##// END OF EJS Templates
largefiles: access to specific fields only if largefiles enabled (issue4547)...
largefiles: access to specific fields only if largefiles enabled (issue4547) Even if largefiles extension is enabled in a repository, "repo" object, which isn't "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed, is passed to overridden functions in the cases below unexpectedly, because extensions are enabled for each repositories strictly. (1) clone without -U: (2) pull with -U: (3) pull with --rebase: combination of "enabled@src", "disabled@dst" and "not-required@src" cause this situation. largefiles requirement @src @dst @src result -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- enabled disabled not-required aborted unexpectedly required requirement error (intentional) -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- enabled enabled * success -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- disabled enabled * success (only for "pull") -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- disabled disabled not-required success required requirement error (intentional) -------- -------- --------------- -------------------- (4) update/revert with a subrepo disabling largefiles In these cases, overridden functions cause accessing to largefiles specific fields of not "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed "repo" object, and execution is aborted. - (1), (2), (4) cause accessing to "_lfstatuswriters" in "getstatuswriter()" invoked via "updatelfiles()" - (3) causes accessing to "_lfcommithooks" in "overriderebase()" For safe accessing to these fields, this patch examines whether passed "repo" object is "largefiles.reposetup()"-ed or not before accessing to them. This patch chooses examining existence of newly introduced "_largefilesenabled" instead of "_lfcommithooks" and "_lfstatuswriters" directly, because the former is better name for the generic "largefiles is enabled in this repo" mark than the latter. In the future, all other overridden functions should avoid largefiles specific processing for efficiency, and "_largefilesenabled" is better also for such purpose. BTW, "lfstatus" can't be used for such purpose, because some code paths set it forcibly regardless of existence of it in specified "repo" object.

File last commit:

r21940:9209c02f stable
r24158:d414c28d stable
Show More
test-merge9.t
95 lines | 1.7 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
test that we don't interrupt the merge session if
a file-level merge failed
$ hg init repo
$ cd repo
$ echo foo > foo
$ echo a > bar
$ hg ci -Am 'add foo'
adding bar
adding foo
$ hg mv foo baz
$ echo b >> bar
$ echo quux > quux1
$ hg ci -Am 'mv foo baz'
adding quux1
$ hg up -qC 0
$ echo >> foo
$ echo c >> bar
$ echo quux > quux2
$ hg ci -Am 'change foo'
adding quux2
created new head
test with the rename on the remote side
$ HGMERGE=false hg merge
merging bar
merging bar failed!
merging foo and baz to baz
1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg update -C .' to abandon
[1]
$ hg resolve -l
U bar
R baz
test with the rename on the local side
$ hg up -C 1
3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ HGMERGE=false hg merge
merging bar
merging bar failed!
merging baz and foo to baz
1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg update -C .' to abandon
[1]
show unresolved
$ hg resolve -l
U bar
R baz
unmark baz
$ hg resolve -u baz
show
$ hg resolve -l
U bar
U baz
$ hg st
M bar
M baz
M quux2
? bar.orig
re-resolve baz
$ hg resolve baz
merging baz and foo to baz
after resolve
$ hg resolve -l
U bar
R baz
resolve all warning
$ hg resolve
abort: no files or directories specified
(use --all to remerge all files)
[255]
resolve all
$ hg resolve -a
merging bar
warning: conflicts during merge.
merging bar incomplete! (edit conflicts, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
[1]
after
$ hg resolve -l
U bar
R baz
$ cd ..