##// END OF EJS Templates
largefiles: check file in the repo store before checking remotely (issue5257)...
largefiles: check file in the repo store before checking remotely (issue5257) Problem was files to check were gathered in the repository where the verify was launched but verification was done on the remote store. It was observed when user committed in cloned repository and ran verify before pushing - committed files were marked as non existing. This commit fixes this by checking in the remote store only files that are not existing in the repository store where verify was launched. Solution is similiar to fd288d118074

File last commit:

r15194:0705f2ac default
r29421:ecbbf4d5 default
Show More
test-patch.t
89 lines | 2.3 KiB | text/troff | Tads3Lexer
$ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF
> import sys
> print 'Using custom patch'
> if '--binary' in sys.argv:
> print '--binary found !'
> EOF
$ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH
$ echo "patch=python ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH
$ hg init a
$ cd a
$ echo a > a
$ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0'
adding a
$ echo b >> a
$ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0'
$ cd ..
This test checks that:
- custom patch commands with arguments actually work
- patch code does not try to add weird arguments like
--binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance
--binary is added by default under win32.
check custom patch options are honored
$ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip
$ hg clone -r 0 a b
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff
applying ../a.diff
Using custom patch
applied to working directory
Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description
Prepare source repo and patch:
$ rm $HGRCPATH
$ hg init c
$ cd c
$ printf "a\rc" > a
$ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0'
$ printf "a\rb\rc" > a
$ cat << eof > log
> first line which can't start with '# '
> # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
> A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
> eof
$ hg ci -l log -d '0 0'
$ hg export -o p 1
$ cd ..
Clone and apply patch:
$ hg clone -r 0 c d
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd d
$ hg import ../c/p
applying ../c/p
$ hg log -v -r 1
changeset: 1:cd0bde79c428
tag: tip
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
files: a
description:
first line which can't start with '# '
# second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
# HG changeset patch
# User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
$ cd ..