##// END OF EJS Templates
upstream » mercurial-mirror
RSS

Clone from https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-all

perf: add command to benchmark bundle reading...
perf: add command to benchmark bundle reading Upcoming commits will be refactoring bundle2 I/O code. This commit establishes a `hg perfbundleread` command that measures how long it takes to read a bundle using various mechanisms. As a baseline, here's output from an uncompressed bundle1 bundle of my Firefox repo (7,098,622,890 bytes): ! read(8k) ! wall 0.763481 comb 0.760000 user 0.160000 sys 0.600000 (best of 6) ! read(16k) ! wall 0.644512 comb 0.640000 user 0.110000 sys 0.530000 (best of 16) ! read(32k) ! wall 0.581172 comb 0.590000 user 0.060000 sys 0.530000 (best of 18) ! read(128k) ! wall 0.535183 comb 0.530000 user 0.010000 sys 0.520000 (best of 19) ! cg1 deltaiter() ! wall 0.873500 comb 0.880000 user 0.840000 sys 0.040000 (best of 12) ! cg1 getchunks() ! wall 6.283797 comb 6.270000 user 5.570000 sys 0.700000 (best of 3) ! cg1 read(8k) ! wall 1.097173 comb 1.100000 user 0.400000 sys 0.700000 (best of 10) ! cg1 read(16k) ! wall 0.810750 comb 0.800000 user 0.200000 sys 0.600000 (best of 13) ! cg1 read(32k) ! wall 0.671215 comb 0.670000 user 0.110000 sys 0.560000 (best of 15) ! cg1 read(128k) ! wall 0.597857 comb 0.600000 user 0.020000 sys 0.580000 (best of 15) And from an uncompressed bundle2 bundle (6,070,036,163 bytes): ! read(8k) ! wall 0.676997 comb 0.680000 user 0.160000 sys 0.520000 (best of 15) ! read(16k) ! wall 0.592706 comb 0.590000 user 0.080000 sys 0.510000 (best of 17) ! read(32k) ! wall 0.529395 comb 0.530000 user 0.050000 sys 0.480000 (best of 16) ! read(128k) ! wall 0.491270 comb 0.490000 user 0.010000 sys 0.480000 (best of 19) ! bundle2 forwardchunks() ! wall 2.997131 comb 2.990000 user 2.270000 sys 0.720000 (best of 4) ! bundle2 iterparts() ! wall 12.247197 comb 10.670000 user 8.170000 sys 2.500000 (best of 3) ! bundle2 part seek() ! wall 11.761675 comb 10.500000 user 8.240000 sys 2.260000 (best of 3) ! bundle2 part read(8k) ! wall 9.116163 comb 9.110000 user 8.240000 sys 0.870000 (best of 3) ! bundle2 part read(16k) ! wall 8.984362 comb 8.970000 user 8.110000 sys 0.860000 (best of 3) ! bundle2 part read(32k) ! wall 8.758364 comb 8.740000 user 7.860000 sys 0.880000 (best of 3) ! bundle2 part read(128k) ! wall 8.749040 comb 8.730000 user 7.830000 sys 0.900000 (best of 3) We already see some interesting data. Notably that bundle2 has significant overhead compared to bundle1. This matters for e.g. stream clone bundles, which can be applied at >1Gbps. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1385
Pierre-Yves David - - Load All Authors

File last commit:

r25609:67a2192d default
r35108:e9661304 default
Show More
base-revsets.txt
48 lines | 1.6 KiB | text/plain | TextLexer
/ contrib / base-revsets.txt
History | Annotation | Raw |Copy content |Copy permalink
# Base Revsets to be used with revsetbenchmarks.py script
#
# The goal of this file is to gather a limited amount of revsets that allow a
# good coverage of the internal revsets mechanisms. Revsets included should not
# be selected for their individual implementation, but for what they reveal of
# the internal implementation of smartsets classes (and their interactions).
#
# Use and update this file when you change internal implementation of these
# smartsets classes. Please include a comment explaining what each of your
# addition is testing. Also check if your changes to the smartset class makes
# some of the tests inadequate and replace them with a new one testing the same
# behavior.
#
# If you want to benchmark revsets predicate itself, check 'all-revsets.txt'.
#
# The current content of this file is currently likely not reaching this goal
# entirely, feel free, to audit its content and comment on each revset to
# highlight what internal mechanisms they test.
all()
draft()
::tip
draft() and ::tip
::tip and draft()
0::tip
roots(0::tip)
author(lmoscovicz)
author(mpm)
author(lmoscovicz) or author(mpm)
author(mpm) or author(lmoscovicz)
tip:0
0::
# those two `roots(...)` inputs are close to what phase movement use.
roots((tip~100::) - (tip~100::tip))
roots((0::) - (0::tip))
42:68 and roots(42:tip)
::p1(p1(tip))::
public()
:10000 and public()
draft()
:10000 and draft()
roots((0:tip)::)
(not public() - obsolete())
(_intlist('20000\x0020001')) and merge()
parents(20000)
(20000::) - (20000)
# The one below is used by rebase
(children(ancestor(tip~5, tip)) and ::(tip~5))::