##// END OF EJS Templates
upstream » mercurial-mirror
RSS

Clone from https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-all

largefiles: access to specific fields only if largefiles enabled (issue4547)...
largefiles: access to specific fields only if largefiles enabled (issue4547) Even if largefiles extension is enabled in a repository, "repo" object, which isn't "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed, is passed to overridden functions in the cases below unexpectedly, because extensions are enabled for each repositories strictly. (1) clone without -U: (2) pull with -U: (3) pull with --rebase: combination of "enabled@src", "disabled@dst" and "not-required@src" cause this situation. largefiles requirement @src @dst @src result -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- enabled disabled not-required aborted unexpectedly required requirement error (intentional) -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- enabled enabled * success -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- disabled enabled * success (only for "pull") -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- disabled disabled not-required success required requirement error (intentional) -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- (4) update/revert with a subrepo disabling largefiles In these cases, overridden functions cause accessing to largefiles specific fields of not "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed "repo" object, and execution is aborted. - (1), (2), (4) cause accessing to "_lfstatuswriters" in "getstatuswriter()" invoked via "updatelfiles()" - (3) causes accessing to "_lfcommithooks" in "overriderebase()" For safe accessing to these fields, this patch examines whether passed "repo" object is "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed or not before accessing to them. This patch chooses examining existence of newly introduced "_largefilesenabled" instead of "_lfcommithooks" and "_lfstatuswriters" directly, because the former is better name for the generic "largefiles is enabled in this repo" mark than the latter. In the future, all other overridden functions should avoid largefiles specific processing for efficiency, and "_largefilesenabled" is better also for such purpose. BTW, "lfstatus" can't be used for such purpose, because some code paths set it forcibly regardless of existence of it in specified "repo" object.
Martin Geisler - - Load All Authors

File last commit:

r20117:aa9385f9 default
r24158:d414c28d stable
Show More
test-bundle-vs-outgoing.t
142 lines | 2.3 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-bundle-vs-outgoing.t
History | Annotation | Raw |Copy content |Copy permalink
this structure seems to tickle a bug in bundle's search for
changesets, so first we have to recreate it
o 8
|
| o 7
| |
| o 6
|/|
o | 5
| |
o | 4
| |
| o 3
| |
| o 2
|/
o 1
|
o 0
$ mkrev()
> {
> revno=$1
> echo "rev $revno"
> echo "rev $revno" > foo.txt
> hg -q ci -m"rev $revno"
> }
setup test repo1
$ hg init repo1
$ cd repo1
$ echo "rev 0" > foo.txt
$ hg ci -Am"rev 0"
adding foo.txt
$ mkrev 1
rev 1
first branch
$ mkrev 2
rev 2
$ mkrev 3
rev 3
back to rev 1 to create second branch
$ hg up -r1
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ mkrev 4
rev 4
$ mkrev 5
rev 5
merge first branch to second branch
$ hg up -C -r5
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ HGMERGE=internal:local hg merge
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ echo "merge rev 5, rev 3" > foo.txt
$ hg ci -m"merge first branch to second branch"
one more commit following the merge
$ mkrev 7
rev 7
back to "second branch" to make another head
$ hg up -r5
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ mkrev 8
rev 8
the story so far
$ hg log -G --template "{rev}\n"
@ 8
|
| o 7
| |
| o 6
|/|
o | 5
| |
o | 4
| |
| o 3
| |
| o 2
|/
o 1
|
o 0
check that "hg outgoing" really does the right thing
sanity check of outgoing: expect revs 4 5 6 7 8
$ hg clone -r3 . ../repo2
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 1 files
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
this should (and does) report 5 outgoing revisions: 4 5 6 7 8
$ hg outgoing --template "{rev}\n" ../repo2
comparing with ../repo2
searching for changes
4
5
6
7
8
test bundle (destination repo): expect 5 revisions
this should bundle the same 5 revisions that outgoing reported, but it
actually bundles 7
$ hg bundle foo.bundle ../repo2
searching for changes
5 changesets found
test bundle (base revision): expect 5 revisions
this should (and does) give exactly the same result as bundle
with a destination repo... i.e. it's wrong too
$ hg bundle --base 3 foo.bundle
5 changesets found
$ cd ..