##// END OF EJS Templates
rebase: allow for rebasing descendants onto ancestors on different named branches...
rebase: allow for rebasing descendants onto ancestors on different named branches So far we've been denying rebasing descendants onto ancestors, but there are situations in which this kind of operation makes perfect sense to me. Let's say we have made a commit (or more), that belongs to branch 'dev', on top of the named branch 'stable': ... a (stable) - b (dev) but then we realize that b should belong to branch 'stable'. In these cases a rebase means: "move these csets from named branch A to named branch B" and there isn't a valid reason to deny it. This patch basically doesn't block it, if source and destination are on different named branches. The old behaviour still applies for rebases across the same named branch. Can you think of any tricky corner cases in which this new behaviour could lead to problems? (I bet there are tons of them...) By the way, I created a brand new .t because I feel there should be more tests I can't think of at the moment.
Stefano Tortarolo -
r13733:4e2690a7 default
Show More
Name Size Modified Last Commit Author
contrib
doc
hgext
i18n
mercurial
tests
.hgignore Loading ...
.hgsigs Loading ...
.hgtags Loading ...
CONTRIBUTORS Loading ...
COPYING Loading ...
Makefile Loading ...
README Loading ...
hg Loading ...
hgeditor Loading ...
hgweb.cgi Loading ...
setup.py Loading ...

Mercurial
=========

Mercurial is a fast, easy to use, distributed revision control tool
for software developers.

Basic install:

$ make # see install targets
$ make install # do a system-wide install
$ hg debuginstall # sanity-check setup
$ hg # see help

See http://mercurial.selenic.com/ for detailed installation
instructions, platform-specific notes, and Mercurial user information.