##// END OF EJS Templates
inno: script to automate building Inno installer...
inno: script to automate building Inno installer The official Inno installer build process is poorly documented. And attempting to reproduce behavior of the installer uploaded to www.mercurial-scm.org has revealed a number of unexpected behaviors. This commit attempts to improve the state of reproducibility of the Inno installer by introducing a Python script to largely automate the building of the installer. The new script (which must be run from an environment with the Visual C++ environment configured) takes care of producing an Inno installer. When run from a fresh Mercurial source checkout with all the proper system dependencies (the VC++ toolchain, Windows 10 SDK, and Inno tools) installed, it "just works." The script takes care of downloading all the Python dependencies in a secure manner and manages the build environment for you. You don't need any additional config files: just launch the script, pointing it at an existing Python and ISCC binary and it takes care of the rest. The produced installer creates a Mercurial installation with a handful of differences from the existing 4.9 installers (produced by someone else): * add_path.exe is missing (this was removed a few changesets ago) * The set of api-ms-win-core-* DLLs is different (I suspect this is due to me using a different UCRT / Windows version). * kernelbase.dll and msasn1.dll are missing. * There are a different set of .pyc files for dulwich, keyring, and pygments due to us using the latest versions of each. * We include Tcl/Tk DLLs and .pyc files (I'm not sure why these are missing from the existing installers). * We include the urllib3 and win32ctypes packages (which are dependencies of dulwich and pywin32, respectively). I'm not sure why these aren't present in the existing installers. * We include a different set of files for the distutils package. I'm not sure why. But it should be harmless. * We include the docutils package (it is getting picked up as a dependency somehow). I think this is fine. * We include a copy of argparse.pyc. I'm not sure why this was missing from existing installers. * We don't have a copy of sqlite3/dump.pyc. I'm not sure why. The SQLite C extension code only imports this module when conn.iterdump() is called. It should be safe to omit. * We include files in the email.test and test packages. The set of files is small and their presence should be harmless. The new script and support code is written in Python 3 because it is brand new and independent code and I don't believe new Python projects should be using Python 2 in 2019 if they have a choice about it. The readme.txt file has been renamed to readme.rst and overhauled to reflect the existence of build.py. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6066

File last commit:

r39983:a063b84c default
r42019:d7dc4ac1 default
Show More
undumprevlog
50 lines | 1.2 KiB | text/plain | TextLexer
#!/usr/bin/env python
# Undump a dump from dumprevlog
# $ hg init
# $ undumprevlog < repo.dump
from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function
import sys
from mercurial import (
encoding,
node,
pycompat,
revlog,
transaction,
vfs as vfsmod,
)
from mercurial.utils import (
procutil,
)
for fp in (sys.stdin, sys.stdout, sys.stderr):
procutil.setbinary(fp)
opener = vfsmod.vfs(b'.', False)
tr = transaction.transaction(sys.stderr.write, opener, {b'store': opener},
b"undump.journal")
while True:
l = sys.stdin.readline()
if not l:
break
if l.startswith("file:"):
f = encoding.strtolocal(l[6:-1])
r = revlog.revlog(opener, f)
pycompat.stdout.write(b'%s\n' % f)
elif l.startswith("node:"):
n = node.bin(l[6:-1])
elif l.startswith("linkrev:"):
lr = int(l[9:-1])
elif l.startswith("parents:"):
p = l[9:-1].split()
p1 = node.bin(p[0])
p2 = node.bin(p[1])
elif l.startswith("length:"):
length = int(l[8:-1])
sys.stdin.readline() # start marker
d = encoding.strtolocal(sys.stdin.read(length))
sys.stdin.readline() # end marker
r.addrevision(d, tr, lr, p1, p2)
tr.close()