##// END OF EJS Templates
subrepo: propagate the --hidden option to hg subrepositories...
subrepo: propagate the --hidden option to hg subrepositories With many commands accepting a '-S' or an explicit path to trigger recursing into subrepos, it seems that --hidden needs to be propagated too. Unfortunately, many of the subrepo layer methods discard the options map, so passing the option along explicitly isn't currently an option. It also isn't clear if other filtered views need to be propagated, so changing all of those commands may be insufficient anyway. The specific jam I got into was amending an ancestor of qbase in a subrepo, and then evolving. The patch ended up being hidden, and outgoing said it would only push one unrelated commit. But push aborted with an 'unknown revision' that I traced back to the patch. (Odd it didn't say 'filtered revision'.) A push with --hidden worked from the subrepo, but that wasn't possible from the parent repo before this. Since the underlying problem doesn't actually require a subrepo, there's probably more to investigate here in the discovery area. Yes, evolve + mq is not exactly sane, but I don't know what is seeing the hidden revision. In lieu of creating a test for the above situation (evolving mq should probably be blocked), the test here is a marginally useful case where --hidden is needed in a subrepo: cat'ing a file in a hidden revision. Without this change, cat aborts with: $ hg --hidden cat subrepo/a skipping missing subrepository: subrepo [1]

File last commit:

r21292:a7a9d84f default
r24877:cc497780 stable
Show More
py3kcompat.py
65 lines | 2.1 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
# py3kcompat.py - compatibility definitions for running hg in py3k
#
# Copyright 2010 Renato Cunha <renatoc@gmail.com>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
import builtins
from numbers import Number
def bytesformatter(format, args):
'''Custom implementation of a formatter for bytestrings.
This function currently relies on the string formatter to do the
formatting and always returns bytes objects.
>>> bytesformatter(20, 10)
0
>>> bytesformatter('unicode %s, %s!', ('string', 'foo'))
b'unicode string, foo!'
>>> bytesformatter(b'test %s', 'me')
b'test me'
>>> bytesformatter('test %s', 'me')
b'test me'
>>> bytesformatter(b'test %s', b'me')
b'test me'
>>> bytesformatter('test %s', b'me')
b'test me'
>>> bytesformatter('test %d: %s', (1, b'result'))
b'test 1: result'
'''
# The current implementation just converts from bytes to unicode, do
# what's needed and then convert the results back to bytes.
# Another alternative is to use the Python C API implementation.
if isinstance(format, Number):
# If the fixer erroneously passes a number remainder operation to
# bytesformatter, we just return the correct operation
return format % args
if isinstance(format, bytes):
format = format.decode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
if isinstance(args, bytes):
args = args.decode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
if isinstance(args, tuple):
newargs = []
for arg in args:
if isinstance(arg, bytes):
arg = arg.decode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
newargs.append(arg)
args = tuple(newargs)
ret = format % args
return ret.encode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
builtins.bytesformatter = bytesformatter
origord = builtins.ord
def fakeord(char):
if isinstance(char, int):
return char
return origord(char)
builtins.ord = fakeord
if __name__ == '__main__':
import doctest
doctest.testmod()