##// END OF EJS Templates
copies-rust: leverage the immutability for efficient update...
marmoute -
r46585:cc759d3d default
parent child Browse files
Show More
@@ -1,6 +1,7 b''
1 1 use crate::utils::hg_path::HgPathBuf;
2 2 use crate::Revision;
3 3
4 use im_rc::ordmap::DiffItem;
4 5 use im_rc::ordmap::OrdMap;
5 6
6 7 use std::collections::HashMap;
@@ -8,7 +9,7 b' use std::collections::HashSet;'
8 9
9 10 pub type PathCopies = HashMap<HgPathBuf, HgPathBuf>;
10 11
11 #[derive(Clone, Debug)]
12 #[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq)]
12 13 struct TimeStampedPathCopy {
13 14 /// revision at which the copy information was added
14 15 rev: Revision,
@@ -199,70 +200,116 b' fn merge_copies_dict('
199 200 changes: &ChangedFiles,
200 201 is_ancestor: &impl Fn(Revision, Revision) -> bool,
201 202 ) -> TimeStampedPathCopies {
202 let mut result = minor.clone();
203 for (dest, src_major) in major {
204 let overwrite;
205 if let Some(src_minor) = minor.get(&dest) {
206 {
203 if minor.is_empty() {
204 return major;
205 } else if major.is_empty() {
206 return minor;
207 }
208 let mut override_minor = Vec::new();
209 let mut override_major = Vec::new();
210
211 let mut to_major = |k: &HgPathBuf, v: &TimeStampedPathCopy| {
212 override_major.push((k.clone(), v.clone()))
213 };
214 let mut to_minor = |k: &HgPathBuf, v: &TimeStampedPathCopy| {
215 override_minor.push((k.clone(), v.clone()))
216 };
217
218 // The diff function leverage detection of the identical subpart if minor
219 // and major has some common ancestors. This make it very fast is most
220 // case.
221 //
222 // In case where the two map are vastly different in size, the current
223 // approach is still slowish because the iteration will iterate over
224 // all the "exclusive" content of the larger on. This situation can be
225 // frequent when the subgraph of revision we are processing has a lot
226 // of roots. Each roots adding they own fully new map to the mix (and
227 // likely a small map, if the path from the root to the "main path" is
228 // small.
229 //
230 // We could do better by detecting such situation and processing them
231 // differently.
232 for d in minor.diff(&major) {
233 match d {
234 DiffItem::Add(k, v) => to_minor(k, v),
235 DiffItem::Remove(k, v) => to_major(k, v),
236 DiffItem::Update { old, new } => {
237 let (dest, src_major) = new;
238 let (_, src_minor) = old;
239 let mut pick_minor = || (to_major(dest, src_minor));
240 let mut pick_major = || (to_minor(dest, src_major));
207 241 if src_major.path == src_minor.path {
208 // we have the same value, no need to battle;
242 // we have the same value, but from other source;
209 243 if src_major.rev == src_minor.rev {
210 244 // If the two entry are identical, no need to do
211 // anything
212 overwrite = false;
245 // anything (but diff should not have yield them)
246 unreachable!();
213 247 } else if is_ancestor(src_major.rev, src_minor.rev) {
214 overwrite = false;
248 pick_minor();
215 249 } else {
216 overwrite = true;
250 pick_major();
217 251 }
218 252 } else if src_major.rev == src_minor.rev {
219 253 // We cannot get copy information for both p1 and p2 in the
220 254 // same rev. So this is the same value.
221 overwrite = false;
255 unreachable!();
222 256 } else if src_major.path.is_none()
223 && changes.salvaged.contains(&dest)
257 && changes.salvaged.contains(dest)
224 258 {
225 259 // If the file is "deleted" in the major side but was
226 260 // salvaged by the merge, we keep the minor side alive
227 overwrite = false;
261 pick_minor();
228 262 } else if src_minor.path.is_none()
229 && changes.salvaged.contains(&dest)
263 && changes.salvaged.contains(dest)
230 264 {
231 265 // If the file is "deleted" in the minor side but was
232 266 // salvaged by the merge, unconditionnaly preserve the
233 267 // major side.
234 overwrite = true;
235 } else if changes.merged.contains(&dest) {
268 pick_major();
269 } else if changes.merged.contains(dest) {
236 270 // If the file was actively merged, copy information from
237 271 // each side might conflict. The major side will win such
238 272 // conflict.
239 overwrite = true;
273 pick_major();
240 274 } else if is_ancestor(src_major.rev, src_minor.rev) {
241 275 // If the minor side is strictly newer than the major side,
242 276 // it should be kept.
243 overwrite = false;
277 pick_minor();
244 278 } else if src_major.path.is_some() {
245 279 // without any special case, the "major" value win other
246 280 // the "minor" one.
247 overwrite = true;
281 pick_major();
248 282 } else if is_ancestor(src_minor.rev, src_major.rev) {
249 283 // the "major" rev is a direct ancestors of "minor", any
250 284 // different value should overwrite
251 overwrite = true;
285 pick_major();
252 286 } else {
253 287 // major version is None (so the file was deleted on that
254 288 // branch) and that branch is independant (neither minor
255 289 // nor major is an ancestors of the other one.) We preserve
256 290 // the new information about the new file.
257 overwrite = false;
291 pick_minor();
258 292 }
259 293 }
294 };
295 }
296
297 let updates;
298 let mut result;
299 if override_major.is_empty() {
300 result = major
301 } else if override_minor.is_empty() {
302 result = minor
303 } else {
304 if override_minor.len() < override_major.len() {
305 updates = override_minor;
306 result = minor;
260 307 } else {
261 // minor had no value
262 overwrite = true;
308 updates = override_major;
309 result = major;
263 310 }
264 if overwrite {
265 result.insert(dest, src_major);
311 for (k, v) in updates {
312 result.insert(k, v);
266 313 }
267 314 }
268 315 result
General Comments 0
You need to be logged in to leave comments. Login now