##// END OF EJS Templates
largefiles: access to specific fields only if largefiles enabled (issue4547)...
largefiles: access to specific fields only if largefiles enabled (issue4547) Even if largefiles extension is enabled in a repository, "repo" object, which isn't "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed, is passed to overridden functions in the cases below unexpectedly, because extensions are enabled for each repositories strictly. (1) clone without -U: (2) pull with -U: (3) pull with --rebase: combination of "enabled@src", "disabled@dst" and "not-required@src" cause this situation. largefiles requirement @src @dst @src result -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- enabled disabled not-required aborted unexpectedly required requirement error (intentional) -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- enabled enabled * success -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- disabled enabled * success (only for "pull") -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- disabled disabled not-required success required requirement error (intentional) -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- (4) update/revert with a subrepo disabling largefiles In these cases, overridden functions cause accessing to largefiles specific fields of not "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed "repo" object, and execution is aborted. - (1), (2), (4) cause accessing to "_lfstatuswriters" in "getstatuswriter()" invoked via "updatelfiles()" - (3) causes accessing to "_lfcommithooks" in "overriderebase()" For safe accessing to these fields, this patch examines whether passed "repo" object is "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed or not before accessing to them. This patch chooses examining existence of newly introduced "_largefilesenabled" instead of "_lfcommithooks" and "_lfstatuswriters" directly, because the former is better name for the generic "largefiles is enabled in this repo" mark than the latter. In the future, all other overridden functions should avoid largefiles specific processing for efficiency, and "_largefilesenabled" is better also for such purpose. BTW, "lfstatus" can't be used for such purpose, because some code paths set it forcibly regardless of existence of it in specified "repo" object.

File last commit:

r21391:cb158354 default
r24158:d414c28d stable
Show More
test-copy-move-merge.t
64 lines | 1.4 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
/ tests / test-copy-move-merge.t
$ hg init t
$ cd t
$ echo 1 > a
$ hg ci -qAm "first"
$ hg cp a b
$ hg mv a c
$ echo 2 >> b
$ echo 2 >> c
$ hg ci -qAm "second"
$ hg co -C 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo 0 > a
$ echo 1 >> a
$ hg ci -qAm "other"
$ hg merge --debug
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in other:
b
c
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: 'a' -> dst: 'b' *
src: 'a' -> dst: 'c' *
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: b8bf91eeebbc, local: add3f11052fa+, remote: 17c05bb7fcb6
preserving a for resolve of b
preserving a for resolve of c
removing a
b: remote moved from a -> m
updating: b 1/2 files (50.00%)
picked tool 'internal:merge' for b (binary False symlink False)
merging a and b to b
my b@add3f11052fa+ other b@17c05bb7fcb6 ancestor a@b8bf91eeebbc
premerge successful
c: remote moved from a -> m
updating: c 2/2 files (100.00%)
picked tool 'internal:merge' for c (binary False symlink False)
merging a and c to c
my c@add3f11052fa+ other c@17c05bb7fcb6 ancestor a@b8bf91eeebbc
premerge successful
0 files updated, 2 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
file b
$ cat b
0
1
2
file c
$ cat c
0
1
2
$ cd ..