##// END OF EJS Templates
largefiles: access to specific fields only if largefiles enabled (issue4547)...
largefiles: access to specific fields only if largefiles enabled (issue4547) Even if largefiles extension is enabled in a repository, "repo" object, which isn't "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed, is passed to overridden functions in the cases below unexpectedly, because extensions are enabled for each repositories strictly. (1) clone without -U: (2) pull with -U: (3) pull with --rebase: combination of "enabled@src", "disabled@dst" and "not-required@src" cause this situation. largefiles requirement @src @dst @src result -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- enabled disabled not-required aborted unexpectedly required requirement error (intentional) -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- enabled enabled * success -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- disabled enabled * success (only for "pull") -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- disabled disabled not-required success required requirement error (intentional) -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- (4) update/revert with a subrepo disabling largefiles In these cases, overridden functions cause accessing to largefiles specific fields of not "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed "repo" object, and execution is aborted. - (1), (2), (4) cause accessing to "_lfstatuswriters" in "getstatuswriter()" invoked via "updatelfiles()" - (3) causes accessing to "_lfcommithooks" in "overriderebase()" For safe accessing to these fields, this patch examines whether passed "repo" object is "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed or not before accessing to them. This patch chooses examining existence of newly introduced "_largefilesenabled" instead of "_lfcommithooks" and "_lfstatuswriters" directly, because the former is better name for the generic "largefiles is enabled in this repo" mark than the latter. In the future, all other overridden functions should avoid largefiles specific processing for efficiency, and "_largefilesenabled" is better also for such purpose. BTW, "lfstatus" can't be used for such purpose, because some code paths set it forcibly regardless of existence of it in specified "repo" object.

File last commit:

r23482:208ec8ca default
r24158:d414c28d stable
Show More
test-issue672.t
102 lines | 2.9 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue672
# 0-2-4
# \ \ \
# 1-3-5
#
# rename in #1, content change in #4.
$ hg init
$ touch 1
$ touch 2
$ hg commit -Am init # 0
adding 1
adding 2
$ hg rename 1 1a
$ hg commit -m rename # 1
$ hg co -C 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo unrelated >> 2
$ hg ci -m unrelated1 # 2
created new head
$ hg merge --debug 1
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in other:
1a
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: '1' -> dst: '1a'
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: 81f4b099af3d, local: c64f439569a9+, remote: c12dcd37c90a
1: other deleted -> r
removing 1
updating: 1 1/2 files (50.00%)
1a: remote created -> g
getting 1a
updating: 1a 2/2 files (100.00%)
2: remote unchanged -> k
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg ci -m merge1 # 3
$ hg co -C 2
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo hello >> 1
$ hg ci -m unrelated2 # 4
created new head
$ hg co -C 3
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg merge -y --debug 4
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in local:
1a
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: '1' -> dst: '1a' *
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: c64f439569a9, local: e327dca35ac8+, remote: 746e9549ea96
preserving 1a for resolve of 1a
1a: local copied/moved from 1 -> m
updating: 1a 1/1 files (100.00%)
picked tool 'internal:merge' for 1a (binary False symlink False)
merging 1a and 1 to 1a
my 1a@e327dca35ac8+ other 1@746e9549ea96 ancestor 1@81f4b099af3d
premerge successful
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg co -C 4
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg merge -y --debug 3
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in other:
1a
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
src: '1' -> dst: '1a' *
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
ancestor: c64f439569a9, local: 746e9549ea96+, remote: e327dca35ac8
preserving 1 for resolve of 1a
removing 1
1a: remote moved from 1 -> m
updating: 1a 1/1 files (100.00%)
picked tool 'internal:merge' for 1a (binary False symlink False)
merging 1 and 1a to 1a
my 1a@746e9549ea96+ other 1a@e327dca35ac8 ancestor 1@81f4b099af3d
premerge successful
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)