##// END OF EJS Templates
wireprotov2: update stream encoding specification...
wireprotov2: update stream encoding specification The encoding of data within streams in the frame-based protocol is not yet defined or implemented. This means that all data in wire protocol version 2 is currently being sent out raw, without compression. That's obviously not ideal. This commit formalizes the beginnings of stream encoding support in the protocol. I suspect we'll change behavior substantially in the future. My goal is to get something landed so we can use compression. We can build out more robust support later. Because the frame type ID changed, this is strictly BC. But existing code wasn't using the frame. I'll bump the framing protocol version later once code is introduced to use the new frame. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4915

File last commit:

r37195:68ee6182 default
r40161:e2fe1074 default
Show More
ro.py
67 lines | 2.0 KiB | text/x-python | PythonLexer
##############################################################################
#
# Copyright (c) 2003 Zope Foundation and Contributors.
# All Rights Reserved.
#
# This software is subject to the provisions of the Zope Public License,
# Version 2.1 (ZPL). A copy of the ZPL should accompany this distribution.
# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
# WARRANTIES ARE DISCLAIMED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED
# WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, AGAINST INFRINGEMENT, AND FITNESS
# FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
#
##############################################################################
"""Compute a resolution order for an object and its bases
"""
from __future__ import absolute_import
__docformat__ = 'restructuredtext'
def _mergeOrderings(orderings):
"""Merge multiple orderings so that within-ordering order is preserved
Orderings are constrained in such a way that if an object appears
in two or more orderings, then the suffix that begins with the
object must be in both orderings.
For example:
>>> _mergeOrderings([
... ['x', 'y', 'z'],
... ['q', 'z'],
... [1, 3, 5],
... ['z']
... ])
['x', 'y', 'q', 1, 3, 5, 'z']
"""
seen = {}
result = []
for ordering in reversed(orderings):
for o in reversed(ordering):
if o not in seen:
seen[o] = 1
result.insert(0, o)
return result
def _flatten(ob):
result = [ob]
i = 0
for ob in iter(result):
i += 1
# The recursive calls can be avoided by inserting the base classes
# into the dynamically growing list directly after the currently
# considered object; the iterator makes sure this will keep working
# in the future, since it cannot rely on the length of the list
# by definition.
result[i:i] = ob.__bases__
return result
def ro(object):
"""Compute a "resolution order" for an object
"""
return _mergeOrderings([_flatten(object)])