##// END OF EJS Templates
Fixed two typos...
Raphael Kruse -
Show More
@@ -346,7 +346,7 b' SPEC 0 and SPEC 4'
346 346 You've heard about the NEPs, (NumPy enhancement Proposal), having a NEP for something non-numpy specific was sometime confusing.
347 347 Long live the `SPECs <https://scientific-python.org/specs/>`_.
348 348
349 We are now trying to follow SPEC 0 (aka old NEP 29) for of support of upstream libraries.
349 We are now trying to follow SPEC 0 (aka old NEP 29) for support of upstream libraries.
350 350
351 351 We also now try to follow SPEC 4 (test and publish nightly on a centralized nightly repository).
352 352 We encourage you to do so as well in order to report breakage, and contribute to the SPEC process !
@@ -356,7 +356,7 b' Python 3.12 compatibility ?'
356 356 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
357 357
358 358 Python 3.12 changed its tokenizer to have better support for f-strings and allow arbitrary expression.
359 This is a great new feature and performance improvement in python 3.12.
359 This is a great new feature and performance improvement in Python 3.12.
360 360
361 361 Unfortunately this means the new tokenizer does not support incomplete or invalid Python which will
362 362 break many features of IPython. Thus compatibility of IPython with Python 3.12 is not guarantied.
General Comments 0
You need to be logged in to leave comments. Login now