the smartset class makes
# some of the tests inadequate and replace them with a new one testing the same
# behavior.
#
# If you want to benchmark revsets predicate itself, check 'all-revsets.txt'.
#
# The current content of this file is currently likely not reaching this goal
# entirely, feel free, to audit its content and comment on each revset to
# highlight what internal mechanisms they test.
all()
draft()
::tip
draft() and ::tip
::tip and draft()
0::tip
roots(0::tip)
author(lmoscovicz)
author(mpm)
author(lmoscovicz) or author(mpm)
author(mpm) or author(lmoscovicz)
tip:0
0::
# those two `roots(...)` inputs are close to what phase movement use.
roots((tip~100::) - (tip~100::tip))
roots((0::) - (0::tip))
42:68 and roots(42:tip)
::p1(p1(tip))::
public()
:10000 and public()
draft()
:10000 and draft()
roots((0:tip)::)
(not public() - obsolete())
(_intlist('20000\x0020001')) and merge()
parents(20000)
(20000::) - (20000)
# The one below is used by rebase
(children(ancestor(tip~5, tip)) and ::(tip~5))::
heads(commonancestors(last(head(), 2)))