bundle2: inline changegroup.readexactly() Profiling reveals this loop is pretty tight. Literally any function call elimination can make a big difference. This commit inlines the relatively trivial changegroup.readexactly() method inside the loop. The results with `hg perfbundleread` on a bundle of the Firefox repo speak for themselves: ! read(8k) ! wall 0.679730 comb 0.680000 user 0.140000 sys 0.540000 (best of 15) ! read(16k) ! wall 0.577228 comb 0.570000 user 0.080000 sys 0.490000 (best of 17) ! read(32k) ! wall 0.516060 comb 0.520000 user 0.040000 sys 0.480000 (best of 20) ! read(128k) ! wall 0.496378 comb 0.490000 user 0.010000 sys 0.480000 (best of 20) ! bundle2 iterparts() ! wall 3.460903 comb 3.460000 user 2.760000 sys 0.700000 (best of 3) ! wall 3.056811 comb 3.050000 user 2.340000 sys 0.710000 (best of 4) ! bundle2 iterparts() seekable ! wall 4.312722 comb 4.310000 user 3.480000 sys 0.830000 (best of 3) ! wall 4.007676 comb 4.000000 user 3.170000 sys 0.830000 (best of 3) ! bundle2 part seek() ! wall 6.754764 comb 6.740000 user 3.970000 sys 2.770000 (best of 3) ! wall 6.267110 comb 6.250000 user 3.480000 sys 2.770000 (best of 3) ! bundle2 part read(8k) ! wall 3.668004 comb 3.660000 user 2.960000 sys 0.700000 (best of 3) ! wall 3.404164 comb 3.400000 user 2.650000 sys 0.750000 (best of 3) ! bundle2 part read(16k) ! wall 3.489196 comb 3.480000 user 2.750000 sys 0.730000 (best of 3) ! wall 3.197972 comb 3.200000 user 2.490000 sys 0.710000 (best of 4) ! bundle2 part read(32k) ! wall 3.388569 comb 3.380000 user 2.640000 sys 0.740000 (best of 3) ! wall 3.060557 comb 3.060000 user 2.340000 sys 0.720000 (best of 4) ! bundle2 part read(128k) ! wall 3.276415 comb 3.270000 user 2.560000 sys 0.710000 (best of 4) ! wall 2.952209 comb 2.950000 user 2.230000 sys 0.720000 (best of 4) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1392